10.1002/chem.201803540
Chemistry - A European Journal
COMMUNICATION
shape, it is apparently not appropriate when both tensor orienta-
tion and shape change to a degree as seen here before and
after the helix inversion, as it does not reflect the differences
observed in the experimental RDCs and thus doesn’t allow for a
quantitative analysis. Thus we suggest using the full range for β
(0° .. +180°) in such cases. In the previous example, the proper
result would thus be β = 172.2°, indicating an almost anti-parallel
tensor orientation in 5D,[42] again with a small orientational dif-
ferentiation. As noted above, however, this value does not nec-
essarily encode solely for a large difference in tensor orientation,
but is a composite of differences in all tensor parameters (see SI
for further explanation).
In contrast to this rather small difference in orientation in 5D
before and after helix reversal (domains (A) and (C),
respectively), we obtained a significant difference of β = 44°
when comparing the orientations of the analyte in the domains
(C) and (E) after the helix reversal (see Figure 3 and SI).
Furthermore, we were interested in solute compatibility and
whether the same behavior can also be observed for other com-
pounds. Thus we examined various analytes with a wide range
of functional groups like isopinocampheol (IPC), carvone, cam-
phor, camphorsultam and perillic acid. All allow for RDC extrac-
tion and display similar results concerning the inter-temperature
comparison (including the sign change in 1H-13C RDCs and
rhombicities after helix reversal (for details see SI)). Additionally,
we investigated a non-racemic mixture of both enantiomers of
IPC. For some of the signals, the high enantiodifferentiation and
spectra quality allows for a direct observation of baseline sepa-
rated multiplets (for details see SI).
Fährmann for synthesizing
like to thank the DFG and FOR1583 for financial support.
D
-copolymer. The authors would also
Keywords: polyaspartates • LLC phase • helix reversal • residual dipolar
couplings • NMR spectroscopy • alignment media
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
C. M. Thiele, Concepts Magn. Reson. A 2007, 30A, 65-80.
G. Kummerlöwe, B. Luy, TrAC, Trends Anal. Chem. 2009, 28, 483-493.
V. Schmidts, Magn. Reson. Chem. 2017, 55, 54-60.
D. Neuhaus, M. P. Williamson, The Nuclear Overhauser Effect in
Structural and Conformational Analysis, Wiley-VCH, New York, 2000.
F. A. L. Anet, A. J. R. Bourn, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1965, 87, 5250-5251.
A. W. Overhauser, Phys. Rev. 1953, 92, 411-415.
[5]
[6]
[7]
C. A. G. Haasnoot, F. A. A. M. de Leeuw, C. Altona, Tetrahedron 1980,
36, 2783-2792.
[8]
[9]
M. Karplus, J. Chem. Phys. 1959, 30, 11-15.
J. C. Freudenberger, P. Spiteller, R. Bauer, H. Kessler, B. Luy, J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 14690-14691.
[10] G. Kummerlöwe, J. Auernheimer, A. Lendlein, B. Luy, J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2007, 129, 6080-6081.
[11] C. Gayathri, N. V. Tsarevsky, R. R. Gil, Chem. Eur. J. 2010, 16, 3622-
3626.
[12] L. F. Gil-Silva, R. Santamaría-Fernández, A. Navarro-Vázquez, R. R.
Gil, Chem. Eur. J. 2016, 22, 472-476.
[13] M. Sarfati, P. Lesot, D. Merlet, J. Courtieu, Chem. Comm. 2000, 2069-
2081.
[14] A. Marx, C. Thiele, Chem. Eur. J. 2009, 15, 254-260.
[15] L. Arnold, A. Marx, C. M. Thiele, M. Reggelin, Chem. Eur. J. 2010, 16,
10342-10346.
[16] N.-C. Meyer, A. Krupp, V. Schmidts, C. M. Thiele, M. Reggelin, Angew.
Chem. 2012, 124, 8459-8463.
[17] A. Krupp, M. Reggelin, Magn. Reson. Chem. 2012, 50, 45-52.
