1
νCO/cmϪ1: 1675(vs), 1603(vs), νasCS: 832(m). H NMR: δ 2.88 (s, 3H,
SCH3), 2.96, 3.52 (s, 6H, 2NCH3), 7.30–7.57 (m, 15H, Ph). 31P{1H}
NMR: δ 28.0 (PPh3). 13C{1H} NMR: δ 21.2 (s, SCH3), 43.6, 52.0 (s,
NCH3), 128.2–134.2 (m, C of Ph), 199.0 (s, S2CO), 247.9 (d, NCSMe,
JP–C = 14.6). MS (FAB, NBA, m/z): 564 (Mϩ). Anal. Calcd. for
C23H24NOPS3Pd: C, 48.98; H, 4.30; N, 2.48%. Found: C, 49.85; H, 4.56;
N, 2.38. 4: IR (KBr) νCO/cmϪ1: 1681(vs), 1605(vs), νasCS: 832(m).
1H NMR: δ 1.20 (t, 3H, SCH2CH3, JH–H = 7.5), 2.89, 3.54 (s, 6H,
2NCH3), 3.45, 4.03 (m, 2H, SCH2), 7.40–7.57 (m, 15H, Ph). 31P{1H}
NMR: δ 28.0 (PPh3). 13C{1H} NMR: δ 13.4 (s, SCH2CH3), 33.4, (s,
SCH2), 43.6, 52.2 (s, NCH3), 128.4–134.0 (m, C of Ph), 199.1 (s, S2CO),
246.7 (d, NCSEt, JP–C = 15.2). MS (FAB, NBA, m/z): 578 (Mϩ). Anal.
Calcd. for C24H26NOPS3Pd: C, 49.87; H, 4.53; N, 2.42%. Found: C,
50.15; H, 4.38; N, 2.28.
Crystal data for (2)2ؒCH3CN: C6H9K2NO2S4, M = 333.58, mono-
clinic, space group P21/n, a = 9.91767(7) Å, b = 10.3027(8) Å, c =
14.3530(11) Å, β = 99.660(2)Њ, V = 1445.77(19) Å3, Z = 4, Dcalcd = 1.533 g
cmϪ3, µ = 1.214 mmϪl, independent reflections 3318, θrange = 2.32–27.50Њ.
Total number of parameters: 136. R = 0.028, Rw = 0.067; GOF = 1.038,
Mo Kα radiation; λ = 0.71073 Å; T = 150(1) K; ∆F = 0.474, Ϫ0.190 e
Å3. Crystal data for 3: C23H24NOPPdS3, M = 563.98, monoclinic, space
group P21/c, a = 16.3638(2) Å, b = 9.3374(1) Å, c = 15.7117(2) Å, β =
98.2957(6)Њ, V = 2375.56(5) Å3, Z = 4, Dcalcd = 1.577 g cmϪ3, µ = 1.128
mmϪl, independent reflections 5458, θrange = 1.26–27.50Њ. Total number
of parameters: 272. R = 0.039, Rw = 0.090; GOF = 1.119, Mo Kα
radiation; λ = 0.71073 Å; T = 150(1) K; ∆F = 0.813, Ϫ0.728 e Å3.
Absorption corrections of 2 and 3 have been carried out. The two
structures were solved by Patterson synthesis and then refined via
standard least-squares and difference Fourier techniques. Non-
hydrogen atoms were refined by using anisotropic thermal parameters.
suppdata/dt/b3/b305374a/ for crystallographic data in CIF or other
electronic format.
Fig. 1 ORTEP drawing with 50% thermal ellipsoids and atom-
numbering scheme for the complex [Pd(PPh3){η2(S,S)-S2CO}{C(SMe)-
(NMe2)}] 3. Selected bond distances (Å) and angles (Њ) are as follows:
Pd–C(2) 2.043(4), Pd–S(1) 2.3306(9), Pd–S(2) 2.3250(9), Pd–P(1)
2.2889(9), C(1)–O(1) 1.207(4), C(2)–S(3) 1.731(4), C(3)–S(3) 1.808(5),
C(2)–N(1) 1.308(5); S(2)–Pd–P(1) 171.56(3), S(1)–Pd–C(2) 170.61(10),
S(2)–C(1)–S(1) 108.0(2), N(1)–C(2)–Pd 126.7(3), C(5)–N(1)–C(4)
113.2(3).
