4158
H. Pajouhesh et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 22 (2012) 4153–4158
Table 8
Efficacy in the neuropathic SNL rat model for compounds 10 and 16
Compound
Tactile allodynia: maximum % antinociception at 60 min
Thermal hyperalgesia: maximum % antinociception at 60 min
10
16
1.9 1.4
54.2 12.9⁄⁄
85.8 14.1⁄⁄
31.7 6.9⁄⁄
Compounds, prepared in propylene glycol, were administered at a dose of 30 mg/kg po at 1 mL/kg after baseline assessment for neuropathic pain and behavioral assessments
were performed at 30 min intervals post-administration, up to 3 h. Data are the mean percent of maximal possible antinociception SEM; n = 5–6 animals. The following
formula was used to calculate the % anti-allodynic activity: 100% ꢄ [(paw withdrawal thresholds after drug treatment ꢂ postSNL baseline paw withdrawal thresholds)/
(preSNL baseline paw withdrawal thresholds ꢂ postSNL baseline paw withdrawal thresholds). The following formula was used to calculate the % anti-hyperalgesic activity:
100% ꢄ [(paw withdrawal latencies after drug treatment ꢂ postSNL baseline paw withdrawal latencies)/(preSNL baseline paw withdrawal latencies ꢂ postSNL baseline paw
withdrawal latencies). Data from the ipsilateral paw were also assessed by a one-way ANOVA-post-hoc for statistical significance. ⁄⁄P <0.01.
channel type. With
a few exceptions, each compound was examined for
teristics incorporating oral bioavailability and blood–brain barrier
penetration, and a wide therapeutic index against the cardiovascu-
lar, nervous and other systems. Similar to our previous reports,4,13
only a subset of high affinity in vitro N-type channel blockers in the
current study exhibited efficacy in rodent neuropathic and inflam-
matory pain models. An exact correlation between in vitro target
affinity and in vivo analgesia is generally lacking across many sim-
ilar studies, making direct compound-based predictive assess-
ments difficult and requiring empirical elucidation of efficacy. In
part, this may reflect a requirement for an optimal combination
of high affinity N-type channel blockade acting via a state- and/
or frequency-dependence mechanism and reflective of the under-
lying pathophysiology associated with specific pain states.14
blockade on 3–5 cells. Testing compounds for blockade of N-type and L-type
calcium channels was performed by whole-cell manual patch clamp analysis
using a near half-maximal concentration of compound applied to HEK293 cells
as per Ref.4. Pipettes (in the range of 2–4 M
X) were filled with an internal
solution containing 108 mM Cs-methanesulfonate, 4 mM MgCl2, 9 mM EGTA,
9 mM HEPES (pH 7.2 adjusted with TEA-OH) for N- and L-type channel currents
and 130 KCl, 1 MgCl2, 5 EGTA, 10 HEPES, 5 K2ATP (pH 7.2 with KOH) for hERG
K+ channel currents. Whole-cell barium currents were recorded using an
Axopatch 200B amplifier and an extracellular recording solution comprised of
5 mM BaCl2, 1 mM MgCl2, 10 mM HEPES, 40 mM TEA-Cl, 10 mM glucose,
97.5 mM CsCl (pH 7.2 adjusted with TEA-OH) for N- and L-type channel
currents and 137 NaCl, 4 KCl, 1.8 CaCl, 1 MgCl2, 10 HEPES, 10 glucose (pH 7.4
with NaOH) for hERG K+ channel currents. Data were filtered at 1 kHz using a
four pole Bessel filter and digitized at a sampling frequency of 2 kHz. Whole-
cell barium current inhibition was measured from a holding potential of
ꢂ80 mV to a test potential of +10 mV, applied at 0.2 Hz, or from a holding
potential of ꢂ80 mV to +1-mV following a 1 s prepulse to ꢂ60 mV, applied at
0.067 Hz for N-type channels. L-type channel currents were obtained from a
holding potential of ꢂ80 mV to a test potential of +10 mV, applied at 0.2 Hz. To
study compound effects on the hERG channel using manual patch clamp, the
peak of the slowly deactivating tail current was examined. A 2 s depolarization
to +60 mV from a holding potential of ꢂ80 mV, followed by a repolarization to
ꢂ50 mV was used to generate the hERG tail currents.
Acknowledgements
Work in the laboratories of T.P.S. and G.W.Z. is supported by the
Canadian Institutes of Health Research. T.P.S. is a Canada Research
Chair in Biotechnology and Genomics-Neurobiology. G.W.Z. is a
Scientist of the Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research
and is also supported by a Canada Research Chair in Molecular
Neurobiology.
