Triplet Energy Transfer in Flexible Molecules
J. Am. Chem. Soc., Vol. 121, No. 41, 1999 9631
or excimer and exciplex formation between39 two functional
groups at opposite ends of a molecular chain. This is not
surprising, since energy transfer occurs over longer distances
than does either covalent bonding or excimer formation. Rate
constants for exothermic bimolecular energy transfer between
the chromophores used in this work are nearly diffusion
controlled.6,27 The efficiency of correspondingly fast intramo-
lecular processes can be controlled by bond rotation rates and/
or by ground-state conformational distribution.11,40 Under such
conditions, ratios of intramolecular/bimolecular rate constants
are not measures of “effective molarity” such as one observes
with slow ground-state reactions under conditions of rapid
conformational equilibrium.38 In particular, the kET values in
Tables 4 and 5 are not simple weighted averages over all
conformations;14 thus, we must carefully dissect the various
conformational contributions to energy transfer.
produce the same overall rate constant. On the other hand, direct
connection of the carbonyl to the linking skeleton in our and
Cowan’s compounds could enhance through-bond coupling
relative to that in Closs’s systems, in which the connection was
para on the benzoyl ring. If there is, indeed, such an enhance-
ment, it does not produce larger kET values in the shortest
flexible bichromophores than those in Closs’s analogous
compounds, a fact that must reflect how the percentage of
gauche conformations increases with x.
In our flexible bichromophores with five-atom links, kET is
lower than that for the corresponding molecules with a four-
atom link by a factor of 2-3 but higher by about a factor of 5
than that in the rigid model. The 90% efficiency of energy
transfer is a combination of very slow hydrogen abstraction (the
inductive effect of δ-alkoxy substitution23) and a still relatively
high kET. Molecular flexibility apparently produces sufficient
conformations in which the two chromophores are close enough
that through-space contributions become competitive with
through-bond interaction. Such coiled conformations must
contain several gauche C-C bond arrangements, which presum-
ably weaken through-bond interaction but allow through-space
interaction.
Triplet excitation of the carbonyl chromophore is unlikely
to significantly alter either the conformational equilibrium or
the rotational kinetics of the bichromophoric molecules from
their ground-state behavior. Each conformation has its own
probability of undergoing energy transfer that depends mainly
on the distance between chromophores and their orientations.
All conformers whose chromophores are 6 Å or less apart should
contribute to the total transfer. Those in which the chromophores
are within 3-4 Å of each other should undergo energy transfer
in 100 ps or less,5-7 as observed for in-cage bimolecular energy
transfer, where chromophores presumably approach van der
Waals separation. Whatever small fraction of our aryloxy
ketones that preexist in such geometries before excitation would
undergo instantaneous energy transfer, since bond rotation would
barely compete. Such ground-state control41 is the intramolecular
equivalent of static quenching.6,11 Likewise, any such geometries
formed by bond rotations competing with γ-hydrogen abstrac-
tion would also undergo efficient energy transfer so rapidly as
to make the bond rotation largely irreversible. Such rotational
control is the intramolecular equivalent of diffusion-controlled
quenching.11,40 Conformers with chain ends 5-6 Å apart, where
For flexible bichromophores with n g 5, the rate constants
remain remarkably high, no longer falling an order of magnitude
per additional bond as they do for molecules with rigid spacers.
In fact, the overall drop on going from n ) 5 to 14 is a factor
of only 0.20-0.25, or 0.86 per bond. (We have too few data
for our flexible benzoyl/styrene system15 to provide a meaningful
comparison with the current results.) The rate constants for our
longest bichromophores are only 1 order of magnitude lower
than those for molecules with four-atom tethers. The rate
constant for TET through a rigid steroid molecule in which a
benzophenone donor is separated by 11 bonds from a naphtha-
lene acceptor was found to be 25 s-1 10
, 7 orders of magnitude
smaller than that for our corresponding flexible molecule Bz-
9-ONp (3.8 × 108 s-1). Given these huge differences between
rigid and flexible spacers, Figures 1 and 2 suggest that >99%
of the total energy transfer occurs through space when n g 5.
