I. Rojo et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 16 (2006) 191–195
195
8. For a review on this subject, see: John, V.; Beck, J. P.;
Bienkowski, M. J.; Sinha, S.; Heinrikson, R. I. J. Med.
Chem. 2003, 46, 4625.
Glu side chain of OM99-2. These factors appear to be
less important for increasing potency of 7 relative to 1.
9. (a) Lamar, J.; Hu, J.; Bueno, A. B.; Yang, H.; Guo, D.;
Copp, J. D.; McGee, J.; Gitter, B.; Timm, D.; May, P.;
McCarthy, J.; Chen, S. Biorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2004, 14,
239; (b) Lamar, J.; Hu, J.; Yang, H.; Khon, T. D.; Copp,
J. D.; McGee, J.; Timm, D.; Erikson, J.; May, P.;
McCarthy, J.; Chen, S. Biorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2004,
14, 245.
10. Tyndall, J. D. A.; Reid, R. C.; Tyssen, D. P.; Jardine, D.
K.; Todd, B.; Passmore, M.; March, D. R.; Pattenden, L.
K.; Bergman, D. A.; Alewood, P. F.; Birch, C. J.; Martin,
J. L.; Fairlie, D. P. J. Med. Chem. 2000, 43, 3495.
11. (a) Cumming, J. N.; Iserloh, U.; Kennedy, E. M. Curr.
Opin. Drug Discov. Dev. 2004, 7(4), 536(b) ELAN
The design and synthesis of 2–7, macrocyclic analogs of
the BACE1 inhibitor 1, provide further insight into the
preferred binding mode for 1 obtained from the crystal
structure of BACE1 complexed with 7. The X-ray struc-
ture showed that compound 7, obtained by cyclization
between N2-P1, was able to maintain the backbone
structure of OM99-2, and at the same time illustrates
the importance of an efficient occupancy of the S1 bind-
ing site in terms of potency. Also, the work demon-
strates that the N2–H in the peptidic structure is not a
required feature for binding to BACE1. Continued work
on the improvement of macrocyclic BACE1 inhibitors
will be published in due course.
PHARMACEUTICALS/PHARMACIA
& UPJOHN.
Macrocycles useful in the treatment of AlzheimerÕs
disease. WO-02100399 (2002).
12. Ghosh, A. K.; Davasamudram, T.; Hong, L.; DeZutter,
C.; Xu, X.; Weerasena, V.; Koelsch, G.; Bilcer, G.; Tang,
J. J. Biorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2005, 15, 15.
Acknowledgments
13. Docking analysis carried out with in-house algorithm,
CDOCKER, to the BACE/OM99-2 X-ray structure (Ref.
7). See: (a) Vieth, M.; Hirst, J. D.; Kolinski, A.; Brooks, C.
L., III J. Comp. Chem. 1998, 19, 1612; (b) Vieth, M.; Hirst,
J. D.; Dominy, B. N.; Daigler, H.; Brooks, C. L., III J.
Comp. Chem. 1998, 19, 1623; (c) Vieth, M.; Cummins, D.
J. J. Med. Chem. 2000, 43, 3020; (d) Wu, G.; Robertson,
D. H.; Brooks, C. L., III; Vieth, M. J. Comp. Chem. 2003,
24, 1549; (e) Erickson, J. A.; Jalaie, M.; Robertson, D. H.;
Lewis, R. A.; Vieth, M. J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47, 45.
14. Dunn, M. J.; Jackson, R.; Pietruszka, J.; Turner, D.
J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 2210.
15. Brady, S. F.; Sisko, J. T.; Stauffer, K. J.; Colton, C. D.;
Qiu, H.; Lewis, S. D.; Assunta, S. Ng.; Shafer, J. A.;
Bogusky, M. J.; Veber, D. F.; Nutt, R. F. Biorg. Med.
Chem. 1995, 3, 1063.
16. Decamp, A. E.; Kawaguchi, A. T.; Volante, R. P.;
Shinkai, I. Tetrahedron Lett. 1991, 32, 1867.
The authors acknowledge Patrick May for his input
and critical review of the manuscript, Richard A. Brier,
Debra Kay Laigle and James E. McGee for their work
in the whole cell assay, and Raquel Torres for her work
in the biochemical assay.
References and notes
1. Janus, C. CNS Drugs 2003, 17, 457.
2. Evans, D. A.; Funkenstein, H. H.; Albert, M. S., et al.
JAMA 1989, 262, 2551.
3. (a) Selkoe, D. J. Physiol. Rev. 2001, 81, 741; (b) Selkoe, D.
J. Nature 1999, 99, A23.
4. Hartmann, D.; Tournoy, J.; Saftig, P.; Annaert, W.; De
Strooper, B. J. Mol. Neurosci. 2001, 17, 171.
5. Luo, Y.; Bolon, B.; Khan, S., et al. Nat. Neuroscience
2001, 4, 231.
6. Vassar, R. et al. Science 1999, 286, 734.
7. Hong, L.; Koelsch, G.; Lin, X.; Wu, S.; Terzyan, S.;
Ghsoh, A. K.; Zhang, X. C.; Tang, J. Science 2000, 290,
150.
17. Reichwein, J. F.; Liskamp, R. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998,
39, 1243.
18. Craparo, H. G. et al. Arch. Pharm. Med. Chem. 1996, 329,
273.
19. Ghosh, A. K. et al. J. Med. Chem. 2001, 44, 2865.