[18] A. Meddour, I. Canet, A. Loewenstein, J. M. Pechine, J. Courtieu, J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 9652-9656.
In summary, we have synthesized
molecular weight copolymers of 50.6% poly-β-phenethyl-
aspartate and 49.4% poly-γ-benzyl- -aspartate. It shows out-
D- and L-configured high
L-
[19] P. Lesot, M. Sarfati, J. Courtieu, Chem. Eur. J. 2003, 9, 1724-1745.
[20] P. Lesot, J. Courtieu, Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc. 2009, 55,
128-159.
L
standing enantiodifferentiating alignment properties comprising
high-quality CLIP-HSQC spectra with narrow and nicely sepa-
rated signals. In contrast to the homopolypeptides PBLG, PELG
and PPLA which show a higher enantiodifferentiation of β-
pinene than IPC,[31] the copolymer enantiodifferentiates IPC (β ~
65°) better than β-pinene (β ~ 50°) at 300 K (for RDCs and
orientational properties of IPC see SI). Additionally, the ther-
moresponsivity of the copolymer enables the measurement of
RDCs before and after the helix reversal which is accompanied
with a sign change in almost all RDCs. Finally, the copolymer
aligns the investigated analytes in at least two different orienta-
tions. As to how far these orientations are linearly independent
and how many different orientations may indeed be obtained,
needs to be examined in further studies. The copolymer of
PBLA/PPLA as well as the homopolymer PPLA show that by
simply changing parameters like temperature or building blocks
contribute to a great diversity of alignment media, inducing very
different orientations. Subsequently, this may contribute to the
general aim of a model-free structure elucidation.[43]
[21] R. Berger, J. Courtieu, R. R. Gil, C. Griesinger, M. Köck, P. Lesot, B.
Luy, D. Merlet, A. Navarro-Vázquez, M. Reggelin, U. M. Reinscheid, C.
M. Thiele, M. Zweckstetter, Angew. Chem. 2012, 124, 8512-8515.
[22] G. Kummerlöwe, M. U. Kiran, B. Luy, Chem. Eur. J. 2009, 15, 12192-
12195.
[23] M. Schmidt, H. Sun, A. Leonov, C. Griesinger, U. M. Reinscheid, Magn.
Reson. Chem. 2012, 50, S38-S44.
[24] T. Montag, C. M. Thiele, Chem. Eur. J. 2013, 2271-2274.
[25] X. Lei, G.-W. Li, J.-M. Cao, W. Zong, L. Hu, M.-L. Hu, R. X. Tan, H. Sun,
Chem. Eur. J. 2017, 10.1002/chem.201700539.
[26] M. Schwab, D. Herold, C. M. Thiele, Chem. Eur. J. 2017, 23, 14576-
14584.
[27] A. Abe, S. Okamoto, N. Kimura, K. Tamura, H. Onigawara, J.
Watanabe, Acta Polym. 1993, 44, 54-56.
[28] Y. Imada, A. Abe, Polymer 2010, 51, 6227-6233.
[29] M. D. Zotti, F. Formaggio, M. Crisma, C. Peggion, A. Moretto, C.
Toniolo, J. Pept. Sci. 2014, 20, 307-322.
[30] A. Abe, K. Hiraga, Y. Imada, T. Hiejima, H. Furuya, J. Pept. Sci. 2005,
80, 249-257.
[31] S. Hansmann, T. Larem, C. M. Thiele, Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2016, 2016,
1324-1329.
[32] A. Enthart, J. C. Freudenberger, J. Furrer, H. Kessler, B. Luy, J. Magn.
Reson. 2008, 192, 314-322.
Acknowledgements
[33] R. Berger, C. Fischer, M. Klessinger, J. Phys. Chem. A 1998, 102,
7157-7167.
The authors thank Timo Imhof for help with synthesizing
copolymer and some of the NMR measurements, and Jan
L-
[34] C. M. Thiele, V. Schmidts, B. Böttcher, I. Louzao, R. Berger, A. Maliniak,
B. Stevensson, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 6708-6712.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.