L. Zhang et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 48 (2007) 3273–3275
3275
4 was coupled with side chain 3,3 then de-protected to
provide target compound 2 following the known
procedures.9
Xu, L.; Kim, C. U. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 5871; (e)
Lin, P.; Ganesan, A. Synthesis 2000, 14, 2127.
3. (a) Brands, M.; Endermann, R.; Gahlmann, R.; Kruger, J.;
Raddatz, S. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2003, 13, 241; (b)
Brands, M.; Grande, Y. C.; Endermann, R.; Gahlmann, R.;
Kruger, J.; Raddatz, S. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2003, 13,
2641; (c) Brands, M.; Endermann, R.; Gahlmann, R.;
Kruger, J.; Raddatz, S.; Stoltefub, J.; Belov, V. N.;
Nizamov, S.; Sokolov, V. V.; Meijere, A. D. J. Med.
Chem. 2002, 45, 4246.
In summary, we developed a new methodology for the
construction of 3,6-diamino-1,2,3,4-tetrahydropyridine-
4-one, which is also suitable for the preparation of other
amino tetrahydropyridine-4-ones. Compound 2, a novel
carbon analog at the N-3 position of TAN-1057A/B,
was synthesized using this facile approach for the tetra-
hydropyridone scaffold. Studies indicated that the het-
erocycle core of 2 was stable to hydrolysis in both
acidic and basic media, in which TAN-1057 A/B experi-
enced decomposition. Its biological data will be reported
in a future publication.
4. Williams, R.; Yuan, C.; Lee, V.; Chamberland, S. J.
Antibiot. 1998, 51, 189.
5. Lounasmaa, M.; Hanhien, P. Heterocycles 1996, 43, 1981.
6. Kim, S.; Lee, J. I.; Kim, Y. C. J. Org. Chem. 1985, 50, 560.
7. (a) Rathke, M. W.; Cowan, P. J. J. Org. Chem. 1985, 50,
2622; (b) Rathke, M. W.; Nowak, M. A. Synth. Commun.
1985, 15, 1039; (c) Clay, R. J.; Collom, T. A.; Karrick, G.
L.; Wemple, J. Synthesis 1993, 290.
8. Experimental procedures for tetrahydropyridone 16: To a
solution of 15 (1.3 g, 2.69 mmol) in acetonitrile (20 ml) was
added MgBr2–Et2O (2.1 g, 8.1 mmol), followed by a slow
addition of triethylamine (1.1 g, 10.9 mmol). The reaction
mixture was stirred at room temperature for 16 h, and
evaporated to a small volume. The residue was partitioned
between ethyl acetate and 0.2 N HCl. The organic phase
was washed with water and NaHCO3, dried over MgSO4,
filtered, and concentrated under reduced pressure. The
residue was purified by chromatography on silica gel (eluted
with 1:1 hexane/ethyl acetate) to give compound 16 as a
colorless solid (0.7 g, 57.7%). 1H NMR (CDCl3) d 12.95 (br
s, 1H), 10.05 (br s, 1H), 7.3–7.6 (m, 10H), 5.1–5.5 (m, 4H),
5.0/4.75 (m, 1H), 3.8 (m, 2H), 3.0 (s, 3H), 2.3 (s, 3H). MS
(M+Na)+: 474.3.
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. Ke-Yu Wang for performing NMR stud-
ies on the key intermediates and final compounds, and
Drs. Randy Vivian and Christopher Lee for their assis-
tance in preparation of this manuscript.
References and notes
1. (a) Katayama, N.; Fukusumi, S.; Funabashi, Y.; Iwahi, T.;
Ono, H. J. Antibiot. 1993, 46, 606; (b) Funabashi, Y.;
Tsubotani, S.; Koyama, K.; Katayama, N.; Harada, S.
Tetrahedron 1993, 49, 13.
2. (a) Yuan, C.; Williams, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119,
11777; (b) Sokolov, V. V.; Kozhushkov, S. I.; Nikolskaya,
S.; Belov, V. N.; Es-Sayed, M.; Meijere, A. D. Eur. J. Org.
Chem. 1998, 777; (c) Xu, L.; Zhang, L.; Bryant, C. M.;
Kim, C. U. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 2601; (d) Zhang, L.;
9. Spectra data for compound 2 (diastereomeric mixture ꢀ1:2):
1H NMR (DMSO-d6) d 10.87/10.76 (d, J = 8 Hz, 0.35H, s,
0.65H), 8.7/8.6 (s, 1H), 8.05 (br s, 2H), 7.9 (m, 1H), 7.3 (br
s, 3H), 4.95/4.75 (m, 1H), 4.65/4.42 (s, 0.65H; m, 0.35H),
3.4–3.7 (m, 3H), 3.1 (m, 2H), 2.8/2.65 (s, 3H), 2.5–2.8 (m,
2H), 2.05 (s, 3H), 1.6 (m, 4H). MS (M+1)+: 354.2.