COMMUNICATION
Table 1. Examination of the Efficiency of Ligands 5, 9, and PiPr2Ph
To Facilitate Suzuki Cross-Coupling between Phenylboronic Acid and
p-Chlorotoluene, p-Chloroacetophenone, or 1,4-Dichlorobenzene
chlorides since such substrates typically require electron-
rich phosphine promoters.13 Under conditions recently re-
ported by Fu,14 we found that [nBu4N][Ph3BPm-iPr ] (5) pro-
2
moted the cross-coupling of the three substrates shown in
Table 1 in modestly good yield. For comparison, the iso-
structural but neutral ligand 9, as well as the more conven-
tional phosphine PiPr2Ph, were screened and also found to
give the cross-coupled products, albeit in yields that were
reproducibly ∼20% lower than the yields obtained using 5.15
The appreciable difference in yields likely reflects the greater
electron-releasing character of 5. Assuming oxidative addi-
tion of the aryl chloride to be rate-limiting, an anionic
[LPd0]- fragment would be expected to undergo oxidative
addition more rapidly than a neutral LPd0 fragment.
yielda (%)
R
L ) 5
L ) 9
L ) iPr2PPh
Me
71%
68%
74%
56%
43%
38%
49%
43%
49%
Cl
COMe
a
Isolated yields reported as the average of two independent runs.
Infrared model studies of ligands 5 and 9 are consistent
with this latter suggestion. For example, refluxing a solu-
tion of either 5 or 9 in a THF solution of Mo(CO)6 led, re-
spectively, to the anionic pentacarbonyl complex {nBu4N}-
shifted further downfield in their 31P NMR spectra (38.11
1
1
ppm, JPt-P ) 1900 Hz and 36.53 ppm, JPt-P ) 1917 Hz,
respectively). An XRD study of crystals of 12 confirmed its
cis coordination (Figure 2, also see Supporting Information).
The dianionic species 12-15 are highly reactive toward
both Bronsted and Lewis acids in THF and acetonitrile
solution. For example, stoichiometric addition of B(C6F5)3
effected the rapid release of 1 equiv of [NR4][Me(B(C6F5)3)]
(1H, 19F NMR) to produce the corresponding trans, mono-
anionic solvento species {NR4}{trans-[Ph3BP′]2Pt(Me)(solv)}.
trans-Disposition of the phosphine ligands was inferred from
{[Ph3BPm-iPr ]Mo(CO)5} (19) and the neutral pentacarbonyl
2
31
(Ph3SiPm-iPr )Mo(CO)5 (20), as confirmed by IR and P NMR
2
spectroscopy, as well as ES/MS. Infrared carbonyl vibrations
for 19 were recorded at 2065 and 1925 cm-1, whereas those
for 20 were recorded at 2070 and 1942 cm-1.16,17 Both the
high and low energy vibrations thus shift to lower energy in
the anionic system 19, likely reflecting an appreciable in-
crease in electron-releasing character of anionic 5 versus
neutral 9.
Future work will examine the utility of these anionic phos-
phines in generating zwitterionic precursors for catalytic
studies.
1
the dramatic increase in the JPt-P coupling constants and
the single resonance observed in the 31P NMR spectra. The
isostructural but neutral dimethyl complexes (Ph3SiPp-iPr )2-
2
PtMe2 (16) and (Ph3SiPp-Ph )2PtMe2 (17) displayed quite
2
distinct reactivity. For example, in the case of 16, methide
Acknowledgment. The NSF (CHE-01232216) and BP
have provided financial support for this work. Larry Henling
and J. Christopher Thomas provided assistance with the
crystallographic studies.
abstraction by B(C6F5)3 required ca. 12 h and led to the
cis-mono(solvento) species [cis-(Ph3SiPp-Ph )2PtMe(solv)]-
2
[Me(B(C6F5)3] (18) exclusively as the kinetic product at RT.
Slow isomerization of 18 to its thermodynamic trans isomer
occurred over a period of days in solution. Given the steric
similarity between ligands 6 and 10, the apparently substan-
tial rate difference displayed with respect to cis f trans
isomerization in these mono-solvento adducts is striking and
most likely electronic in origin. One plausible explanation
is to suggest that the anionic ligand 6 exerts a greater trans-
influence and thus labilizes solvent molecules in the trans
position of the kinetic cis-phosphine product to a larger extent
than for the neutral ligand 10, thereby facilitating rapid
isomerization.
As a final point of interest, we have briefly examined the
ability of 3-6 to promote Suzuki cross-coupling reactions.
Each ligand proved generally effective for the coupling of
PhB(OH)2 with typical aryliodide and arylbromide substrates
(see Supporting Information). More interesting was the ability
of these ligands to facilitate the cross-coupling of aryl
Supporting Information Available: Experimental procedures
(PDF), characterization data, additional Suzuki coupling data, and
crystallographic information (CIF). This material is available free
IC0350234
(13) (a) Miyaura, N.; Suzuki, A. Chem. ReV. 1995, 95, 2457. (b) Suzuki,
A. J. Organomet. Chem. 1999, 576, 147.
(14) (a) Littke, A. F.; Fu, G. C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 3387.
(b) Littke, A. F.; Dai, C.; Fu, G. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122,
4020.
(15) The phenyl substituted ligands 1, 3, and 4 were much less effective
in the Suzuki coupling of aryl chlorides. Ligand 6 showed comparable
activity to 5 in several model studies. Also, a point of concern pertains
to whether the tetraarylborate unit of ligand 5 is transferred during
the cross-coupling reactions. While we cannot rule-out this possibility
altogether, we note that tolylboronic acids were also screened briefly
and found to give comparable yields.
(16) Although three IR active vibrations are predicted, only the A12 and E
1
stretches are resolved. The A1 stretch is weak and presumably
coincident with the E vibration.
(12) (a) Konze, W. V.; Scott, B. L.; Kubas, G. J. Chem. Commun. 1999,
1807. (b) Alibrandi, G.; Minniti, D.; Scolaro, M.; Romeo, R. Inorg.
Chem. 1988, 27, 318. (c) Alibrandi, G.; Romeo, R. Inorg. Chem. 1997,
36, 4822.
(17) (a) Cotton, F. A.; Darensbourg, D. J.; Ilsley, W. H. Inorg. Chem. 1981,
20, 578. (b) Cotton, F. A.; Kraihanzel, C. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1962,
84, 4432. (c) Magee, T. A.; Matthews, C. N.; Wang, T. S.; Wotiz, J.
H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1961, 83, 3200.
10 Inorganic Chemistry, Vol. 43, No. 1, 2004