Formation and Structural Characterization of [RuCl2(CO) 2(SPh2)2], [RuCl2(CO) 3(OH2)], and [Ru(OH2)6][RuCl 3(CO)3]2·2H2O

Article abstract of DOI:10.1515/znb-2003-1005

While the room temperature reaction of [RuCl₂(CO) ₃]₂ and Ph₂S in tetrahydrofuran in air affords [RuCl₂(CO)₂(SPh₂)₂] (1) in moderate yield, that in dichloromethane results in the formation of a mixture of [RuCl₂(CO)₃(H₂O)] (2) and [Ru(H ₂O)₆][RuCl₃(CO)₃] ₂·2H₂O (3). Very small amounts of 1 are produced only upon prolonged reflux of the reagents. All compounds were characterized by X-ray crystallography. 1 crystallizes as discrete octahedral cis(CO), cis(Cl), trans(Ph₂S) complexes, which are joined into stacks by weak H?Cl hydrogen bonds. 2 is also composed of discrete octahedral complexes. Four hydrogen bonds involving aqua and chlorido ligands link two complexes into a dimer. The structure of 3 consists of octahedral hexaaquaruthenium cations and two tricarbonyl-trichloridoruthenate anions. The water of crystallization is involved in hydrogen bonding between the cations and anions resulting in the formation of a continuous three-dimensional network.

Full text of DOI:10.1515/znb-2003-1005

Formation and Structural Characterization of [RuCl2(CO)2(SPh2)2],
[RuCl2(CO)3(OH2)], and [Ru(OH2)6][RuCl3(CO)3]2 · 2H2O
Marjaana Taimistoa, Raija Oilunkaniemia, Risto S. Laitinena, and Markku Ahlgre´nb
a Department of Chemistry, P. O. Box 3000, FIN-90014 University of Oulu, Finland
b Department of Chemistry, University of Joensuu, P. O. Box 111, FIN-80101 Joensuu, Finland
Reprint requests to Prof. R. Laitinen. Fax: +358-8-553-1608. E-mail: Risto.Laitinen@oulu.fi
or Dr. R. Oilunkaniemi. E-mail: Raija.Oilunkaniemi@oulu.fi
Z. Naturforsch. 58b, 959 – 964 (2003); received June 18, 2003
While the room temperature reaction of [RuCl2(CO)3]2 and Ph2S in tetrahydrofuran in air affords
[RuCl2(CO)2(SPh2)2] (1) in moderate yield, that in dichloromethane results in the formation of a
mixture of [RuCl2(CO)3(H2O)] (2) and [Ru(H2O)6][RuCl3(CO)3]2·2H2O (3). Very small amounts
of 1 are produced only upon prolonged reflux of the reagents. All compounds were characterized by
X-ray crystallography. 1 crystallizes as discrete octahedral cis(CO), cis(Cl), trans(Ph2S) complexes,
which are joined into stacks by weak H···Cl hydrogen bonds. 2 is also composed of discrete octahe-
dral complexes. Four hydrogen bonds involving aqua and chlorido ligands link two complexes into
a dimer. The structure of 3 consists of octahedral hexaaquaruthenium cations and two tricarbonyl-
trichloridoruthenate anions. The water of crystallization is involved in hydrogen bonding between
the cations and anions resulting in the formation of a continuous three-dimensional network.
Key words: Ruthenium Complex, Diphenyl Sulfide, Crystal Structure
Introduction
this species is an intermediate in the pathway to the
monosubstituted [RuCl2(CO)3(ERR’)]. We have, in
fact, observed that the reaction of [RuCl2(CO)3]2 and
Ph2S in THF produces [RuCl2(CO)2(SPh2)2] (1) in
moderate yield [3]. However, the analogous reaction
of [RuCl2(CO)3]2 and Ph2Te in CH2Cl2 also affords
[RuCl2(CO)2(TePh2)2] in good yield [2].
Mononuclear chalcogenoether complexes of ruthe-
nium [RuCl2(CO)2(ERR’)2] (E = S, Se, Te; R,R’ =
alkyl, phenyl) have been prepared by treatment of
RR’E with RuCl3 · nH2O [1] or [RuX2(CO)3]n (X =
Cl, Br, I) [1 – 3]. The crystal structures, NMR spec-
troscopic information, and DFT calculations indicate
that the cis(CO), cis(Cl), trans(ERR’) isomer is en-
ergetically most favoured in each case [3]. The route
for these complexes appears to involve the symmet-
ric cleavage of bridging Ru-Cl bonds of the dinu-
clear ruthenium complex [2] with the formation of a
[RuCl2(CO)3(ERR’)] intermediate that has been iso-
lated and structurally characterized in the case of
Me2Se [3]. The final substitution of CO that lies
in the trans-position to the RR’E ligand by another
molecule of the chalcogenide affords the end product
[RuCl2(CO)2(ERR’)2].
