Chemistry Letters 2000
963
In order to clarify the role of the trimethylsilyl group, the
cyclization reaction of desilylated substrate 7, prepared in the
same way, was also examined. However, as expected, com-
pound 7 did not afford any cyclization product after treatment
under the same reaction conditions (Scheme 3). This indicates
that the cyclization of 3 proceeds through silicon-stabilized car-
bocation 10 (Scheme 4).5 It is interesting that the product was
not the expected alcohol 11 but enone 6. The reaction mecha-
nism is not clear as yet, however isomerization from 11 to 6 is a
plausible pathway. The double-bond isomerization from (Z)-3
to (E)-3 should occur prior to the cyclization, as observed previ-
ously,9 since the cyclization must be proceeded from (E)-3.
Another interesting aspect of the present cyclization is the
reaction mode, which is illustrated in Figure 2. We previously
References and Notes
1
2
3
S. E. Denmark, in “Comprehensive Organic Synthesis,” ed.
by B. M. Trost, Pergamon Press, Oxford (1991), Vol. 5, p.
751.
a) C. Kuroda and Y. Hirono, Tetrahedron Lett., 35, 6895
(1994). b) C. Kuroda, H. Sumiya, A. Murase, and A.
Koito, Chem. Commun., 1997, 1177.
For allylsilane promoted Nazarov cyclization: a) S. E.
Denmark and R. C. Klix, Tetrahedron, 44, 4043 (1988). b)
S. E. Denmark, M. A. Wallace, and C. B. Walker, Jr., J.
Org. Chem., 55, 5543 (1990). c) K.-T. Kang, S. S. Kim, J.
C. Lee, and J. S. U, Tetrahedron Lett., 33, 3495 (1992).
For related reaction of allylsilanes from our laboratory: C.
Kuroda, Recent Res. Dev. Pure Appl. Chem., 2, 189 (1998).
For review on the reaction of allylsilanes: a) A. Hosomi,
Acc. Chem. Res., 21, 200 (1988). b) Y. Yamamoto and N.
Asao, Chem. Rev., 93, 2207 (1993). c) E. Langkopf and D.
Schinzer, Chem. Rev., 95, 1375 (1995). d) I. Fleming, A.
Barbero, and D. Walter, Chem. Rev., 97, 2063 (1997).
For recent examples on the synthesis of spiro[4.5]decanes:
a) T. Sattelkau and P. Eilbracht, Tetrahedron Lett., 39,
1905 (1998). b) G. A. Molander and C. Alonso-Alija,
Tetrahedron, 53, 8067 (1997). c) Y. Takemoto, T. Ohra,
Y. Yonetoku, and C. Iwata, Chem. Pharm. Bull., 45, 459
(1997). d) P. J. Biju and G. S. R. S. Rao, Tetrahedron
Lett., 40, 2405 (1999). e) S. Kotha, E. Manivannan, T.
Ganesh, N. Sreenivasachary, and A. Deb, Synlett, 1999,
1618. f) M. Pohmakotr, T. Bunlaksananusorn, and P.
Tuchinda, Tetrahedron Lett., 41, 377 (2000).
4
5
6
7
8
9
T. K. Devon and A. I. Scott, “Handbook of Naturally
Occurring Compounds, Vol. II,” Academic Press, New
York (1972).
For recent reports on natural sesquiterpenes: B. M. Fraga,
Nat. Prod. Rep., 16, 711 (1999); 15, 73 (1998); 14, 145
(1997).
reported9 that 2-(trimethylsilylmethyl)pentadienoic acid or its
ester reacts with proton to afford lactone, where the reaction
proceeded through mode A (E = R3 = H, R4 = OH or OEt) but
not mode B. In contrast, the present reaction apparently pro-
ceeded via mode B (E = FeCl3, R1 = R4 = H).
C. Kuroda, N. Mitsumata, and C. Y. Tang, Bull. Chem.
Soc. Jpn., 69, 1409 (1996).
10 Anhydrous FeCl3 was used without careful handling.
11 FeCl3 was added to a solution of 3 at –60 °C, and the reac-
tion mixture was slowly warmed to room temperature; See
Ref. 2a.
1
12 6a: IR (neat) 1702 and 1640 cm–1; H NMR (CDCl3) δ
1.20–1.40 (6H, m) 1.52–1.77 (4H, m), 1.77 (3H, dt, J =
1.3, 2.3 Hz), 2.42 (2H, quint, J = 2.3 Hz), and 7.23 (1H, tq,
J = 2.3, 1.3 Hz).
1
13 6b: IR (neat) 1706 and 1637 cm–1; H NMR (CDCl3) δ
0.85 (9H, s), 1.00–1.11 (3H, m), 1.24–1.35 (2H, m),
1.53–1.66 (2H, m), 1.73–1.80 (2H, m), 1.77 (3H, dt, J =
1.4, 2.2 Hz), 2.39 (2H, quint, J = 2.2 Hz), and 7.23 (1H, tq,
J = 2.2, 1.4 Hz).
In conclusion, a new self-cyclization reaction of linearly
conjugated pentadienal assisted by allylic trimethylsilyl group
was established. Since the carbonyl position in the product is
different from that of the Nazarov cyclization, it is possible to
obtain both spiro[4.5]decan-1-one (6) and -2-one (1) derivatives
from cyclohexanone by two different types of spiroannulation
reaction, the present dienal cyclization and the Nazarov cycliza-
tion.
1
14 6c: IR (neat) 1703 and 1641 cm–1; H NMR (CDCl3) δ
0.90 (3H, d, J = 6.5 Hz), 0.93–1.05 (2H, m), 1.21–1.28
(2H, m), 1.36–1.49 (1H, m), 1.61 (2H, br dt, J = 3.5, 13
Hz), 1.66–1.72 (2H, m), 1.77 (3H, dt, J = 1.4, 2.3 Hz), 2.39
(2H, quint, J = 2.3 Hz), and 7.23 (1H, tq, J = 2.3, 1.4 Hz).
15 D. Caine, in “Comprehensive Organic Synthesis,” ed. by
B. M. Trost, Pergamon Press, Oxford (1991), Vol. 3, p. 1.