From the slow decrease in kET values as n increases, we
conclude that, for molecules with six or more connecting bonds
between chromophores, conformational factors produce a nearly
constant percentage of coiled geometries in which the two
chromophores are close enough for through-space energy
transfer to compete with triplet decay, in this case γ-hydrogen
abstraction. Similar plateaus have been observed in various
studies on electron transfer,43 spin-orbit exchange interaction
in biradicals,44 and many cyclization reactions.11,38 Various
Monte Carlo calculations45 as well as exact enumeration
calculations of Sisido and Shimada46 predict that, even for very
long molecules with 10-25-atom chains, there exists a certain
small fraction of conformations in which the two ends are close
enough to interact. What we can conclude is that this small
fraction could not produce the observed high energy transfer
efficiencies and rate constants.
kET ) 108-109 s-1 42
should also contribute directly to the
,
observed value of kET, but now with efficiencies determined
largely by conformational equilibria. Thus, all three kinetics
boundary conditions for intramolecular reactions are likely to
coexist in our bichromophores, with individual kET values
comprising different combinations of the three.
We include the data for benzoyl-to-styrene TET in Figure 1
to illustrate that, for very short, flexible tethers (3-4 bonds),
rate constants are nearly the same as those in Closs’s rigid
systems, dropping 1 order of magnitude with each additional
connecting bond. Likewise, kET for Bz-3-ONp is nearly identical
in value to that for Closs’s rigid benzophenone-naphthalene
system with five connecting bonds. We might conclude that
through-bond interactions predominate in all four-atom (and
shorter) tethered molecules, were it not for the strong likelihood
of significant population of conformers with gauche attachment
of the terminal chromophores in the flexible systems. These
presumably would have weaker through-bond interactions,9 in
which case there must be enough through-space interaction to
(43) (a) Shimada, K.; Shimozato, Y.; Szwarc, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1975, 97, 5834 and references therein. (b) Yonemoto, E. H.; Saupe, G. B.;
Schmehl, R. H.; Hubig, S. H.; Riley, R. L.; Iverson, B. L.; Mallouk, T. E.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 4786. (c) Park, J. W.; Lee, B. A.; Lee, S. Y.
J. Phys. Chem. B 1998, 102, 8209. (d) Staerk, H.; Busmann, H. G.; Ku¨hnte,
W.; Treichel, R. J. Phys. Chem. 1991, 95, 1907.
(39) (a) Zachariasse, K.; Ku¨hnle, W. Z. Phys. Chem., N. F. 1976, 101,
267. (b) Halpern, A. A.; Legenze, M. W.; Ramachandran, J. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1979, 101, 5736.
(40) Wagner, P. J. Acc. Chem. Res. 1983, 16, 461.
(44) Forbes, M. D. E.; Closs, G. L.; Calle, P.; Gautam, P. J. Phys. Chem.
1993, 97, 3384. Forbes, M. D. E.; Schulz, G. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994,
116, 10174.
(45) Closs, G. L.; Forbes, M. D. E.; Piotrowiak, P. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1992, 114, 3285. Avdievich, N. I.; Forbes, M. D. E. J. Phys. Chem. 1995,
99, 9660. Werner, U.; Staerk, H. J. Phys. Chem. 1993, 97, 9274.
(46) Sisido, M.; Shimada, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1977, 99, 7785.
(41) Baldwin, J. E.; Kroeger, N. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1969, 91, 6444.
Dauben, W. G.; Williams, R. G.; McKelvey, R. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1973,
95, 3932. Lewis, F. D.; Johnson, R. W.; Kory, D. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1974, 96, 6090.
(42) Terenin, A.; Ermolaev, V. Trans. Faraday Soc. 1956, 52, 1042.
Ermolaev, V. L. SoV. Phys., Dokl. 1967, 6, 600.