The solvent seems to play a role in these substitu-
tion reactions. When the reaction was carried out in
a coordinating solvent like tetrahydrofuran (THF), a
mononuclear complex [RuCl2(CO)3(THF)] has been
observed and identified by X-ray crystallography [3].
The crystal structure of this complex has recently been
reported by Gray and Duffin [4]. It is probable that
In order to establish the significance of the sol-
vent in these ligand substitution reactions we car-
ried out the reaction of [RuCl2(CO)3]2 and Ph2S
also in CH2Cl2. Only very small amounts of 1
were obtained upon prolonged reflux of the reagents.
At room temperature, a mixture of colourless crys-
tals that turned out to be [RuCl2(CO)3(OH2)] (2)
and [Ru(H2O)6][RuCl3(CO)3]2·2H2O (3) was formed.
Since the reaction was carried out in air, the water orig-
inates from traces in the solvent or from humidity.
Experimental Section
SPh2 (0.12 ml, 0.72 mmol, 0.134 g) was added to a sus-
pension of [RuCl2(CO)3]2 (0.081 g, 0.16 mmol) in CH2Cl2
(15 ml). The reaction mixture was stirred at room tempera-
ture for several days. n-Hexane was added to the filtered and
concentrated solution and the mixture was cooled to −20 ◦C.
The colourless crystals that were formed upon prolonged
c
0932–0776 / 03 / 1000–0959 $ 06.00 ꢀ 2003 Verlag der Zeitschrift fu¨r Naturforschung, Tu¨bingen · http://znaturforsch.com
Brought to you by | Tufts University
Authenticated
Download Date | 7/10/18 10:19 AM

960
M. Taimisto et al. · Formation and Structural Characterization of [RuCl2(CO)2(SPh2)2]
Table 1. Details of the
structure determination of
[RuCl2(CO)2(SPh2)2] (1),
[RuCl2(CO)3(OH2)] (2),
and [Ru(OH2)6][RuCl3-
(CO)3]2· 2H2O (3).
Compound
C26H20Cl2O2RuS2 (1) C3H2Cl2O4Ru (2) C3H8O7Cl3Ru1.5 (3)
Relative molecular mass
Crystal system
Space group
600.51
monoclinic
P21P
274.02
monoclinic
P21/n
414.05
triclinic
¯
P1
˚
a (A)
6.475(1)
17.365(4)
11.629(2)
90
103.18(3)
90
6.282(1)
10.332(2)
11.866(2)
90
97.73(3)
90
6.246(1)
7.160(1)
14.800(3)
91.80(3)
98.21(3)
115.16(3)
589.8(2)
2
˚
b (A)
˚
c (A)
α (deg)
β (deg)
γ (deg)
3
˚
V (A )
1273.1(4)
2
763.1(3)
4
Z
F(000)
604
1.567
1.011
293(2)
2.15 – 26.00
520
2.385
2.706
150(2)
2.62 – 25.99
398
2.332
2.632
140(2)
Dc (g cm−3
)
µ(Mo-Kα ) (mm−1
T (K)
θ-Range for data collection
)
1.40 – 25.99
Structure determination
Crystal size (mm)
0.15 * 0.10 * 0.10
16141
4939
4353
299/1
0.0496
0.0334
0.0753
0.0447
0.20 * 0.15 * 0.12 0.20 * 0.15 * 0.15
Number of reflections collected
Number of unique reflections
Number of observed reflectionsa
Number of parameters/restrains
RINbT
5624
6119
1456
2304
1347
2083
100/2
145/8
0.0182
0.0242
0.0571
0.0306
0.0780
l.393
0.0298
0.0564
0.1683
0.0618
0.l731
l.104
R1
wR2
b
R1 (all data)
wR2 (all data)
Goodness-of-fit
0.0880
l.146
Max and min heights in final
difference Fourier synthesis (e A
0.369 – 0.449
l.645 – 0.962
l.939 – 4.351
−3
˚
)
a
1/2
I ≥ 2σ(I); b R = ||F |−|F || / |F |, wR = {[ w(F2 −F2)2] / [ w(F2)2]}
.
