order phenyl cuprate to provide product in good yield and
with moderate (ca. 4-10%) loss in enantiomeric purity.7
Another interesting and often exploited approach involves
various modifications of the Mitsunobu reaction.8 In 1972,
Mitsunobu and co-workers showed that (R)-2-octanol could
be displaced with ethyl cyanoacetate using triphenylphos-
phine (PPh3) and diethylazodicarboxylate (DEAD), though
product was isolated in low yield and with poor enantiomeric
purity.9 Much additional work has been carried out since
involving low pKa carbon acids and/or specialized activating
reagents with a variety of substrates, both racemic10 and
chiral.11 One particularly interesting example was established
by Palmisano and Cravotto wherein triethylmethanetricar-
boxylate (TEMT), PPh3, and DEAD were used to displace
a diverse array of racemic aliphatic and benzylic alcohols.12
A single chiral substrate was investigated in this work where-
in (S)-ethyl lactate was subjected to SN2-displacement to give
product in moderate yield and good enantioselectivity (87%
ee).13 Due to the simplicity of the reaction conditions and
ease with which the triester products undergo decarboxyla-
tion,10b,f we wanted to examine this reaction in more detail
with other chiral substrates.
Table 1. Optimization of the Mitsunobu Displacement
entry
T, °C
nucl equiv
PR3
solvent
yield, %
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0 to rt
0 to rt
rt
rt
rt
-78 to rt
-78 to rt
-78 to rt
-78 to rt
-78 to rt
1.5
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
PPh3 Et2O
PPh3 Et2O
PPh3 toluene
PCy3 toluene
PBu3 toluene
PBu3 toluene
42
40
12
0
70
72
73
85
75
49
PEt3
toluene
PMe3 toluene/THF
PMe3 THF
PMe3 THF
10
1.5
and 72% yield at -78 °C to rt. A less sterically crowded
phosphine, triethyl phosphine (PEt3), did not enhance
conversion, but trimethyl phosphine (PMe3) was found to
be particularly effective, giving 2 in 85% yield (entry 8) in
a mixture of THF/toluene (1:1) at low temperature. The use
of THF alone led to a slight decrease in yield (75%), and
the conversion suffered (49%) when only 1.5 equiv of the
nucleophile was employed (entry 10).
With a reasonable set of reaction conditions in hand, a
chiral substrate, (R)-R-methyl-2-naphthalenemethanol (3),
was examined to determine the stereoselectivity of this
transformation (Scheme 1). Reaction of the alcohol 3 in THF/
Initially, racemic 2-phenyl ethanol 1 was chosen for
exploration and reaction optimization (Table 1). Using the
original conditions of Palmisano and co-workers, a mixture
of the alcohol 1 (1 equiv), TEMT (1.5-2.0 equiv), and PPh3
(2 equiv) in Et2O at 0 °C was treated with DEAD14 (2 equiv)
followed by warming to room temperature to give the triester
adduct 2 in 40-42% assay yield.15 The use of a less polar
solvent such as toluene was not effective at all, nor was the
replacement of PPh3 with the more bulky tricyclohexylphos-
phine (PCy3). However, when tributylphosphine (PBu3) was
used, product was obtained in 70% yield at room temperature
Scheme 1
(6) Reed, L. A.; Huang, J. T.; McGregor, M.; Goodman, L. Carbohydr.
Res. 1994, 254, 133-140.
(7) Quallich, G. J.; Woodall, T. M. Tetrahedron 1992, 48, 10239-10248.
(8) For a general review of the Mitsunobu reaction, see: Hughes, D. L.
Org. Prep. Proc. Int. 1996, 28, 127-164.
(9) (a) Wada, M.; Mitsunobu, O. Tetrahedron Lett. 1972, 13, 1279-
1282. (b) Kurihara, T.; Suguzaki, M.; Kime, I.; Wada, M.; Mitsunobu, O.
Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1981, 54, 2107-2112.
(10) (a) Tsunoda, T.; Yamamiya, Y.; Ito, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1993, 34,
1639-1642. (b) Giovanni, B.; Sisti, M.; Palmisano, G. Tetrahedron:
Asymmetry 1997, 8, 515-518. (c) Shing, T. K. M.; Li, L.-H.; Narkunan,
K. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 1617-1622. (d) Tsunoda, T.; Uemoto, K.;
Ohtani, T.; Kabu, H.; Ito, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 7359-7362. (e)
Chaturvedi, S.; Otteson, K.; Bergot, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 8205-
8209. (f) Chaturvedi, S. Patent WO 00/10942. (g) Kim, G. T.; Wenz, M.;
Park, J. I.; Hasserodt, J.; Janda, K. D. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2002, 10, 1249-
1262. (h) Takacs, J. M.; Xu, Z.; Jiang, X.; Leonov, A. P.; Theriot, G. C.
Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 3843-3845.
(11) (a) Cabaret, D.; Maigrot, N.; Welvart, Z. Tetrahedron Lett. 1981,
22, 5279-5282. (b) Macor, J. E.; Wehner, J. M. Heterocycles 1993, 35,
349-365. (c) Ito, S.; Tsunoda, T. Pure Appl. Chem. 1999, 71, 1053-1057.
(d) Tsunoda, T.; Uemoto, K.; Nagino, C.; Kawamura, M.; Kaku, H.; Ito, S.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 7355-7358. (e) Uemoto, K.; Kawahito, A.;
Matashita, N.; Sakamoto, I.; Kaku, H.; Tsunoda, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001,
42, 905-907. (f) Fukumoto, S.; Fukushi, S.; Terao, S.; Shiraishi, M. J.
Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1996, 1021-1026.
toluene (1:1) at -78 °C gave the triester adduct 4 in 84%
yield and 93% ee, indicating that a slight amount of
racemization had occurred.16 In THF alone, product was
recovered in significantly lower yield (36%) but in the same
optical purity (93% ee). On the other hand, using toluene as
solvent at -53 °C to rt, 4 was isolated in 88% yield and
96% ee; thus, no loss in optical purity was observed during
the reaction. The displacement could even be carried out at
0 °C in a mixture of toluene:THF (4:1) to give 4 in 96% ee,
(12) Cravotto, G.; Giovenzana, G. B.; Sisti, M.; Palmisano, G. Tetra-
hedron 1996, 52, 13007-13016.
(13) The enantioselectivity of this reaction was determined by deriva-
tization, and comparison of optical rotation to that of a known intermediate.
(14) The activator diisopropylazodicarboxylate (DIAD) was found to be
approximately equivalent in this reaction manifold.
(15) Assay yields were determined via quantitative HPLC analysis by
comparison to a known amount of pure standard.
(16) See the Supporting Information for methods of ee determination.
574
Org. Lett., Vol. 6, No. 4, 2004