pseudoenantiomeric lithium amides in a parallel kinetic resolu-
tion14 is expected to eliminate the deleterious effect of mass
action during the resolution process. A further advantage of this
protocol is elimination of the inherent sensitivity of the e.e. of
product and substrate to conversion, since each kinetic
resolution automatically stops at 50% conversion, giving the
products with improved e.e. (S)-2 (98% e.e.)15 and (R)-N-
3,4-dimethoxybenzyl-N-a-methylbenzylamide 6 (98% e.e.)15
were chosen as the components of the pseudoracemic mixture
required for this protocol, as they show complementary
stereoselectivity upon addition to achiral a,b-unsaturated
acceptors.16 Furthermore, it was predicted that the polar nature
of the N-3,4-dimethoxybenzyl protecting group would facilitate
the separation of the b-amino ester products arising from
conjugate addition.17 Thus, (RS)-1 (1 eq.) in THF was added to
a 50 : 50 mixture of amides (S)-2 (1.5 eq.) : (R)-6 (1.5 eq.) in
THF and stirred for two hours prior to the addition of NH4Cl
(aq.). Examination of the 1H NMR spectra of the crude reaction
mixture showed a 50 : 50 mixture of b-amino esters
(1R,2S,5S,aS)-3 (identical by 1H NMR to that arising from both
the mutual and kinetic resolution protocols) and (1S,2R,5R,aR)-
718 in 98 ± 1% d.e. in each case, consistent with E > 65 for each
process. Chromatographic purification enabled the isolation of
the two readily separable b-amino esters 3 and 7 in 39 and 35%
yield respectively, and in 98 ± 1% d.e. in each case. Subsequent
N-debenzylation of (1R,2S,5S,aS)-3 by hydrogenolysis gave b-
amino ester (1R,2S,5S)-4 in 75% yield, 98% d.e. and 96 ± 1%
other cases (R = iPr, Ph, Mes), and the extension of this
methodology for the synthesis of a range of 3-, 4- and 5-alkyl
substituted cispentacin analogues is currently under investiga-
tion within our laboratory.
The authors wish to thank Pfizer for an industrial CASE
award (J. M. W.), the Rhodes Trust (M. J. S.), New College,
Oxford for a Junior Research Fellowship (A. D. S.) and the
CICYT, Junta de Castilla y Leon and FSE for financial support
(SA 036/01).
Notes and references
1 For a review on the chemistry of this class of b-amino acid see F. Fülöp,
Chem. Rev., 2001, 2181; for selected syntheses see S. G. Davies, O.
Ichihara, I. Lenoir and I. A. S. Walters, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1,
1994, 1411; V. K. Aggarwal, S. J. Roseblade, J. K. Barrell and R.
Alexander, Org. Lett., 2002, 4, 1227.
2 For biological activity of the parent compound see M. Konishi, M.
Nishio, K. Saitoh, T. Miyaki, T. Oki and H. Kawaguchi, J. Antibiot.,
1989, 42, 1749; T. Oki, M. Hirano, K. Tomatsu, K. Numata and H.
Kamei, J. Antibiot., 1989, 42, 1756. For the secondary structure of
oligomers of cispentacin see T. A. Martinek, G. K. Táth, E. Vass, M.
Hollósi and F. Fülöp, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2002, 41, 1718.
3 S. G. Davies, N. M. Garrido, O. Ichihara and I. A. S. Walters, Chem.
Commun., 1993, 1153; S. G. Davies, O. Ichihara and I. A. S. Walters,
Synlett, 1993, 461; S. G. Davies, O. Ichihara, I. Lenoir and I. A. S.
Walters, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1, 1994, 1411.
4 S. Bailey, S. G. Davies, A. D. Smith and J. M. Withey, Chem. Commun.,
2002, 2910; M. Bunnage, A. M. Chippindale, S. G. Davies, R. M.
Parkin, A. D. Smith and J. M. Withey, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2003, 1,
DOI: 10.1039/b306935b.
5 For excellent reviews on the subject of kinetic resolution see H. B.
Kagan and J. C. Fiaud, Top. Stereochem., 1988, 18, 249; H. B. Kagan,
Tetrahedron, 2001, 57, 2449.
e.e.12 {[a]D 27.5 (c 1.0, CHCl3)}, while N-deprotection of
24
(1S,2R,5R,aR)-7 via oxidative deprotection with DDQ and
subsequent hydrogenolysis gave b-amino ester (1S,2R,5R)-4 in
43% yield (over two steps), 98% d.e. and 97 ± 1% e.e.12 {[a]D24
+7.6 (c 1.2, CHCl3)} (Scheme 3).