∑
∑
∑
∑
1
o
c
o
2
o
c
o
standing were identified as a mixture of [RuCl2(CO)3(H2O)] and an empirical absorption correction was applied to the net
(2) and [Ru(H2O)6][RuCl3(CO)3]2·2H2O (3).
intensities. The structures were solved by direct methods us-
ing SHELXS-97 [5] and refined using SHELXL-97 [6]. After
the full-matrix least-squares refinement of the non-hydrogen
atoms with anisotropic displacement parameters the hydro-
gen atoms were placed in calculated positions in the H2O
The reaction was also carried out by refluxing 0.337 g
(0.67 mmol) of [RuCl2(CO)3]2 and 0.7 ml (4.20 mmol) of
SPh2 in 30 ml CH2Cl2 for 7 h. The solvent was evaporated
from the filtrate. n-Hexane was added to the oily residue
and the precipitate obtained was washed with hexane and
dried. Elemental analysis and X-ray crystallographic mea-
surements indicated that the precipitate was a mixture of
[RuCl2(CO)2(SPh2)2] (1) and [RuCl2(CO)3]2.
˚
molecules (O-H = 0.82 A) and the aromatic rings (C-H =
˚
0.98 A). The scattering factors for the neutral atoms were
those incorporated with the programs.
Results and Discussion
Diffraction data of 1 – 3 were collected on a Nonius kappa
CCD diffractometer using graphite monochromated Mo-Kα
The molecular structure of 1 is shown in Fig. 1
together with the atomic numbering scheme. Se-
lected bond distances and angles are listed in Ta-
ble 2. The structure consists of discrete complexes.
The coordination polyhedron around ruthenium is a
slightly distorted octahedron [the cis bond angles
span a range of 83.86(5)– 101.1(2)◦]. The complex
has the cis(CO), cis(Cl), trans(SPh2) ligand arrange-
ment that was found to be the energetically most
favoured isomer also by preliminary DFT calcula-
tions [3]. The two Ru-S bond lengths are 2.387(1) and
˚
radiation (λ = 0.71073 A). Crystal data and the details of the
structure determination are shown in Table 1∗. The reflec-
tion data were corrected for Lorentz and polarization effects
∗Crystallographic information (excluding tables of structure fac-
tors) for the compound 1 has been deposited with the Cambridgde
Crystallographic Data Center as supplementary publication number
CCDC 212907. Copies of the data can be obtained free of charge
on application to CCDC, 12 Union Road, Cambridge CB2 1EZ, UK
(fax. +44-1223-336-033; e-mail: deposit@ccde.cam.ac.uk). That for
the compounds 2 and 3 has been deposited with the Fachinforma-
tionszentrum Karlsruhe, D-76344 Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Ger-
many as supplementary publication no. CSD 413218 and 413219.
Brought to you by | Tufts University
Authenticated
Download Date | 7/10/18 10:19 AM

M. Taimisto et al. · Formation and Structural Characterization of [RuCl2(CO)2(SPh2)2]
961
◦
˚
Table 2. Selected bond lengths (A) and angles ( ) in
[RuCl2(CO)2(SPh2)2] (1), [RuCl2(CO)3(OH2)] (2), and
[Ru(OH2)6][RuCl3(CO)3]2 ·2H2O (3).