The estimated IC50 value was then calculated for all compounds tested in the
various electrophysiological assays such that estimated IC50 = [D]/((1/fr)-1)
where [D] is the drug concentration, and fr is the fraction of current remaining
after drug application. This analysis assumes that there is a 1:1 interaction
between the drug and the channel. The term ‘estimated IC50 value’ is utilized
since the determination of IC50 value via a single concentration point may be
slightly less precise than fits to entire concentration-dependent response
curves. For some compounds IC50 values were obtained using data obtained
from multiple concentrations and fitted with a logistic function where max is
the maximum current amplitude in the absence of compound, min is the
minimum current amplitude at steady-state inhibition with the compound and
nH is the Hill slope:
References and notes
1. (a) Barclay, J. W.; Morgan, A.; Burgoyne, R. D. Cell Calcium 2005, 38, 343; (b)
Zheng, X.; Bobich, J. A. Brain Res. Bull. 1998, 47, 117.
2. (a) Bowersox, S. S.; Valentino, K. L.; Luther, R. R. Drug News Perspect. 1994, 7,
261; (b) Bean, B. P. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 1989, 51, 367; (c) Hess, P. Annu. Rev.
Neurosci. 1990, 13, 337; (d) Nooney, J. M.; Lambert, R. C.; Feltz, A. Trends
Pharmacol. Sci. 1997, 18, 363.
3. (a) Sheng, Z. H.; Rettig, J.; Cook, T.; Catterall, W. A. Nature 1996, 379, 451; (b)
Saegusa, H.; Kurihara, T.; Zong, S.; Kazuno, A.; Matsuda, Y.; Nonaka, T.; Han, W.;
Toriyama, H.; Tanabe, T. EMBO J. 2001, 20, 2349; (c) Cox, B.; Denyer, J. C. Expert
Opin. Ther. Patents 1998, 8, 1237.
4. Zamponi, G. W.; Feng, Z. P.; Zhang, L.; Pajouhesh, Ho.; Ding, Y.; Belardetti, F.;
Pajouhesh, Ha.; Dolphin, D.; Mitscher, L. A.; Snutch, T. P. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.
2009, 19, 6467.
"
#
max ꢂ min
ꢀ
ꢁ
nH
y ¼
þ min
½drugꢃ
1 þ
IC50
7. Pajouhesh, Ha.; Snutch, T.P.; Pajouhesh, Ho.; Ding, Y. U.S. Patent 20050014748
A1, 2005.
8. Pfeiffer, C. C. Science 1956, 124, 29.
9. (a) Dubuisson, D.; Dennis, S. G. Pain 1977, 4, 161; (b) Malmberg, A. B.; Yaksh, T.
L. J. Neurosci. 1994, 14, 4882.
10. Kim, S. H.; Chung, J. M. Pain 1992, 50, 355.
5. Pajouhesh, Ho..; Zamponi, G. W.; Pajouhesh, Ha..; Belardetti, F.; Snutch, T. P.
WO 2004/089922 and U.S. Patent 2004/0044004 A1.
6. The structure–activity analyses of the various chemical series were guided by
manual whole-cell patch clamp electrophysiological assay of rat neuronal N-
type (Bourinet, E.; Soong, T.-W.; Sutton, K.; Slaymaker, S.; Mathews, E.;
Monteil, A.; Zamponi, G. W.; Nargeot, J.; Snutch, T. P. Nat. Neurosci. 1999, 2, 407)
and L-type (Snutch, T. P.; Tomlinson, W. J.; Leonard, J. P.; Gilbert, M. M. Neuron
11. Chaplan, S. R.; Bach, F. W.; Pogrel, J. W.; Chung, J. M.; Yaksh, T. L. J. Neurosci.
Methods 1994, 53, 55.
12. Hargreaves, K.; Dubner, R.; Brown, F.; Flores, C.; Joris, J. Pain 1988, 32, 77.
13. Pajouhesh, Ho; Feng, Z.-P.; Ding, Y.; Zhang, L.; Pajouhesh, Ha; Morrison, J.-L.;
Belardetti, F.; Tringham, E.; Simonson, E.; Vanderah, T. W.; Porreca, F.;
Zamponi, G. W.; Mitscher, L. A.; Snutch, T. P. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2010,
20, 1378.
1991, 7, 45) channels transiently expressed in HEK293 cells (N-type: a1B
/
CaV2.2 + 2d-1 + b1b subunits; L-type: 1C/CaV1.2 + 2d-1 + b1b subunits).
a
a
a
Compounds were also assayed against the hERG potassium channel stably
expressed in HEK293 cells. Whole cell barium currents were elicited from a
holding potential of ꢂ100 mV to the peak of current–voltage relation for each
14. Snutch, T. P. NeuroRx 2005, 2, 662.