peracetic acid giving alcohol 9 in 74% yield for two steps.
Protection of the primary alcohol as the tert-butyldiphenyl-
silyether, Dibal-H reduction of the methyl ester to the primary
alcohol, and subsequent treatment with (PhO)3P+CH3I- in
DMF gave alkyl iodide 10 (77% yield over three steps).
Iodide 10 was then alkylated (97%) by treatment with the
lithium anion of dithiane 11 in a THF/HMPA (10:1) solvent
system.12 At this stage it was necessary to unveil the R,â-
unsaturated ketone 13. This proved to be challenging, and
after an extensive review of conditions that promote the
removal of dithiane protecting groups, it was discovered that
treamtent of 12 with Dess-Martin periodinane in wet
methanol for 12 h afforded R,â-unsaturated ketone 13 in
good yield.13 Subsequent reduction of ketone 13 with a
catalytic amount of Corey’s chiral borane, (S)-CBS (14), in
the presence of BH3‚SMe2, cleanly installed the C17 stereo-
center (80%, dr ≈ 15:1).14 Protection of the emerged allylic
alcohol as the benzyl ether (BnBr, n-Bu4NI, DMF, 90%) and
deprotection of the primary silyl ether (TBAF, 99%),
followed by Dess-Martin oxidation15 of the resulting
primary alcohol (80%), afforded the aldehyde, completing
the synthesis of intermediate 3.
sium bromide in the presence of 20 mol % CuI provided
â-hydroxy ketone 17 (75%). Subsequent treatment of 17 with
Zn(BH4)216 in CH2Cl2 at -78 °C afforded a 1,3-syn reduction
to the 1,3-diol (80%, dr > 15:1). This material was then
treated with 2,2-dimethoxypropane in the presence of a
catalytic amount of p-TsOH, which provided acetonide 18.
Completion of 4 was accomplished by cleavage of the
terminal olefin by ozonolysis giving ketone 19, which, when
treated the bulky lithium anion of 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperi-
dine, gave the desired regiochemical enolate, which was then
trapped with TMS-Cl, completing the C1-C8 silyl enol
ether coupling partner 4.
To undertake the assembly of the C1-C22 fragment 2, a
Mukaiyama aldol between aldehyde 3 and silyl enol ether 4
was investigated. After a brief survey of the reaction, it was
determined that the coupling was best effected by treatment
of a mixture of 3 and 4 in CH2Cl2 with BF3‚OEt2 at -78 °C
for 4 h (Scheme 5). Gratifyingly, the coupling proceeded in
Scheme 5. Synthesis of the C1-C22 Fragment 2a
Synthesis of the C1-C8 silyl enol ether 4 began with
enantiomerically pure epoxide (S)-6 readily available in
multigram quantities from HKR of (() 6 (Scheme 4).
Scheme 4. Synthesis of Silyl Enol Ether 4a
a Key: (a) (ii) BF3‚OEt2, CH2Cl2, -78 °C, 81% dr > 15:1; (ii)
Me3OBF4, Proton Sponge, 4 Å molecular sieves, CH2Cl2, rt, 99%.
good yield (81%) and diastereoselectivity (dr > 15:1).
Despite the monodentate nature of BF3‚OEt2, there is ample
precedent for 1,3-anti induction in similar systems.17 The
absolute stereochemistry at C9 was unambiguously assigned
using the method of Mosher.18 The methylation of the C9
hydroxyl was then accomplished by treatment with Meer-
wein’s reagent and Proton sponge (99%) giving the C1-
C22 fragment 2.19
a Key: (a) tert-butyl acetate, LDA, THF, -50 °C, 70%. (b)
Isopropenylmagnesium bromide, 20 mol % CuI, THF, -50 °C,
75%. (c) (i) Zn(BH4)2, CH2Cl2, -78 °C, 80%, dr > 15:1; (ii) 2,2-
dimethoxypropane, cat. p-TsOH, rt, 99%. (d) O3, MeOH, Me2S,
-78 °C, 95%. (e) Lithium tetramethylpiperidine, TMSCl, -78 °C,
77%.
Treatment of (S)-6 with the lithium anion of tert-butyl acetate
in THF at -50 °C gave the unstable â-ketoester 16 in 70%
yield. Subsequent treatment of 16 with isopropenylmagne-
(15) (a) Dess, D. B.; Martin, J. C. J. Org. Chem. 1983, 48, 4155-4156.
(b) Dess, D. B.; Martin, J. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 7277-7287.
(16) For reviews on the synthetic applications of zinc borohydride, see:
(a) Narasimhan, S.; Balakumar, R. Aldrichimica Acta 1998, 31, 19-27.
(b) Hoyveda, A. H.; Evans, D. A.; Fu, G. C. Chem. ReV. 1993, 1307-
1370. (c) Evans, D. A.; Kim, A. S.; Metternich, R.; Novack, V. J. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 5921-5942.
(12) For leading references on dithiane alkylation, see: Smith, A. B.;
Boldi, A. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 6925-6926. and references
therein.
(13) For an initial communication and discussion of this reaction, see:
Langille, N. F.; Dakin, L. A.; Panek, J. S. Org. Lett. 2003, 4, 575-578.
(14) (a) Corey, E. J.; Bakshi, R. K.; Shibata, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987,
109, 5551-5553. (b) Corey, E. J.; Bakshi, R. K. Tetrahedron Lett. 1990,
31, 611-614. (c) Corey, E. J.; Helal, C. J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1998,
37, 1986-2012.
(17) (a) Evans, D. A.; Duffy, J. L.; Dart, M. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994,
35, 8537-8540. (b) Paterson, I.; Smith, J. D. J. Org. Chem. 1992, 57, 3261-
3264.
(18) (a) Dale, J. A.; Mosher, H. S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1973, 96, 512-
519. (b) Trost, B. M.; Belletire, J. L.; Godleski, S.; McDougal, D. G.;
Balkovec, J. M.; Baldwin, J. J.; Christy, M. E.; Ponticello, G. S.; Varga, S.
L.; Springer, J. P. J. Org. Chem. 1986, 51, 2370-2374.
Org. Lett., Vol. 5, No. 21, 2003
3997