Bond length
Bond angle
[RuCl2(CO)2(SPh2)2] (1)
Ru(1)-S(1)
Ru(1)-S(2)
Ru(1)-Cl(1)
Ru(1)-Cl(2)
Ru(1)-C(1)
Ru(1)-C(2)
S(1)-C(111)
S(1)-C(121)
S(1)-C(211)
S(1)-C(221)
C(1)-O(1)
2.388(1) S(1)-Ru(1)-C(2)
2.406(1) S(2)-Ru(1)-Cl(1)
2.435(1) S(2)-Ru(1)-Cl(2)
2.412(1) S(2)-Ru(1)-C(1)
1.877(5) S(2)-Ru(1)-C(2)
1.883(5) Cl(1)-Ru(1)-Cl(2)
1.793(5) Cl(1)-Ru(1)-C(1)
1.780(5) Cl(1)-Ru(1)-C(2)
1.799(5) Cl(2)-Ru(1)-C(1)
1.804(5) Cl(2)-Ru(1)-C(2)
1.135(6) C(1)-Ru(1)-C(2)
1.126(6) C(111)-S(1)-C(121)
C(211)-S(2)-C(221)
90.4(2)
84.21(5)
83.86(5)
92.7(2)
101.1(2)
92.14(4)
88.1(2)
174.2(2)
176.5(2)
86.0(2)
94.1(2)
C(2)-O(2)
102.7(3)
104.4(2)
112.7(2)
111.5(2)
114.5(2)
110.1(2)
S(1)-Ru(1)-S(2)
S(1)-Ru(1)-Cl(1)
S(1)-Ru(1)-Cl(2)
S(1)-Ru(1)-C(1)
166.19(4) C(111)-S(1)-Ru(1)
84.08(5) C(121)-S(1)-Ru(1)
89.28(5) C(211)-S(2)-Ru(1)
94.3(2) C(221)-S(2)-Ru(1)
Fig. 1. The molecular structure of [RuCl2(CO)2(SPh2)2]
(1) indicating the numbering of the atoms. The thermal
ellipsoids have been drawn at 50% probability.
[RuCl2(CO)3(OH2)] (2)
Ru(1)-C(1)
Ru(1)-C(2)
Ru(1)-C(3)
Ru(1)-O(4)
Ru(1)-Cl(1)
Ru(1)-Cl(2)
1.885(3) C(2)-Ru(1)-0(4)
1.916(3) C(3)-Ru(1)-0(4)
1.927(4) C(1)-Ru(1)-Cl(1)
2.148(2) C(2)-Ru(1)-Cl(1)
2.408(1) C(3)-Ru(1)-C1(1)
2.401(1) O(4)-Ru(1)-Cl(1)
C(1)-Ru(1)-Cl(1)
91.3(1)
91.4(1)
89.14(9)
179.26(8)
88.1(1)
88.18(7)
90.2(1)
C(1)-Ru(1)-C(2)
C(1)-Ru(1)-C(3)
C(2)-Ru(1)-C(3)
C(1)-Ru(1)-O(4)
91.4(1) C(2)-Ru(1)-Cl(2)
90.9(1) C(3)-Ru(1)-Cl(2)
92.5(1) O(4)-Ru(1)-Cl(2)
176.5(1) Cl(1)-Ru(1)-Cl(2)
88.59(9)
178.5(1)
87.49(7)
90.86(3)
[Ru(OH2)6][RuCl3(CO)3]2·2H2O (3)
Ru(1)-O(11)
Ru(1)-O(12)
Ru(1)-O(.3)
Ru(2)-C(21)
Ru(2)-C(22)
Ru(2)-C(23)
Ru(2)-Cl(21)
Ru(2)-Cl(22)
Ru(2)-Cl(23)
2.118(6) C(21)-Ru(1)-C(23)
93.5(4)
89.5(3)
178.5(3)
89.1(3)
91.7(4)
174.9(3)
88.5(3)
86.6(3)
92.5(3)
86.8(3)
176.9(3)
88.98(8)
89.10(8)
90.65(8)
2.081(6) C(21)-Ru(1)-Cl(21)
2.070(6) C(21)-Ru(1)-Cl(22)
1.899(10) C(21)-Ru(1)-Cl(23)
1.879(9) C(22)-Ru(1)-C(23)
1.911(10) C(22)-Ru(1)-Cl(21)
2.426(2) C(22)-Ru(1)-Cl(22)
2.422(2) C(22)-Ru(1)-Cl(23)
2.410(2) C(23)-Ru(1)-Cl(21)
C(23)-Ru(1)-Cl(22)
C(11)-Ru(1)-O(12)
C(11)-Ru(1)-O(13)
C(12)-Ru(1)-O(13)
C(21)-Ru(1)-C(22)
92.3(3) C(23)-Ru(1)-Cl(23)
89.4(3) Cl(21)-Ru(1)-Cl(22)
89.2(3) Cl(21)-Ru(1)-Cl(23)
93.0(4) Cl(22)-Ru(1)-Cl(23)
˚
2.406(1) A, similar to those in mer-[RuCl3(SMe2)3]
˚
that range from 2.3843(8) to 2.4043(8) A [7]. The
˚
respective Ru-Cl lengths of 2.412(1) and 2.435(1) A
are comparable to the Ru–Cl lengths of 2.436(2)
˚
and 2.444(2) A in [RuCl2(CO)2(TePh2)2] [2] and ex-
Fig. 2. The weak hydrogen bonding network in [RuCl -
(CO)2(SPh2)2] (1).
