F. Boeda et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 47 (2006) 5021–5024
Table 2. Extension to various allylic alcohols via Scheme 4
5023
Entry
R1
R2
Alcohol
Ligand
Duration (h)
Conversion (%)
Aldehyde
Isolated yield (%)
ee %
1a
2b
3a
4c
5a
6
Ph
Cy
i-Pr
p-Tol
Ph
i-Pr
Me
Ph
i-Pr
Me
i-Pr
i-Pr
1
2
3
4
5
1
1
(R)-L1
(R)-L1
(R)-L1
(R)-L1
(R)-L1
(R,R,R)-L2
(S,R,R)-L2
30
30
30
30
30
96
96
100
100
100
100
100
30d
30d
6
7
6
8
9
6
6
87
84
85
86
89
—
—
70 (R)
66 (R)
38 (S)
60 (R)
64 (R)
7 (R)
Ph
Ph
7a
6 (R)
a The ee was analyzed on a Lipodex E column (25 m).
b The ee was analyzed on a Chiraldex G-TA column (30 m).
c The ee was analyzed from NMR analysis after conversion of the enantiomeric mixture to the diastereoisomeric mixture of amine 10.17
d 10 mol % of the catalyst was used.
Me
2. Trost, B. M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1995, 34, 259–
281.
3. (a) Shakhidayatov, Kh. Russ. Chem. Rev. 1970, 39, 859;
(b) Van der Drift, R. C.; Bouwman, E.; Drent, E.
J. Organomet. Chem. 2002, 650, 1–24; (c) Uma, R.;
Rh+/(
R)-L1
7 mol%
D D
OH
D
Me
Toluene, 105 °C
O
D
11
30h
´
´
12
Crevisy, C.; Gree, R. Chem. Rev. 2003, 103, 27–51.
4. (a) Botteghi, C.; Giacomelli, G. Gazz. Chim. Ital. 1976,
106, 1131–1134; (b) Tani, K. Pure Appl. Chem. 1985, 57,
1845–1854; (c) Otsuka, S.; Tani, K. Synthesis 1991, 665–
680; (d) Chapuis, C.; Barthe, M.; de Saint Laumer, J.-Y.
Helv. Chim. Acta 2001, 84, 230–242.
Scheme 5. Reaction of labelled compound 11.
isomeric (S,R,R)-L2 ligand. This disappointing result
shows that the efficiency of the reaction is dramatically
decreased by a sterically demanding ligand.
5. (a) Tanaka, K.; Qiao, S.; Tobisu, M.; Lo, M. M.-C.; Fu,
G. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 9870–9871; (b)
Tanaka, K.; Fu, G. C. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 8177–8186.
6. Ito, M.; Kitahara, S.; Ikariya, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005,
127, 6172–6173.
7. See for instance (a) van den Berg, M.; Minnaard, A. J.;
Schudde, E. P.; van Esch, J.; de Vries, A. H. M.; de Vries,
J. G.; Feringa, B. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 11539–
11540; (b) Bernsmann, H.; van den Berg, M.; Hoen, R.;
Minnaard, A. J.; Mehler, G.; Reetz, M. T.; de Vries, J. G.;
Feringa, B. L. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 943–951, and
references cited therein.
Finally, we started preliminary mechanistic studies. The
1,1-dideuterated allylic alcohol 11 was synthesized
according to known procedures.5 Then, it was reacted
with 7% catalyst. A clean formation of aldehyde 12
was observed. Compound 12 bears a deuterium atom
on C-sp2 carbon and more interestingly a second deute-
rium atom on C-3 carbon (Scheme 5).18 This result dem-
onstrates that the reaction proceeds through a 1,3-H
migration pathway.
8. See for instance Duursma, A.; Minnaard, A. J.; Feringa,
B. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 3700–3701.
9. Jensen, J. F.; Svendsen, B. Y.; la Cour, T. V.; Pedersen, H.
L.; Johannsen, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 4558–
4559.
10. Graening, T.; Hartwig, J. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127,
17192–17193.
To conclude, we demonstrate for the first time that
phosphoramidites are valuable ligands for the enantio-
selective Rh-catalyzed isomerization of allylic alcohols to
chiral aldehydes. The isolated yields are high and the
ee’s encouraging. The search for better mono- and bi-
dentate phosphoramidite ligands for this isomerization
reaction is now actively underway.
11. Ma, M. F. P.; Li, K.; Zhou, Z.; Tang, C.; Chan, A. S. C.
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1999, 10, 3259–3261.
12. Rimkus, A.; Sewald, N. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 79–80.
13. The necessity to hydrogenate the mixture of
[Rh(COD)2]BF4 and the ligand has been proved:
[Rh(COD)2]BF4 and 2 equiv of ligand (R)-L1 were mixed
and the allylic alcohol was then added. After 48 h at
105 °C, no trace of aldehyde was detected. The hydro-
genation step perhaps hydrogenates off the COD from the
precatalyst, which can be assumed to be from previous
work, [Rh(COD)L12]BF4.14 Besides, the structure of the
exact active catalytic species, particularly the number of
ligands borne by the metal, has not yet been proved. This
aspect has been discussed in the case of an hydrogenation
reaction catalyzed by a Rh/phosphoramidite catalyst.15
14. (a) Hu, A.-G.; Fu, Y.; Xie, J.-H.; Zhou, H.; Wang, L.-X.;
Zhou, Q.-L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 2348–2350;
(b) Reetz, M. T.; Ma, J.-A.; Goddard, R. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 412–415; (c) Liu, Y.; Ding, K. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 10488–10489.
Acknowledgements
We thank the Ministry of Education for the award of
doctoral grant for F.B., Pierre Guenot (CRMPO, Re-
nnes) for performing mass spectroscopy experiments
and Professor Gregory Fu (MIT, Boston) for fruitful
exchanges of information.
References and notes
1. (a) Tani, K.; Yamagata, T.; Akutagawa, S.; Kumoba-
yashi, H.; Taketomi, T.; Takaya, H.; Miyashita, A.;
Noyori, R.; Otsuka, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 5208–
5217; (b) Akutagawa, S. In Chirality in Industry; Collins,
A. N., Sheldrake, G. N., Crosby, J., Eds.; Wiley: New
York, 1992.
15. van den Berg, M.; Minnaard, A. J.; Haak, R. M.; Leeman,
M.; Schudde, E. P.; Meetsma, A.; Feringa, B. L.; de Vries,
A. H. M.; Maljaars, C. E. P.; Willans, C. E.; Hyett, D.;