C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Figure 4. A proposed structure for compound 1 + metal ion.
Figure 3. The responses of compounds 1 (black) and 2 (gray) to metal
solutions (150 µM, x-axis markers). Excitation was at 344 nm, and emission
was at 462 and 378 nm.
the structureless broad band observed at 462 nm can be assigned
to the emission of intramolecular excimer in the self-assembly of
1, where binding of the metal center occurs through the phenolate
hydroxyl group and the nitrogen atom of the heterocycle as
schematically illustrated in Figure 4, in which the molecular
modeling structure was energy-minimized using Chemoffice 7.0
MM2 utilities.
In summary, we have developed a new fluorescent sensor for
AgI with remarkably high selectivity and sensitivity. Moreover, this
molecule makes it possible to detect the AgI cation ratiometrically,
thereby eliminating most or all of the possible variability due to
differences in instrumental efficiency and content of effective dye.
From the changes observed in the fluorescence intensity ratio,
we were able to determine the stoichiometry and association
constant of 1 with metal ions by the following equations:12
1
1
1 - R
[Mn+]m )
‚
‚
(1)
(2)
[L]nT-1
Rn
n ‚ K
R - Rmin ΦλL
2
1 - R
R
) n ‚
‚
ΦλM2 L
Rmax - R
m
n
Acknowledgment. The work was supported by the Faculty
Research Grant of HKBU (FRG/01-02/II-41) and the China
Postdoctoral Science Foundation.
where R is the fluorescence ratio of the ligand at λ1 and λ2, and
min and Rmax are the limiting values of R at zero cation concentra-
R
tion and at saturating cation concentration, respectively. Nonlinear
fitting with R as a function of AgI concentration shows the formation
of a 1:2 metal-ligand complex and gives a corresponding associa-
Supporting Information Available: Synthesis and characteristics
of 1 and 2, sample preparation for fluorescence measurement, effects
of HgII concentration on 1 emission and those of AgI concentration on
2 emission, nonlinear fitting curves for the stoichiometry, and the effects
of coexistence on the AgI measurement (PDF). This material is available
tion constant for AgI of 2.2 × 105 M-2
.
To explore the effects of ethanol on the sensing behavior of 1 to
metal ions, fluorescence responses of 1 to AgI were examined in
ethanol/water with different volume ratios. In the ethanol percent-
ages between 20 and 60, 1 exhibits strong and selective dual
fluorescence responses of monomer and excimer to AgI. As the
ethanol percentage decreases, 1 exhibits one emission band at 450
nm. On the other hand, when the ethanol percentage exceeded 70,
1 exhibited a strong monomer emission; however, there was no
excimer emission formation even at large AgI concentration. At
10% and 80% ethanol/water, the association constants of 1 with
AgI from the titration data were calculated to be 4.2 × 104 and 6.8
× 103 M-2, respectively.
References
(1) For reviews, see: (a) de Silva, A. P.; Nimal Gunaratne, H. Q.;
Gunnlaugsson, T.; Huxley, A. J. M.; McCoy, C. P.; Rademacher, J. T.;
Rice, T. E. Chem. ReV. 1997, 97, 1515-1566. (b) Valeur, B.; Leray, I.
Coord. Chem. ReV. 2000, 205, 3-40. (c) Prodi, L.; Bolletta, F.; Montalti,
M.; Zaccheroni, N. Coord. Chem. ReV. 2000, 205, 59-83.
(2) Topics in Fluorescence Spectroscopy; Lakowicz, J. R., Ed.; Probe Design
and Chemical Sensing; Plenum: New York, 1994; Vol. 4.
(3) For examples, see: (a) Crynkiemicz, G.; Ponenie, M.; Tsien, R. Y. J.
Biol. Chem. 1985, 260, 3440-3448. (b) Godwin, H. A.; Berg, J. M. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 6514-6515. (c) Deo, S.; Godwin, H. A. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 174-175.
(4) (a) Paker, J.; Glass, T. E. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 6505-6512. (b) Tong,
H.; Wang, L. X.; Ting, X. B.; Wang, F. Macromolecules 2002, 35, 7169-
7171.
(5) (a) Lee, A. W. M.; Chan, W. H.; Jiang, L. S.; Poon, K. W. Chem. Commun.
1997, 611-612. (b) Chan, W. H.; Yang, R. H.; Wang, K. M. Anal. Chim.
Acta 2002, 460, 123-132. (c) Zhang, H. K.; Chan, W. H.; Lee, A. W.
M.; Wong, W. Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 395-397.
(6) (a) Nishizawa, S.; Kato; Teramae, N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 9463-
9464. (b) Sahoo, D.; Narayanaswami, V.; Kay, C. M.; Ryan, R. O.
Biochemistry 2000, 39, 6594-6601.
Subsequently, fluorescence decay measurements manifest the
interaction between 1 and AgI. Fluorescence decay curves for 1
and its AgI compound were recorded at 378 and 462 nm. In the
absence of AgI, the decay times of the pyrene monomer and excimer
were 11.6 and 14.4 ns, respectively. Moreover, the excimer
fluorescence showed a rising time of 3.4 ns due to the formation
of intramolecular excimer. By contrast, the excimer fluorescence
from the silver compound showed a longer decay time (16.2 ns)
and no rising time, which is in agreement with the observed binding-
enhancement fluorescence. Therefore, the fluorescence from the
silver compound is ascribed to the intramolecular excimer, which
can be formed rapidly by the association between adjacent pyrene
moieties in the molecule.
To gain insight into the role of the hydroxyl group of 1 in metal
binding, compound 2 was also investigated. The results showed
that upon reaction with AgI, 2 displayed a fluorescence decrease
both at 378 and at 398 nm with a little increase at 462 nm, indicating
there was no formation of pyrene excimer. On the basis of these
results, it is concluded that the fluorescence response of the sensor
results from the formation of 2:1 complex with the metal ion, and
(7) For examples of pyrene fluorescence probes for metal ion detections,
see: (a) Kra¨mer, R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 772-773. (b)
Yamauchi, A.; Hayashita, T.; Nishizawa, S.; Watanabe, M.; Termae, N.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 2319-2320. (c) Yang, J. S.; Lin, C. S.;
Hwang, C. Y. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 889-892.
(8) Bodenant, B.; Fages, F.; Delville, M. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120,
7511-7519.
(9) Wang, J.; Gagne, S.; Sykes, B. D.; Ryan, R. O. J. Biol. Chem. 1997, 272,
17912-17920.
(10) The effects of HgII concentration on 1 fluorescence emission are shown
as Supporting Information.
(11) Ma, J. C.; Dougherty, D. A. Chem. ReV. 1997, 97, 1303-1324.
(12) Equations 1 and 2 were derived by modifying the equation for 1:1
complexation of a fluorophore and CaII, given in the following paper in
detail: Yang, R. H.; Li, K. A.; Wang, K. M.; Zhao, F.; Li, N.; Liu, F.
Anal. Chem. 2003, 75, 612-621.
JA029253D
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 125, NO. 10, 2003 2885