2
pectedly slightly longer than those of 2.3388(8)–
˚
2.3497(8) A in [RuCl3(SMe2)3] that contains the
Brought to you by | Tufts University
Authenticated
Download Date | 7/10/18 10:19 AM

962
M. Taimisto et al. · Formation and Structural Characterization of [RuCl2(CO)2(SPh2)2]
Fig. 5. The molecular structure of [Ru(OH2)6][RuCl3-
(CO)3]2·2H2O (3) indicating the numbering of the atoms.
Fig. 3. The molecular structure of [RuCl2(CO)3(OH2)] (2)
indicating the numbering of the atoms. The thermal ellip-
soids have been drawn at 50% probability.
The thermal ellipsoids have been drawn at 50% probability.
Fig. 6. The hydrogen bonding network in [Ru(OH2)6]
[RuCl3(CO)3]2·2H2O (3).
drogen bonding network that also binds the adjacent
stacks together (see Fig. 2). The shortest intermolecu-
˚
lar distances are 2.864– 2.994 A.
Fig. 4. Four hydrogen bonds in [RuCl2(CO)3(OH2)] (2)
connect the complexes into dimeric units.
As shown in Fig. 3, the structure of [RuCl2(CO)3-
(OH2)] (2) also consists of discrete complexes with
the ruthenium atom showing slightly distorted octahe-
dral coordination [the range of the cis-bond angles is
87.49(7)– 92.47(13)◦]. The three carbonyl groups are
arranged facially, the octahedron being completed by
ruthenium atom in a higher positive oxidation state [7].
The Ru-C bond lengths of 1.877(5) and 1.883(5) A
˚
in 1 are also comparable to those of 1.871(7) and
˚
1.849(8) A in [RuCl2(CO)2(TePh2)2] [2].
The [RuCl2(CO)2(SPh2)2] complexes are packed two cis-chlorido and one aqua ligand. The Ru-Cl dis-
˚
into stacks by a weak three-dimensional H···Cl hy- tances are 2.401(1) and 2.408(1) A, the Ru-C bond
Brought to you by | Tufts University
Authenticated
Download Date | 7/10/18 10:19 AM

M. Taimisto et al. · Formation and Structural Characterization of [RuCl2(CO)2(SPh2)2]
963
˚
lengths span a range of 1.885(3)– 1.927(4) A, and the
The cations and anions of 3 are connected into a
˚
Ru-O bond length is 2.148(2) A. In addition to the cor- three-dimensional network by hydrogen bonding, as
responding bond lengths in 1, these values can be com- shown in Fig. 6. The water of crystallization is in-
pared to those observed for [RuCl2(CO)3(OH2)] in a volved in four hydrogen bonds. There are two short
˚
diglyme adduct [8], which shows Ru-OH2, Ru-C, and oxygen-hydrogen distances of 1.880 and 1.957 A
˚
Ru-Cl bond lengths of 2.105(4), 1.889(5)– 1.905(5) A, [H(11B)···O(1) and H(13B)···O(1), respectively; the
and 2.395(3) A, respectively. Both in 2 and in the respective O-H···O angles are 176.4 and 161.8◦]
˚
diglyme complex the Ru-C bond trans to the aqua lig- and two hydrogen-chlorine contacts of 2.350 and
˚
and is shorter than the Ru-C bonds trans to the chlorido 2.578 A [H(1A)···Cl(22) and H(1B)···Cl(21), respec-
ligands.
tively; the two respective O-H···Cl angles are 175.9
and 145.6◦]. The coordinated water molecules of the
cation also form weak hydrogen bonds with the chlo-
rido ligands of the anion.
The complexes of 2 are packed together in pairs by
four H···Cl hydrogen bonds (see Fig. 4) that span a
˚
range of 2.326– 2.399 A. In the case of the diglyme
The reaction of [RuCl2(CO)3]2 and SPh2 in
THF affords [RuCl2(CO)2(SPh2)2] (1) in mod-
erate yield [3]. The stirring of [RuCl2(CO)3]2
and SPh2 in CH2Cl2 at room temperature pro-
duces a mixture of [RuCl2(CO)3(OH2)] (2) and
[Ru(H2O)6][RuCl3(CO)3]2·2H2O (3). A small amount
of [RuCl2(CO)2(SPh2)2] is obtained upon prolonged
reflux of the reagents.
adduct, diglyme acts as a hydrogen-bond acceptor for
the coordinated water molecule [8]. The distance be-
tween the oxygen atoms of water molecules and the
˚
oxygen atoms of the diglyme molecules is 2.71 A.
