C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
and thus palladium is kept in +2 oxidation state throughout the
entire transformation. Accordingly, there are two crucial differences
between the presented catalytic substitution reaction (eq 1) and the
palladium(0)-catalyzed addition reaction:1,2 (i) in the pincer complex-
catalyzed processes, only a single trimethyltin group is coordinated
to palladium (1c), which substitutes the propargylic chloride group,
and (ii) application of pincer catalyst 1a involves that a palladium(0)
species does not form in the catalytic cycle, and therefore an initial
oxidative addition to the propargylic chloride9 (mesylate, acetate,
etc.) functionality can be avoided. These features allow a highly
selective novel transformation of functionalized propargyl chlorides.
Figure 1. Formation of 6c in the reaction of 4d and 3 catalyzed by pincer
complexes 1a (b) and 2 (9).
substitution process; however, it shows a remarkably lower activity
than the parent complex 1a (cf. entries 1 and 2). The retarding
effect of the nitro group was also clearly observed by monitoring
the formation of 6c in the reaction of 4d and 3 with catalytic
amounts of 1a or 2 (Figure 1). Replacement of the σ-donor amino
groups in 1a with π-acceptor phosphines (7) leads to a complete
loss of catalytic activity (entry 3). Commonly used catalysts such
as Pd(PPh3)4 and Li2[PdCl4] do not show any catalytic activity under
the applied reaction conditions.
In summary, we have devised a new pincer complex-catalyzed
trimethyl-stannane substitution reaction of propargyl chlorides with
hexamethylditin. The catalytic reaction proceeds under mild condi-
tions tolerating many functional groups such as OH, OAc, COOEt,
NR3, and NR2Ac. The outcome of the reaction can be controlled
by the choice of the functionalities. Reaction of propargylic
substrates with electron-donating groups gives propargyl stannanes,
while substitution of propargyl chlorides with electron-withdrawing
substituents gives allenyl stannanes. Due to the high level of
functional group tolerance and the operational simplicity, this
method provides an easy access to propargyl and allenyl stannanes,
which are useful building blocks in coupling reactions and in natural
product synthesis.10
The mechanism of the catalytic substitution reaction of 4 with
hexamethylditin (3) (eq 1) is obviously different from the addition
reaction catalyzed by palladium(0) catalysts.1,2 To study the
mechanistic details of the transformation we carried out stoichio-
metric reactions with the catalytically active pincer complex and
the substrates. In these studies we employed acetate complex 1b,
in which the counterion dissociates more easily than in 1a. It was
found that complex 1b and propargylic derivative 4a or 4d do not
react at all in THF-d8 at room temperature (eq 2). However, the
NMR spectrum of pincer complex 1b gradually changed in the
presence of hexamethylditin (3). This process was monitored by
NMR spectroscopy at 25 °C using THF-d8 as a solvent.6 In the 1H
NMR spectrum of the reaction, two new peaks appeared at a high
field: a sharp singlet at 0.05 ppm and a broad singlet at 0.5 ppm.
The peak at 0.5 ppm was identified as the 1H methyl resonance of
Me3Sn-OAc. The peaks of the ligand protons have also shifted
somewhat, still reflecting a Cs symmetry, which is characteristic
for the studied pincer complexes. The 119Sn-NMR spectrum of
the reaction was also monitored in regular time intervals. The sharp
singlet of hexamethylditin (3) resonating at -109.0 ppm was slowly
decreased, while about 15 min after starting the reaction, a new
sharp singlet appeared at -0.2 ppm. This new peak did not arise
from Me3Sn-OAc, since it gives a broad singlet 119Sn-resonance
Acknowledgment. This work was supported by the Swedish
Research Council (VR).
Supporting Information Available: Experimental procedures as
well as characterization and NMR spectra of the products. This material
References
(1) Beletskaya, I.; Moberg, C. Chem. ReV. 1999, 99, 3435.
