carbenoids are mainly used, and only a few examples are
therefore described for the cyclopropanation reaction with
unstable secondary and tertiary carbenoids.7 On the other
hand, diastereoselection in the hydrometalation of acyclic
compounds is controlled by allylic,2,8 homoallylic,9 and even
more remote stereogenic centers.10 Moderate to high levels
of anti selectivity are usually achieved.8-10 Therefore, we
thought that the diastereoselective reduction of cyclopro-
penylcarbinol11 such as 1a-h (Scheme 2) should be an
Scheme 3
cyclopropylcarbinol products 2a,b but with only a moderate
anti selectivity (anti/syn 80/20; deduced from comparison
with an authentic sample).15
Scheme 2
Table 1. Diastereoselective Reduction of
Cyclopropenylcarbinol into trans-Cyclopropylcarbinol
yields
(%)b
entry pdt R1
R2
R3
dra
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
1a
1b
H
H
CH2CH2Ph Et
80:20
80:20
>98:2
>98:2
>98:2
>98:2
85
50
86
74
80
75
80
64
CH3
Et
1c CH3 CH3
1d CH3 CH3
1e CH3
1f CH3
1g CH3 CH3
1h CH3 Si(CH3)3
Et
CH3
Et
c-C6H11
interesting and powerful solution to the preparation of trans-
cyclopropylcarbinol derivatives.
H
H
Cyclopropenylcarbinols 1a-h are themselves obtained in
one chemical step in good to excellent isolated yields from
1,1,2-trihalogenocyclopropanes (prepared by reaction of
substituted vinyl halide derivatives with bromoform in the
presence of a phase transfer catalyst such as cetrimide)12 by
a successive 1,2-dehalogenation reaction followed by a
halogen-lithium exchange and reaction with various alde-
hydes as described in Scheme 2.13
CH2CHdCHEt >98:2
Et
>98:2c
a Diastereomeric ratio was determined by 1H and 13C NMR of the crude
reaction mixture. b Yields of isolated pure products after column chroma-
tography. c Diastereomeric ratio of the trans-cyclopropylcarbinol versus the
secondary alcohol; ratio of the cis/trans cyclopropane itself is 40/60, see
text.
For correlation purposes, we have first reduced unsubsti-
tuted cyclopropenylcarbinols 1a,b (R1 ) H, R2 ) alkyl, see
Scheme 3 and Table 1, entries 1 and 2) with 1 equiv of
LiAlH4 in Et2O at +40 °C.14 Under these conditions, we were
pleased to obtain in good chemical yields the expected
On the other hand, when the three-membered ring of the
cyclopropenylcarbinol has a geminal dialkyl group such as
in 1c-h, excellent diastereoselectivities are obtained as
described in Table 1, entries 3 to 8.16
Indeed, the reduction of the fully substituted cyclopro-
penylcarbinol 1c occurs readily with 1 equiv of LiAlH4 in
Et2O to give anti-cyclopropylcarbinol 2c as a single diaste-
reoisomer. On the other hand, if only 0.5 equiv of LiAlH4 is
used, reduced products are obtained in low yields. Similarly,
if THF is used as solvent instead of Et2O, the anti/syn ratio
of the reaction drops to only 6:1 in low yield. The presence
of a free hydroxyl group is absolutely necessary for the
reduction of cyclopropenylcarbinol derivatives (obviously the
alcohol moiety is first deprotonated with LiAlH4), and as
illustration, when alcohol 1c was protected as its tert-
butyldimethylsilyl ether, no reduced product was observed
under our experimental conditions. Similarly, neither the
Schwartz reagent Cp2Zr(H)Cl or DIBAL-H led to the reduced
product. An even smaller R3 substituent can be used in this
diastereoselective reduction, such as the methyl group (Table
1, entry 4). The reduced product 2d is obtained as a single
diastereoisomer in good overall yield. On the other hand,
when R3 is an aromatic group, the reduction also occurs but
(7) (a) Groth, U.; Schollkopf, U.; Tiller, T. Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1991,
857. (b) Charette, A. B.; Lemay, J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1997, 36,
1090. (c) Charette, A. B.; Marcoux, J.-F.; Molinaro, C.; Beauchemin, A.;
Brochu, C.; Isabel, E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 4508. (d) Shibli, A.;
Varghese, J. P.; Knochel, P.; Marek, I. Synlett 2001, 818.
(8) (a) Midland, M. M.; Kwon, Y. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985, 107,
3725. (b) Still, W. C.; Barrish, J. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1983, 105, 2487.
(c) Heathcock, C. H.; Jarvi, E. T.; Rosen, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1984, 25,
243.
(9) (a) Evans, D. A.; Bartoli, J.; Godel, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1982, 23,
4577. (b) Nicolaou, K. C.; Pavia, M. R.; Seitz, S. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1982, 104, 2027. (c) Schulte-Elte, K. H.; Ohloff, G. HelV. Chim. Acta 1967,
50, 153.
(10) Still, W. C.; Darst, K. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980, 102, 7387.
(11) Cyclopropene derivatives are well-known and were successfully used
in synthesis. For recent review, see: (a) Nakamura, M.; Isobe, H.; Nakamura,
E. Chem. ReV. 2003, 103, 1295. (b) Houben-Weyl, Methods in Organic
Chemistry, Carbocyclic Three-Membered Ring Compounds; de Meijere, A.,
Ed.; Thieme: Stuttgart, Germany, 1997; Vol. E 17d, p 2695. (c) Stoll, A.
T.; Negishi, E. Tetrahedron Lett. 1985, 26, 5671.
(12) Baird, M. S.; Hussain, H. H.; Nethercott, W. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans. 1 1986, 1845.
(13) (a) Baird, M. S.; Nethercott, W. Tetrahedron Lett. 1983, 24, 605.
(b) Baird, M. S.; Hussain, H. H. Tetrahedron 1987, 43, 215. (c) Al-
Dulayymi, J. R.; Baird, M. S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1988, 29, 6147. (d) Al-
Dulayymi, J. R.; Baird, M. S. Tetrahedron 1989, 45, 7601. (e) Al-Dulayymi,
A. R.; Baird, M. S. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1994, 1547.
(14) (a) Vincens, M.; Dumont, C.; Vidal, M.; Domnin, I. N. Tetrahedron
1983, 39, 4281. (b) Vidal, M.; Arnaud, P. Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr. 1972, 675.
(15) (a) Charette, A. B.; Lebel, H. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 2966.
(16) Diastereoselectivity is measured by 1H and 13C NMR on the crude
reaction mixture.
342
Org. Lett., Vol. 6, No. 3, 2004