4
P. MA JEWSKA
Enantioselectivity assignment
Acknowledgment
The mixtures of biotransformations products (alcohol and unre-
acted ester) were analyzed by 31P NMR spectroscopy using qui-
nine as a chiral solvating agent and by analytical HPLC with
chiral column (CHIRALPAK AD, Diacel, gradient method:
15 min of isocratic flow of 1% of 2-propanol in n-hexane, 5 min
from 1% to 4% of 2-propanol in n-hexane, 15 min of isocratic
flow of 4% of 2-propanol in n-hexane, products retention time:
ester: (S) –11.5 min, (R) – 13 min, alcohol: (S) – 25 min, (R) –
26.5 min.)
I would like to thank Agnieszka Tysler, student at the Department of Chem-
istry, who helped in the implementation of the initial research.
Funding
This study was financed from the Project: “Biotransformations for phar-
maceutical and cosmetics industry” No. POIG.01.03.01-00-158/09 part-
financed by the European Union within the European Regional Develop-
ment Fund for the Innovative Economy.
The degree of the enantiomeric excess was expressed as a per-
centage (%) and defined as:
References
1. Kiss, N. Z.; Rádai, Z.; Mucsi, Z.; Keglevich, G. Heteroat. Chem. 2016,
27, 1-9.
2. Demkowicz, S.; Rachon´, J.; Da´sko, M.; Kozak, W. RSC Adv., 2016, 6,
7101-7112.
3. Kolodiazhnyi, O. I. Tetrahedron: Asymm. 2005, 16, 3295-3340.
4. Collinsova, M.; Jiracek, J. Curr. Med. Chem. 2000, 7, 629-647.
5. Wachtmeister, J.; Rother, D. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2016, 42, 169-177.
6. Skwarczyn´ski, M.; Lejczak, B.; Kafarski, P. Chirality 1999, 11, 109-114.
7. Majewska, P.; Kafarski, P.; Lejczak, B.; Bryndal, I.; Lis, T. Tetrahedron:
Asymmetry, 2006, 17, 2697-2701.
8. Majewska, P. Bioorg. Chem. 2015, 61, 28-35.
9. Malinowska, B.; Majewska, P.; Szatkowski, P.; Kafarski, P.; Lejczak, B.
Biocatal. Biotransform. 2011, 29, 271-277.
P1 − P2
ee =
× 100%
P1 + P2
where P1 and P2 are the values of the area under the signals
coming from the major and minor enantiomer of the product
respectively.
Enantiomeric ratio (E) was computed from the following for-
mula:
(1−ees )
ln[eep
ln[eep
]
]
(ees+eep)
E =
(1+ees )
(ees+eep)
10. Eggert, T.; Pouderoyen, G.; Dijkstra, B. W.; Jaeger, K.-E. FEBS Lett.
2001, 502, 89-92.
11. Joseph, B.; Ramteke, P. W.; Kumar, P. A. J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol. 2006,
52, 315-320.
Conclusions
The use of whole cells of Bacillus subtilis seems to be a method
of choice for obtaining α-hydroxyphosphonates with high enan-
tiomeric excess. The reaction conditions are environmentally
friendly and are compatible with the global trend of green chem-
istry. The use of culture medium as the reaction medium sub-
stantially accelerates the biotransformation, probably because
enzymes are already produced before introduction of substrate.
Additionally, the use of a substantially simpler and commercially
available cultivation medium is profitable, because its prepara-
tion is much easier and biotransformation reactions proceed
faster and more effective.
12. Immanuel, G.; Esakkiraj, P.; Jebadhas, A.; Iyapparaj, P.; Palavesam, A.
Food Technol. Biotechnol. 2008, 46, 60-65.
13. Kiran, G. S.; Shanmughapriya, S.; Jayalakshmi, J.; Selvin, J.; Gand-
himathi, R.; Sivaramakrishnan, S.; Arunkumar, M.; Thangavelu,
T.; Natarajaseenivasan, K. Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng. 2008, 31,
483-492.
14. Sharma, R.; Chisti, Y.; Banerjee, U. C. Biotechnol Adv. 2001, 19, 627-
662.
15. Prasanna Rajeshkumar, M.; Mahendran, V. S,; Balakrishnan, V. I.J.S.N.
2015, 6, 183-187.
16. Norul, A. S.; Nazira, M.; Tajuddin, S. N. Aust. J. Basic Appl. Sci 2015,
9, 155-159.