(2) (a) Mitchell, T. N.; Killing, A. A. H.; Rutschow, D. J. Organomet. Chem.
1986, 304, 257. (b) Piers, E.; Skrelj, R. T. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun.
1986, 626. (c) Mabon, R.; Richecoeur, A. M. E.; Sweeney, J. B. J. Org.
Chem. 1999, 64, 328. (d) Tsuji, Y.; Nishiyama, K.; Hori, S.-i.; Ebihara,
M.; Kawamura, T. Organometallics 1998, 17, 507. (e) Hua, R.; Onozawa,
S.-y.; Tanaka, M. Organometallics 2000, 19, 3269. (f) Manusco, J.;
Lautens, M. Org. Lett. 2003, 1653.
(3) Solin, N.; Kjellgren, J.; Szabo´, K. J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42,
3656.
(4) (a) Albrect, M.; van Koten, G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 3751.
(b) Singleton, J. T. Tetrahedron 2003, 59, 1837.
1
at 125.8 ppm.7 Thus, we interpret the above H and 119Sn NMR
results as formation of a new trimethyl-stannyl species 1c. The
observed 119Sn NMR resonance of -0.2 ppm is in the range of the
NMR values reported for other pallada-stannane complexes:
Pd(PMe3)2(SnMe3)2 resonates at -28.0 ppm,2d while Pd(dppe)-
(CONiPr)(SnMe3) resonates at 45.4 ppm.2e
(5) (a) Alsters, P. L.; Baesjou, P. J.; Janssen, M. D.; Kooijman, H.; Sicherer-
Roetman, A.; Spek, A. L.; van Koten, G. Organometallics 1992, 11, 4124.
(b) Rimml, H.; Venanzi, L. M. J. Organomet. Chem. 1983, 259, C6.
(6) 1H and 119Sn NMR experiments were performed using 1b and 6.0 equiv
of 3 in THF-d8 at 25 °C.
(7) Due to line broadening, this 119Sn NMR resonance can only be observed
using a high concentration of Me3Sn-OAc. Literature value for 119Sn
shift of Me3Sn-OAc (in CDCl3): 129.0 ppm. Wrackmeyer, B. Annual
Reports on NMR Spectroscopy; Academic Press: London, 1985; Vol 16,
p 73.
no reaction 74a or 4d 1b
9
38 1c
(2)
Considering the above results, the catalytic cycle (eq 3) is
initiated by formation of (mono)stannane complex 1c followed by
the transfer of the trimethyltin functionality to the propargylic
substrate and regeneration of the catalyst. In the case of alkyl and
phenyl substituents, an SN2-type of displacement of the leaving
group (chloride or mesylate) takes place (eq 3). Alternatively, in
the presence of electron-withdrawing substituents, addition of 1c
to the triple bond of the propargylic substrate followed by â-chloride
elimination provides the allenyl stannane product.8 A remarkable
feature of this catalytic cycle is that redox processes do not occur,
(8) Formation of the allenic product 6 in the presence of electron-withdrawing
substituents can be ascribed to the polarization of the π-system of the
triple bond. As a consequence, the carbon atom attached to the electron-
withdrawing substituent is activated toward nucleophilic attack by the
trimethyltin ligand of 1c.
(9) (a) Tsuji, J.; Mandai, T. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1995, 34, 2589. (b)
Elsevier, C. J.; Kleijn, H.; Boersma, J.; Vermeer, P. Organometallics 1986,
5, 716.
(10) (a) Marshall, J. A. Chem. ReV. 1996, 96, 31. (b) Marshall, J. A.; Wang,
X.-j. J. Org. Chem. 1992, 57, 1242. (c) Ruitenberg, K.; Westmijze, H.;
Meijer, C. J.; Elsevier, C. J.; Vermeer, P. J. J. Organomet. Chem. 1983,
241, 417.
JA0391715
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 126, NO. 2, 2004 475