155 (eq 1).
thatsunlike many of the formylating agents listed by
LarocksFe(CO)5 is commercially available.
In the event, ortho-lithiation of 5 to 6 followed by
reaction with Fe(CO)5 and treatment with acetic acid
(presumably7 for protonolysis of the carbonyl/iron bond)
gave 7 in excellent yield.
The remainder of the synthesis proceeded uneventfully.
Condensation of 7 with ethanolamine gave imine 8, which
was ordinarily not isolated but reduced in situ to 9 with
NaBH3CN. Heating of 9 neat at 180 °C resulted in
cyclization, affording 10. We have previously described
the utility of MeSLi in hot hexamethylphosphoramide
(HMPA) for the nucleophilic cleavage of aryl methyl
ethers.8 Use of the commercially available sodium ana-
logue MeSNa9 in HMPA at 160 °C led to selective
monodeprotection of the less hindered ether in 10 to give
phenol 11. Finally, the prenylation of 11 afforded 3. The
melting point and spectra of synthetic 3 are in excellent
agreement with those reported1 for natural porritoxin.
In conclusion, we have accomplished the first total
synthesis of porritoxin and confirmed that the revised
structure 3 is that of the natural product.
To our surprise, ortho-lithiation of 5 with s-BuLi
followed by attempted formylation with dimethylforma-
mide or methyl formate led either to formation of only
traces of 7 and recovery of 5 or, under forcing conditions
(e.g., reaction of 6 with DMF or methyl formate at 60
°C), nonproductive consumption of 5. Inclusion of addi-
tives (HMPA or tetramethylethylenediamine) or use of
solvents other than THF failed to circumvent the im-
passe. D2O-quench studies gave 16 (assayed by integra-
tion of the resonance for the aromatic proton(s) in 5/16),
establishing that formation of 6 was occurring cleanly.
Given the positive precedents (eq 1), we attribute the
failure of 6 to react with HCONMe2/HCOOMe to a
buttressing effect in which the C-4 methyl in 6 forces the
C-3 methoxy into a conformation that inhibits reaction
with HCONMe2/HCOOMe. Use of the less sterically
encumbered diethylamide analogue 17 did not improve
the outcome. Since 6 does react with D2O (to give 16), 6
is clearly capable of reaction. Thus, a formylating agent
more reactive than HCONMe2/HCOOMe but compatible
with the aprotic environment necessitated by an orga-
nolithio species was required. Examination of Larock’s6
three-page list of anion-compatible formylating agents did
not lead to an obvious sure cure, but the list included
iron pentacarbonyl. The relative reactivity of Fe(CO)5 vis-
a`-vis HCOOMe was not clear, but Fe(CO)5 was listed as
a reagent that formylates Grignard reagents.7 A particu-
larly compelling argument in favor of trying Fe(CO)5 is
Exp er im en ta l Section 10
N,N-Diisop r op yl-3,5-d im eth oxy-4-m eth ylben za m id e (5).
A suspension of 3,5-dimethoxy-4-methylbenzoic acid (4) (10.2 g,
51.0 mmol) in SOCl2 (15.0 mL, 206 mmol) was stirred under N2
at 80 °C until gas evolution ceased (ca. 0.5 h). Excess SOCl2 was
then removed by repeated azeotropic distillation with dry toluene
(3 × 100 mL) in vacuo (rotary evaporator at 40 °C, ca. 6 Torr),
and the resulting brownish solid was dissolved in dry CH2Cl2
(20 mL). i-Pr2NH (15.0 mL, 107 mmol) was then added via
syringe dropwise over 15 min; the reaction was exothermic, and
a precipitate formed. The resulting mixture was stirred over-
night (14 h) at room temperature to ensure complete reaction
and then diluted with more CH2Cl2 (80 mL) and washed with 1
N NaOH (200 mL). The aqueous wash was extracted with more
CH2Cl2 (100 mL), and the combined organic phases were
successively washed with water and brine and dried over
magnesium sulfate. The solvent was evaporated in vacuo to give
a crystalline brownish solid which was purified by flash column
chromatography on silica gel (8 × 7 cm) with 2% then 5% (v/v)
MeOH in CH2Cl2 as eluent to yield a slightly yellow crystalline
solid (12.9 g, 90%): mp 117-118 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3)
δ 6.47 (s, 2 H), 3.81 (s, 6 H), 3.69 (bs, 2 H), 2.08 (s, 3 H), 1.46
(bs, 6 H), 1.24 (bs, 6 H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 170.9,
157.9, 136.9, 114.9, 101.0, 55.8, 20.9, 8.3 (due to coincidence or
broadening into the baseline, one peak appears missing); IR
(film) ν 2967, 2935, 1630, 1606 cm-1; HRMS (ESI) calcd for
* Corresponding author.
