C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Scheme 2
Table 2. Results of Low-Conversion Photolyses of Diazirine (2) in
Methanol at Different Wavelengths
wavelength of irradiation λ (nm)
product
254
300
350
Fraction in Products Mixture
1
3
4
0.04
0.93
0.02
0.44
0.56
0.002
0.36
0.63
0.01
state is very rapid, evidenced by the fact that no fluorescence or
phosphorescence is observed. A small fraction of S1 population
(ca. 3%) undergoes isomerization into diazirine 2. We believe that
this reaction proceeds from the excited-state S1 rather than from
“hot” ground state as thermal reaction of 1 does not produce
diazirine 2 and DFT calculations predict isomerization to be much
slower than the Wolff rearrangement.6
of R,R′-dicarbonyl diazirine 2. The results of photolysis at 300 nm
are especially indicative. At 300 nm diazirine 2 and diazo
Meldrum’s acid (1) have very similar extinction coefficients (19
and 23 M-1 cm-1, respectively), and at low conversion of starting
diazirine 2 absorbs practically all light. The photodecomposition
of 1 becomes noticeable only when the conversion reaches ca. 30%.
The Wolff rearrangement of diazirine 2 apparently proceeds via
a dicarbonyl carbene. The absence of O-H insertion products, on
the other hand, indicates an extremely short lifetime of this
intermediate. The rate of reaction of structurally similar dicar-
The short-wavelength irradiation of diazo Meldrum’s acid results
in the formation of a higher excited state, most probably S2. The
major component of this excitation is HOMO-1 to LUMO transition.
The HOMO-1 is a nonbonding orbital localized on carbonyl
oxygens, which lies in the plane of diazocarbonyl fragment and
has a good and in-phase overlap with LUMO. This excited state
undergoes an extremely rapid loss of nitrogen. For the latter reaction
to compete efficiently with an internal conversion (φ254 ) 0.34), it
should proceed at 1012 s-1 or a faster rate.1b The rest of the excited
molecules undergo internal conversion to S1, participation of which
is evident from the formation of small amounts of diazirine 2, before
falling onto the ground-state surface. The much higher quantum
yield of 254 nm photolysis, on the other hand, provides an argument
against the formation of a Wolff rearrangement product from a “hot”
S1. According to MP2 calculations corresponding dicarbonyl
carbene lies in a very shallow energy well (<1 kcal M-1), indicating
that Wolff rearrangement of 1 is essentially a concerted process.5
The laser flash photolysis of the diazo Meldrum’s acid (1)
conducted at 248 nm using KrF laser demonstrated that the
formation of a corresponding ketene was complete during the laser
pulse (ca 20 ns).9 This allows us to estimate the lower rate limit
bomethoxycarbene with methanol is 1.5 × 109 M-1 s-1 11
. This value
allows us to estimate the lower rate limit for the Wolff rearrange-
ment of the cyclic dicarbonyl carbene at 1011 s-1
.
The thermal reaction of diazirine 2 results in quantitative reverse
isomerization to diazo Meldrum’s acid. Theoretical analysis of the
ground-state reactivity of the diazirine 2 shows that isomerization
to 1 is the only feasible process.
Acknowledgment. We are grateful to the National Institutes
of Health for partial support of this project (CA91856-01A1). A.B.
thanks the McMaster Endowment for research fellowship.
Supporting Information Available: Preparation, photolysis, quan-
tum yield measurements, and spectral data for compounds 1-3;
Gaussian 98 output files for DFT calculations. (PDF). This material is
References
(1) (a) Turro, N. J.; Ramamurthy, V.; Cherry, W.; Farneth, W. Chem. ReV.
1978, 78, 125. (b) Turro, N. J. Modern molecular photochemistry;
Benjamin/Cummings: Menlo Park, 1978.
for the photo-Wolff rearrangement of 1 at 108 s-1
.
The triplet sensititized photolysis of 1 results in a quantitative
formation of Meldrum’s acid (4). This observation is in line with
the accepted mechanism of photochemical reduction of R-diazo-
carbonyl compounds through triplet carbonylcarbene intermediate.10
The absence of the ketoester 3 in reaction mixtures of the triplet
sensitized photolyses indicate that the spin equilibration of this
carbene is much slower than the reaction of the triplet state with
methanol. The small amounts of Meldrum’s acid found in direct
photolyses of 1 is apparently due to the low efficiency intersystem
crossing yielding triplet excited state of 1.
UV irradiation of diazirino Meldrum’s acid (2) results in the
processes similar to that observed in photolysis of its diazo
isomer: Wolff rearrangement to produce ketoester 3, isomerization
to 1, and formal reduction to 4 (Scheme 2).
The composition of product mixtures in the photolysis of
diazirine 2 also depends on the wavelength of irradiation. This
dependence, however, is less pronounced: the ketoester 3 is always
the major product, while the yield of diazo compound 1 increases
at longer wavelength (Table 2). The product ratios shown in the
Table 2 were obtained at ca. 10% conversion of the starting material.
Analysis of the data summarized in Table 2 allows us to conclude
that ketoester 3 can be formed directly in the Wolff rearrangement
(2) Reactions originating from higher excited states are more common in
organometallic chemistry: Lees, A. J. Coord. Chem. ReV. 2001, 211, 255.
(3) (a) Murata, S.; Kobayashi, J.; Kongou, C.; Miyata, M.; Matsushita, T.;
Tomioka, H. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 6082. (b) Rau, H.; Bokel, M. J.
Photochem. Photobiol. A 1990, 53, 311. (c) Li, Y.-Z.; Schuster, G. B. J.
Org. Chem. 1987, 52, 4460. (d) Baumann, N. HelV. Chim. Acta 1972,
55, 2716. (e) Do Minh, T.; Strausz, O. P.; Gunning, H. E. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1969, 91, 1261.
(4) Preparation of compounds 1, 2, and 3 is presented in the Supporting
Information.
(5) Bogdanova, A.; Popik V. V. Manuscript in preparation.
(6) The results of DFT calculations are presented in the Supporting Informa-
tion.
(7) Photo-Wolff reaction of 1 in solution and polymer matrices has been
reported before: Lippert, T.; Koskelo, A.; Stoutland, P. O. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1996, 118, 1551; Fujiwara, H.; Nakajima, Y.; Fukumura, H.;
Masuhara, H. J. Phys. Chem. 1995, 99, 11481; Winnik, M. A.; Wang, F.;
Nivaggioli, T.; Hruska, Z.; Fukumura, H.; Masuhara, H. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1991, 113, 9702; Stevens, R. V.; Bisacchi, G. S.; Goldsmith, L.;
Strouse, C. E. J. Org. Chem. 1980, 45, 2708; Kammula, S. L.; Tracer, H.
L.; Shelvin, P. B.; Jones, M., Jr. J. Org. Chem. 1977, 42, 2931.
(8) Formation of small amounts of diazirine 2 in photolysis of 1 was reported
previously: Nikolaev, V. A.; Khimich, N. N.; Korobitsyna, I. K. Khim.
Geterotsikl. Soedin. 1985, 321; Livinghouse, T.; Stevens, R. V. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1978, 100, 6479.
(9) Kresge, A. J.; Popik V. V. ECTOC-1, June 1995.
(10) Kirmse, W. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 2193.
(11) Wang, J.-L.; Toscano, J. P.; Platz, M. S.; Nikolaev, V.; Popik, V. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 5477.
JA029528P
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 125, NO. 6, 2003 1457