5: IR (KBr) νCS/cmϪ1: 1436(m). 1H NMR: δ 1.40 (t, 3H, OCH2CH3,
3JH–H = 7.0), 2.95, 3.30 (s, 6H, NCH3), 4.55 (m, 2H, OCH2CH3), 7.37–
7.62 (m, 15H, Ph). 31P{1H} NMR: δ 24.8 (br, PPh3). 13C{1H} NMR:
δ 13.8 (s, OCH2CH3), 38.9, 40.8 (s, NCH3), 67.8, 68.0 (s, OCH2CH3),
128.3–134.2 (m, Ph), 210.0 (s, OCS2), 233.2 (s, NCS). MS (FAB, NBA,
distance is longer than the Pd–S(2) bond distance due to the
high trans influence of carbene ligand than PPh3 ligand. The
bond distances within the dithiocarbonate ligand, S–C(av),
1.773(4) Å, and C(1)–O(1), 1.207(4) Å, fall in the range
of values found for other dithiocarbonate complexes, and are
indicative of an overall electronic delocalization within the
S2CO group.2 The formation of an N, S-heteroatom carbene-
complex from the intramolecular alkyl-thiocarbamoyl coupling
is the first example in the literature.
1
m/z): 578 (Mϩ). 6: IR (KBr) νCO/cmϪ1: 1683(vs), 1610(vs). H NMR:
δ 2.82 (s, 3H, SCH3), 2.93, 3.49 (s, 6H, 2NCH3), 7.28–7.76 (m, 15H, Ph).
31P{1H} NMR: δ 15.4 (t, PPh3, JPt–P = 1662.3). 13C{1H} NMR: δ 21.8 (t,
SCH3, JPt–C = 34.5), 43.2, 51.2 (t, NCH3, JPt–C = 17.5, 30.8), 128.1–137.2
(m, C of Ph), 195.5 (s, S2CO), 229.8 (d, NCSMe, JP–C = 9.5). MS (FAB,
NBA, m/z): 653 (Mϩ). Anal. Calcd. for C23H24NOPS3Pt: C, 42.32; H,
3.71; N, 2.15%. Found: C, 42.48; H, 3.80; N, 2.01. 7: IR (KBr) νCO/
cmϪ1: 1680(vs), 1612(vs). 1H NMR: δ 1.43 (t, 3H, SCH2CH3, JH–H
=
7.1), 2.94, 3.21 (s, 6H, 2NCH3), 4.55 (q, 2H, SCH2, JH–H = 7.1), 7.37–
7.86 (m, 15H, Ph). 31P{1H} NMR: δ 28.0 (t, PPh3, JPt–P = 1616). 13C{1H}
NMR: δ 13.7 (t, SCH2CH3, JPt–C = 47.1), 39.8 (t, SCH2, JPt–C = 17.4),
43.8, 51.8 (t, NCH3, JPt–C = 17.4, 32.4), 128.2–134.4 (m, C of Ph), 194.4
(s, S2CO), 226.5 (d, NCSEt, JP–C = 9.2). MS (FAB, NBA, m/z): 667
(Mϩ). Anal. Calcd. for C24H26NOPS3Pt: C, 43.23; H, 3.93; N, 2.10%.
Found: C, 43.35; H, 4.08; N, 2.02.