The molecular structure of 3 is shown in Fig. 5
together with the atomic numbering scheme, and the
selected bond distances and angles are listed in Ta-
ble 2. 3 is composed of [Ru(OH2)6]2+ cations and
[RuCl3(CO)3]− anions. Ruthenium shows octahedral
coordination in both ions. The Ru-O bonds in the
The formation of 2 and 3 in CH2Cl2 in air may be
formulated as follows:
˚
H2O
cation show lengths of 2.070(6)– 2.118(6) A and can
2[RuCl2(CO)3]2 −−→ [RuCl2(CO)3(OH2)]
be compared to the Ru-O bonds in hexaaquaruthe-
+[Ru(OH2)6][RuCl3(CO)3]2 +3CO
nium(II) p-toluenesulfonate that exhibit an average
˚
length of 2.122 A [9]. The carbonyl and chlorido lig-
Upon reflux, the aqua ligand in 2 is substituted by
SPh2. [RuCl2(CO)2(SPh2)2] (1) is obtained by the sub-
sequent substitution of CO by a second SPh2 molecule.
The very small yield may be explained by the forma-
tion of [Ru(OH2)6][RuCl3(CO)3]2 that removes ruthe-
nium from further reaction.
ands in the [RuCl3(CO)3]− anion are in the facial con-
figuration. The Ru-Cl distances range from 2.410(2) to
˚
2.426(2) A. They are near to the Ru-Cl bond lengths
in 1 and 2 and are also comparable to the corre-
sponding bonds in (H5O2)[RuCl3(CO)3]·SbCl3 (av-
˚
erage 2.419 A) [10], (S5N5)[RuCl3(CO)3] (average
˚
Acknowledgments
2.412 A) [11], and [Ru(CO)3(η-C5H5)][RuCl3(CO)3]
˚
(average 2.404 A) [12]. The Ru-C bond lengths also
Financial support from Academy of Finland and Finnish
Cultural Foundation (Lapland Foundation) is gratefully ac-
knowledged.
˚
show typical values ranging 1.879(9)– 1.914(9) A (c.f.
the corresponding bond lengths in 1 and 2).
[1] W. Hieber, P. John, Chem. Ber. 103, 2161 (1970).
[2] R. Oilunkaniemi, R. S. Laitinen, M. Ahlgre´n, Inorg.
Chem. Commun. 3, 8 (2000).
[5] G. M. Sheldrick, SHELXS-97, Program for Crys-
tal Structure Determination, University of Go¨ttingen
(1997).
[3] M. Ahlgre´n, M. S. Hannu-Kuure, J. Komulainen, R.
S. Laitinen, R. Oilunkaniemi, T. A. Pakkanen, R. J.
Suontamo, M. Taimisto, International Conference on
Coordination Chemistry, Heidelberg, July 21 – 26, Ab-
stracts, p. 600 (2002).
[6] G. M. Sheldrick, SHELXL-97, Program for Crystal
Structure Refinement, University of Go¨ttingen (1997).
[7] J. S. Jaswal, S. J. Rettig, B. R. James, Can. J. Chem.
68, 1808 (1990).
[8] J. J. Bergmeister, B. E. Hanson, J. S. Merola, Inorg.
Chem. 29, 4831 (1990).
[4] G. M. Gray, C. H. Duffey, Acta Crystallogr. C52, 861
(1996).
Brought to you by | Tufts University
Authenticated
Download Date | 7/10/18 10:19 AM

964
M. Taimisto et al. · Formation and Structural Characterization of [RuCl2(CO)2(SPh2)2]
[9] P. Bernhard, H.-B. Burgi, J. Hauser, H. Lehmann,
A. Ludi, Inorg. Chem. 21, 3936 (1982).
[11] A. Berg, K. Dehnicke, D. Fenske, Z. Anorg. Allg.
Chem. 527, 111 (1985).
[10] P. Teulon, J. Roziere, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 483, 219
[12] C. S. Griffith, G. A. Koutsantonis, C. L. Raston, J. P.
Selegue, B. W. Skelton, A. H. White, J. Organomet.
Chem. 518, 197 (1996).
(1981).
Brought to you by | Tufts University
Authenticated
Download Date | 7/10/18 10:19 AM