1 in low yield. Compound 1 is a fully functionalized
precursor for an intramolecular Castro-Stephens reaction.7
Reaction of 1 under Castro-Stephens conditions yielded
macrocycle 3 that arises from the desired intramolecular sp-
sp2 coupling. Generally, this reaction is stereospecific with
respect to the precursor vinyliodide,13 and in the present case
a trans C8-C9 double bond was expected. However, NMR
Scheme 5
3
analysis yielded a coupling constant of J ) 12 Hz for the
double bond, a difference of 4 Hz by comparison with the
results from Coleman and Garg,7 who reported a value of 3J
) 16 Hz for trans-configured C8-C9 centers in several
model systems.
To put these values in perspective, we calculated Z and E
vicinal 3J(H,H) values across C8-C9 for the global minimum
energy conformations (see below) of model systems 21 and
22 (Scheme 7). The coupling constants were obtained by
computing the four contributing terms according to Ramsey’s
non-relativistic approach14 in the context of the B3LYP/6-
311G(d,p) method.15
elongation, and subsequent deprotection of the alkyne under
mild nucleophilic conditions gave the desired aliphatic
building block 19.
With the two building blocks 13 and 19 in hand, our next
aim was the formation of the macrocyclic core structure of
oximidine II. Our strategy was the saponification of 13,
esterification of resulting 20 with 19, and a macrocyclization
under Castro-Stephens conditions.7 Ester hydrolysis of 13
was achieved with TFA/CH2Cl2 to give acid 20 in 77% yield
(Scheme 6). The subsequent esterification with 19 was
difficult because of the low reactivity of the acid moiety due
to steric and electronic reasons. However, following the
Yamaguchi procedure we were able to form the desired ester
Scheme 7
Scheme 6
3
Summing the Ramsey contributions furnishes J(H,H)
values of 14.2 and 20.4 Hz, respectively (Table 1). Since
3
the predicted J(H,H) values are slightly overestimated by
comparison to the experimental values, we scaled the
3
predictions by employing the Z and E J values of acrylo-
nitrile as standards (∆3J ) -2.4 and -4.5 Hz, respectively;
Table 1). In this way, the values for 21 and 22 are reduced
to 11.8 and 15.9 Hz, respectively, in complete accord with
the experimental values of 12 and 16 Hz. To test whether
the aromatic methoxy substituent in 3 might lower the E-3J
from 16 to 12 Hz, truncated forms of 22 and 3 (27 and 28,
respectively; see Supporting Information) were subjected to
coupling constant analysis (Table 1). The methoxy perturba-
3
tion has no influence on the vicinal J value.
We conclude that compound 3 is the Z,Z isomer. A strong
NOE between the protons at C8 and C9 supports this
deduction. Presumably, isomerization took place from the
(13) (a) Kabbara, J.; Hoffmann, C.; Schinzer, D. Synthesis 1995, 299-
302. (b) von der Ohe, F.; Bruckner, R. New J. Chem. 2000, 24, 659-669.
(c) Rawat, D. S.; Zaleski, J. M. Synth. Commun. 2002, 32, 1489-1494.
(14) Ramsey, N. F. Phys. ReV. 1953, 91, 303-307.
(15) For definitions of the various terms and the method of calculation,
see: Barone V.; Peralta, J. E.; Contreras, R. H.; Snyder, J. P. J. Phys. Chem.
A 2002, 106, 5607-5612.
Org. Lett., Vol. 5, No. 26, 2003
5021