J. Boulanger et al. / Catalysis Communications 29 (2012) 77–81
81
in aldehydes and a poor regioselectivity (l/b=1.1). Thus, almost no
isomerization of the C_C double bond occurred during the catalytic
process, thus highlighting the selective ability of the catalyst to orient
the reaction towards the hydroformylation process. However, the low
l/b ratio clearly indicated that no preference was given to one or the
other alkenyl carbon for them to be functionalized by a formyl group.
Increasing the amount of 1 at 80 °C (Table 1, run 2) led to a huge
decrease in the conversion (from 100% to 8% within 150 min). As clearly
established above (see Section 3.4), a high-coordinated rhodium spe-
cies was probably formed with negative impact on the substrate com-
plexation. The significant drop in conversion was accompanied by a
slight decrease in chemoselectivity (90% aldehydes) and an increase
in regioselectivity (l/b=1.7). Increasing the temperature from 80 to
100 °C did not counterbalance the ligand effect as 23% conversion was
only reached within 150 min (Table 1, run 3). In that case, the aldehyde
proportion was slightly higher (95.0%) and the l/b ratio remained
constant (1.7). A similar trend was observed for 2 in terms of catalytic
activity. Thus, from 95% with 1 eq. 2 at 80 °C (Table 1, run 4), the con-
version dropped to 12 and 14% at 80 and 100 °C, respectively. While
the chemoselectivity was hardly impacted by variation of proportions
in 2 (in the range 95–98% aldehydes), the regioselectivity suffered
from an excess 2 in solution as a very low 0.9 l/b ratio was measured
using 2 eq. 2 at any temperature (Table 1, runs 5 and 6). When compar-
ing 1 and 2, no significant difference in catalytic performances could be
noticed. Thus, using a linear terminal alkene as substrate, the para- or
meta-position of the sulfonate groups had no real influence on the coor-
dination sphere. This conclusion was coherent with the geometry of the
Rh-complexes when coordinated by 1 or 2. Indeed, a structural study
carried out on non-sulfonated analogues of 1 and 2 showed the phenyl
groups to be far from the metallic center [17]. Consequently, the steric
hindrance around the metal was not high enough to discriminate the
two C_C carbons. To complete this series of experiments, the catalytic
behavior of 1 and 2 has been compared to a structurally close water-
soluble ligand, namely the well-known DPPPTS (tetra-sulfonated 1,3-
bis(diphenylphosphino)propane). DPPPTS has been chosen as its two
phosphorus atoms are distant from each other by four covalent bonds,
as observed for 1 and 2. Ligands 1 or 2 appeared to be as effective as
DPPPTS, either in terms of conversion or selectivities (run 7), thus
highlighting their bidentate nature during the course of the reaction.
The Rh-catalyzed hydroformylation has been widened to
acetoxystyrene (Table 1, runs 7 and 8). 83% and 78% of substrate were
converted at 80 °C under 50 bar CO/H2 within 150 min using 1 and 2,
respectively (Table 1, run 1 and 2). As observed for 3, the chemose-
lectivity was high (98% aldehydes). Contrary to what was usually
observed for terminal alkenes, it is well known that Rh-catalyzed
hydroformylation of styrene derivatives mainly led to branched alde-
hydes because of the formation, during the catalytic cycle, of a pseudo
π-allyl intermediate. In this context, it appeared that the Rh-catalyst
stabilized by 1 equiv 2 was more regioselective than that stabilized by
1 as higher proportions of branched aldehydes were formed (76% vs.
65%, respectively). As observed above for 3, conversion of 4 was
performed as efficiently using 1 or 2 than using DPPPTS, even if the
selectivity in branched aldehyde was somewhat lower with 1 or 2.
4. Conclusion
In this study, two new water-soluble diphosphadiazacyclooctane
derivatives have been synthesized using a straightforward two-step syn-
thetic procedure. They displayed a κ2-P,P coordination mode on rhodium
complexes. We demonstrated their potential in rhodium-catalyzed
hydroformylation of two terminal alkenes. The conversion proved to be
very dependent upon the phosphane/Rh ratio. A stoichiometric propor-
tion was optimized to yield high conversion. The high chemoselectivities
attainable in hydroformylation of terminal alkene derivatives con-
stitute without doubt one of the main advantages of these new
diphosphanes as water-soluble ligands. Extension of the use of
water-soluble diphosphadiazacyclooctane derivatives to other cata-
lytic reactions is currently on-going.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Centre National de la Recherche
Scientifique (CNRS).
Appendix A. Supplementary data
Supplementary data to this article can be found online at http://
References
[1] E.G. Kuntz, ChemTech (1987) 570.
[2] K.H. Shaughnessy, Chemical Reviews 109 (2009) 643.
[3] D.P. Curran, Angewandte Chemie International Edition 37 (1998) 1174.
[4] W. Leitner, Accounts of Chemistry Research 35 (2002) 746.
[5] D. Prajapati, M. Gohain, Tetrahedron 60 (2004) 815.
[6] M. Haumann, A. Riisager, Chemical Reviews 108 (2008) 1474.
[7] V. Pârvulescu, C. Hardacre, Chemical Reviews 107 (2007) 2615.
[8] C. Machut, J. Patrigeon, S. Tilloy, H. Bricout, F. Hapiot, E. Monflier, Angewandte
Chemie International Edition 46 (2007) 3040.
[9] H. Fu, M. Li, J. Chen, R. Zhang, W. Jiang, M. Yuan, H. Chen, X. Li, Journal of Molec-
ular Catalysis A: Chemistry 292 (2008) 21.
[10] M. Ferreira, H. Bricout, A. Sayede, A. Ponchel, S. Fourmentin, S. Tilloy, E. Monflier,
Advanced Synthesis and Catalysis 350 (2008) 609.
[11] S. Tilloy, F. Hapiot, D. Landy, S. Fourmentin, V. Michelet, J.P. Genêt, E. Monflier, Ad-
vanced Synthesis and Catalysis 348 (2006) 1547.
[12] C. Machut-Binkowski, F.X. Legrand, N. Azaroual, S. Tilloy, E. Monflier, Chemistry–
A European Journal (2010) 10195.
[13] H. Bricout, E. Banaszak, C. Len, F. Hapiot, E. Monflier, Chemical Communications
46 (2010) 7813.
[14] D. Ngan Tran, F.X. Legrand, S. Menuel, H. Bricout, S. Tilloy, E. Monflier, Chemical
Communications 48 (2012) 753.
[15] A. Fihri, D. Luart, C. Len, A. Solhy, C. Chevrin, V. Polshettiwar, Dalton Transactions
40 (2011) 3116.
[16] M. Ferreria, H. Bricout, A. Sayede, F. Hapiot, S. Tilloy, E. Monflier, ChemSusChem 1
(2008) 631.
[17] S. Otto, A. Ionescu, A. Roodt, Journal of Organometallic Chemistry 690 (2005)
4337.