In an attempt to get information about the alkyl migration,
complex [Pd(η1-CSNMe2)(PPh3)2(Cl)]7 was used to react with
EtOCS2K in MeOH at room temperature for 5 min to form
complexes [Pd(PPh3){η2(S,S)-S2COEt]{η1-CS(NMe2)}] 5‡
and 4 with a 10 : 1 ratio from the integration of 31P{1H} NMR
spectrum. In the solution state, complex [Pd(PPh3){η2(S,S)-
S2COEt]{η1-CS(NMe2)}] 5 ethyl migration slowly gives 4
during 2 h. To test the generality of these reactions, we have
studied the platinum system. Interestingly, the reactions of
[Pt(η2-SCNMe2)(PPh3)2][PF6] with KS2COR (R = Me, Et) in
MeOH at room temperature for 2 h also gave dithiocarbonate
carbene-complexes[Pt(PPh3){η2(S,S)-S2COR]{C(SR)(NMe2)}]
(R = Me, 6; Et, 7).‡ It is clear that in the reactions of
thiocarbamoyl Pd and Pt complexes with KS2COR (R = Me,
Et) ligands, the intramolecular alkyl-thiocarbamoyl coupling
reaction occurs. Olefin metathesis reactions of 3 and 4 are
currently under investigation.
1 M. Schmittel, D. Rodriguez and J. P. Steffen, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.,
2000, 39, 2152 and references therein. K. Aparna, R. McDonald and
R. G. Cavell, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2000, 122, 9314 and references
therein. L. D. Field, W. J. Shaw and P. Turner, Organometallics, 2001,
20, 3491 and references therein.
2 T. R. Gaffney and J. A. Ibers, Inorg. Chem., 1982, 21, 2860;
H. Werner, W. Bertleff, B. Zimmer-Gasser and U. Schubert, Chem.
Ber., 1982, 115, 1004; T. R. Gaffney and J. A. Ibers, Inorg. Chem.,
1982, 21, 2851; C. Bianchini, A. Meli and A. Orlandini, Inorg.
Chem., 1982, 21, 4166.
3 F. Cecconi, C. A. Ghilardi, S. Midollini, S. Moneti, A. Orlandini and
G. Scapacci, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans., 1989, 211; C. Bianchini,
C. A. Ghilardi, A. Meli and A. Orlandini, J. Organomet. Chem.,
1985, 286, 259; C. Bianchini and A. Meli, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton
Trans., 1983, 2419; C. Bianchini and A. Meli, Inorg. Chem., 1987, 26,
4268; C. Bianchini, C. Mealli, A. Meli and M. Sabat, J. Chem. Soc.,
Chem. Commun., 1985, 1024.
4 R. Colton, J. C. Traeger and V. Tedesco, Inorg. Chim. Acta, 1993,
210, 193; R. Colton and V. Tedesco, Inorg. Chim. Acta, 1992, 202,
95; R. Colton and V. Tedesco, Inorg. Chim. Acta, 1991, 183, 161.
5 J. Doherty, J. Fortune, A. R. Manning and F. S. Stephens, J. Chem.
Soc., Dalton Trans., 1984, 1111.
Acknowledgements
We thank the National Science Council of Taiwan, the
Republic of China (project: NSC92-2113-241-001) for financial
support and Mrs S.-L. Huang for carrying out NMR
experiments.
6 R. Rossi, A. Marchi, L. Margon, U. Casellato and R. Graziani,
J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans., 1990, 2923.
7 K. H. Yih, G. H. Lee and Y. Wang, Inorg. Chem. Commun., 2003, 6,
577; K. H. Yih, G. H. Lee and Y. Wang, Inorg. Chem. Commun.,
2003, 6, 213; K. H. Yih, G. H. Lee and Y. Wang, Inorg. Chem., 2003,
Notes and references
1
‡ Selected spectroscopic data: H (500 MHz) and 13C{1H} (125 MHz)
NMR (CDCl3, relative to SiMe4, multiplicity, assignment, J in Hz)
31P{1H} (202 MHz) NMR (H3PO4 external standard). 3: IR (KBr)
D a l t o n T r a n s . , 2 0 0 3 , 2 8 1 0 – 2 8 1 2
2811