F. Hong, E. Fan / Tetrahedron Letters 42 (2001) 6073–6076
6075
OAc
O
OH
AcO
AcO
HO
HO
H
N
H
N
ii, iii
O
AcOMe
+
R
R
OAc
OH
O
O
OAc
O
AcO
AcO
5
8
i
N3
OAc
OH
HO
HO
OAc
O
AcO
AcO
AcOMe
PBu3
ii, iii
1
O
NH2
+
N
PBu3
O
OH
OAc
10
9
Scheme 2. (i) RCO2H, n-Bu3P, CH2Cl2, rt; (ii) NaOMe/HOMe, rt; (iii) Dowex-H+, HOMe, rt.
perature (−78°C) can facilitate the formation of desired
amide products, while reaction at higher temperature
(such as room temperature) can lead to the non-pro-
ductive glycosylphosphazene derivatives (9 in Scheme
2). From a library synthesis point of view, we did not
attempt to run the library synthesis at −78°C in the
absence of specialized equipment. In our library synthe-
sis at room temperature, we did observe the formation
of significant amounts of galactosylphosphazene deriva-
tives. Despite the presence of large amounts of phos-
phazene by-products, our purification procedure can
efficiently remove these impurities. At a small expense
of the yield, the use of excess Dowex-H+ resin ensures
the breakdown of phosphazenes and the subsequent
trapping of generated amines.11 For efficient removal of
the remaining neutral organic by-products, we also
found that in addition to CH2Cl2, ethyl acetate can also
be used to perform extraction from water.
97, 347–509; For a comprehensive list of literatures
online, see: (c) Lebl, M.; Leblova, Z. Dynamic Database
of References in Molecular Diversity. Internet http://
2. (a) Kaldor, S. W.; Siegel, M. G.; Fritz, J. E.; Dressman,
B. A.; Hahn, P. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 7193; (b)
Flynn, D. L.; Crich, J. Z.; Devraj, R. J.; Hockerman, S.
L.; Parlow, J. J.; South, M. S.; Woodard, S. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 4878; (c) Brown, S. D.; Armstrong,
R. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 6331; (d) Booth, R.
J.; Hodges, J. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 4882.
3. (a) Boger, D. L.; Tarby, C. M.; Myers, P. L.; Caporale,
L. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 2109; (b) Cheng, S.;
Comer, D. D.; Williams, J. P.; Myers, P. L.; Boger, D. L.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 2567.
4. Nilsson, U. J.; Fournier, E. J.-L.; Hindsgaul, O. Bioorg.
Med. Chem. Lett. 1998, 6, 1563.
5. (a) Studer, A.; Hadida, S.; Ferritto, R.; Kim, S.-Y.; Jeger,
P.; Wipf, P.; Curran, D. P. Science 1997, 275, 823; (b)
Curran, D. P.; Hadida, S.; He, M. J. Org. Chem. 1997,
62, 6714; (c) Studer, A.; Curran, D. P. Tetrahedron 1997,
53, 6681; (d) Luo, Z.; Zhang, Q.; Oderaotoshi, Y.; Cur-
ran, D. P. Science 2001, 291, 1766.
6. (a) For a review on related AB5 toxins, see: Merritt, E.
A.; Hol, W. G. J. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 1995, 5,
165–171; (b) For the screening of the chemical libraries
reported here, see: Minke, W.; Hong, F.; Verlinde, C.;
Hol, W.; Fan, E. J. Biol. Chem. 1999, 274, 33469.
7. Bodanszky, M.; Bodanszky, A. The Practice of Peptides
Synthesis, 2nd ed.; Springer-Verlag: Berlin, 1994; pp.
75–126.
In summary, we have described a convenient approach
for the solution-phase synthesis of water-soluble galac-
toside libraries. By carefully choosing a reaction,
involving either organic-soluble or volatile reagents and
by-products, we have efficiently obtained water-soluble
pure galactoside derivatives through simple organic sol-
vent extraction, evaporation and lyophilization despite
of the low yielding nature of the reaction. The conve-
nience and efficiency might make such an approach a
useful alternative to the solution-phase library synthesis
of various water-soluble organic compounds.
8. (a) Inazu, T.; Kobayashi, K. Synlett 1993, 869; (b)
Mizuno, M.; Muramoto, I.; Kobayashi, K.; Yaginuma,
H.; Inazu, T. Synthesis 1999, 162; (c) Deras, I. L.;
Takegawa, K.; Kondo, A.; Kato, I.; Lee, Y. C. Bioorg.
Med. Chem. Lett. 1998, 8, 1763.
9. Typical procedure: To each acid (0.074 mmol) in a 1
dram glass vial was added 1 (25 mg, 0.067 mmol) in 1.5
ml of anhydrous CH2Cl2. After shaking for 5 min, n-
Bu3P (0.074 mmol) in 0.5 ml of CH2Cl2 was introduced
via a syringe through the cap. The resulting mixture was
shaken overnight at room temperature. All vials were
then placed in a desiccator that was connected to vacuum
to remove the solvent. To each residue in the same vial
was added 1.5 ml of methanol, followed by NaOMe/
Acknowledgements
We are grateful for support provided by the School of
Medicine of the University of Washington and the
National Institutes of Health (Grant AI44954). We also
thank Professor Wim Hol for helpful discussions.
References
1. For recent reviews, see the dedicated issues of: (a) Curr.
Opin. Chem. Biol. 1997, 1, 3–135; (b) Chem. Rev. 1997,