6 V. Dambrin, M. Villiéras, P. Janvier, L. Toupet, H. Amri, J. Lebreton
and J. Villiéras, Tetrahedron, 2001, 57, 2155.
7 The concept that mutual kinetic resolution allows the true E value for a
process to be evaluated was first proposed by A. C. R. Horeau,
Tetrahedron, 1975, 31, 1307.
8 J. F. Costello, S. G. Davies and O. Ichihara, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry,
1994, 5, 3919.
9 (S)-N-Benzyl-N-a-methylbenzylamine used in the kinetic resolution
protocol was prepared by reductive amination of commercially
available a-methylbenzylamine and subsequent recrystallisation of its
HCl salt; an e.e. of > 99% was established by 1H NMR chiral shift
experiments with (S)-O-acetyl mandelic acid and comparison with an
authentic racemic standard.
10 As determined by chiral shift 1H NMR experiments using Eu(hfc)3 and
comparison with an authentic racemic sample.
11 E was calculated using the kinetic resolution calculation developed by
magnus/); for further information see J. M. Goodman, A.-M. Köhler and
S. C. M. Alderton, Tetrahedron Lett., 1999, 40, 8715.
12 As indicated by derivatisation with homochiral and racemic Mosher’s
1
acid chlorides and comparison of the H and 19F NMR spectra of the
Scheme 3 Reagents and conditions: (i) (S)-2 (1.5 eq.), (R)-6 (1.5 eq.), THF,
278 °C then NH4Cl (aq.); (ii) Pd(OH)2 on C, MeOH, H2 (5atm), rt; (iii)
DDQ (2.1 eq.), DCM–H2O (3 : 1), rt.
resulting amides.
13 The e.e. of (1R,2S,5S)-4 (88% e.e.) equals the d.e. of (1R,2S,5S,aS)-5
(88% d.e.), indicating that the minor diastereoisomer from kinetic
resolution has the (1S,2R,5R,aS) configuration.
In conclusion, the kinetic resolution of (RS)-1 has been
achieved with lithium amide (S)-2, while the parallel kinetic
resolution of (RS)-1 has been achieved using a pseudoenantio-
meric mixture of lithium amides (S)-2 and (R)-6. High levels of
selectivity are observed in these resolution reactions, which
simultaneously generate the C(1) and C(2) stereogenic centres
of the b-amino ester addition product stereoselectively while
kinetically resolving the C(5)-stereogenic centre. The parallel
kinetic resolution protocol allows for the efficient synthesis of
each enantiomer of (1R,2S,5S)- and (1S,2R,5R)-5-tert-butyl-
cispentacin in a single reaction, and in higher e.e. than that
afforded by standard kinetic resolution. The use of parallel
kinetic resolution in this manner (E > 65 in each case) is
equivalent to a simple kinetic resolution with an apparent E of
up to 1000 (99% e.e. at 50% conversion), and effectively
introduces an automatic barrier for each resolution at the
optimum 50% conversion. The generality of this highly
selective protocol has been demonstrated further for a range of
14 For our initial work on parallel kinetic resolution see S. C. Preston, D.
Phil Thesis, University of Oxford, 1989: for other examples of parallel
kinetic resolution see; E. Vedejs and X. Chen, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1997,
119, 2584; T. M. Pedersen, J. F. Jensen, R. E. Humble, T. Rein, D.
Tanner, K. Bodmann and O. Reiser, Org. Lett., 2000, 2, 535; F.
Bertozzi, P. Crotti, F. Macchia, M. Pineschi and B. L. Feringa, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed., 2001, 40, 930; A. G. Al-Sehemi, R. S. Atkinson and C.
K. Meades, Chem. Commun., 2001, 2684.
15 In this parallel kinetic resolution reaction the e.e. of (S)-N-benzyl-N-a-
methylbenzylamine and (R)-N-3,4-dimethoxybenzyl-N-a-methylben-
zylamine was established as 98% by 1H NMR chiral shift experiments
with (R)-O-acetyl mandelic acid and comparison with an authentic
racemic standard.
16 S. G. Davies and O. Ichihara, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry, 1991, 2, 183.
17 The mutual kinetic resolution of (RS)-1 with (RS)-N-3,4-dimethox-
ybenzyl-N-a-methylbenzylamide gave (1RS,2SR,5SR,aSR)-7 in 99 ±
1% d.e. (E > 99).
18 The relative configuration within b-amino ester (1S,2R,5R,aR)-7 was
determined by 1H NOE difference analysis.
CHEM. COMMUN., 2003, 2410–2411
2411