C
16H25NO3Na [M + Na] 302.1732, found 302.1725. Anal. Calcd
(1) Suemitsu, R.; Ohnishi, K.; Horiuchi, M.; Kitaguchi, A.; Odamura,
K. Phytochemistry 1992, 31, 2325-2326.
(2) Horiuchi, M.; Maoka, T.; Iwase, N.; Ohnishi, K. J . Nat. Prod.
2002, 65, 1204-1205.
for C16H25NO3: C, 68.79; H, 9.02; N, 5.01. Found: C, 68.84; H,
9.10; N, 5.01.
2-F or m yl-N,N-d iisop r op yl-3,5-d im eth oxy-4-m eth ylben -
za m id e (7). A 1.40 M solution of s-butyllithium in hexanes (0.80
mL, 1.1 mmol) was added dropwise to a solution of N,N-
diisopropyl-3,5-dimethoxy-4-methylbenzamide (5) (313 mg, 1.12
mmol) in dry THF (10 mL) stirred under Ar at -78 °C in a dry
ice/acetone bath. After 1 h at the same temperature, D2O-quench
of a 0.1 mL aliquot showed correct deuterium incorporation by
1H NMR. Iron pentacarbonyl (0.16 mL, 1.2 mmol; CAUTION:
p yr op h or ic a n d h igh ly toxic) was added dropwise over 1 min,
and the reaction mixture was allowed to warm to room temper-
ature overnight (ca. 11 h). Glacial acetic acid (0.10 mL, 1.7 mmol)
was added in one portion to the dark green solution, and the
resulting deep red mixture was stirred for 15 min. Dilution with
(3) Ayer, W. A.; Miao, S. Can. J . Chem. 1993, 71, 487-493.
(4) Chen, C.-W.; Beak, P. J . Org. Chem. 1986, 51, 3325-3334. The
conversion of 12 to 14 had already been reproduced in good yield in
our laboratories (Scopton, A.; Kelly, T. R., unpublished results).
(5) (a) Hauser, F. M.; Hewawasam, P.; Baghdanov, V. M. J . Org.
Chem. 1988, 53, 223-224. (b) Evans, J . C.; Klix, R. C.; Bach, R. D. J .
Org. Chem. 1988, 53, 5519-5527. (c) Parker, K. A.; Spero, D. M.;
Koziski, K. A. J . Org. Chem. 1987, 52, 183-188.
(6) Larock, R. C. Comprehensive Organic Transformations, 2nd ed.;
Wiley-VCH: New York, 1999; pp 1381-1383.
(7) Yamashita, M.; Miyoshi, K.; Nakazono, Y.; Suemitsu, R. Bull.
Chem. Soc. J pn. 1982, 55, 1663-1664.
(8) Kelly, T. R.; Dali, H. M.; Tsang, W.-G. Tetrahedron Lett. 1977,
3859-3860.
(9) For an early use of CH3SNa, see: Kornblum, N.; Scott, A. J . Am.
Chem. Soc. 1974, 96, 590-591. For an overview of aryl methyl ether
cleavage with thiolates, see: Merriman, G. In Encyclopedia of Reagents
for Organic Synthesis; Paquette, L. A., Ed.; Wiley: New York, 1995;
Vol. 5, pp 3161-3163.
(10) For general experimental procedures see the Supporting In-
formation in: Kelly, T. R.; Silva, R. A.; De Silva, H.; J asmin, S.; Zhao,
Y. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 6935-6949.
2192 J . Org. Chem., Vol. 69, No. 6, 2004