Therefore, novel hydrazines 7 and 8 were synthesized from the
corresponding diketones by oxazaborolidine-catalysed reduction,8
mesylation, and reaction with hydrazine. Their condensation with
glyoxal readily afforded the desired ligands 9 and 10 (Scheme 4),
and their Cu(OTf)2 1 : 1 complexes were used as the catalysts in the
chosen model reaction.
In both cases, cycloadduct 6 was formed with a significant
increase of enantioselectivities, thereby validating the suitability of
the strategy. As the highest induction was observed for ligand 9,
this result was further optimized to afford cycloadduct 6 in 90%
yield as a 98 : 2 endo : exo mixture and with 95% ee [(R,R)-endo)]
(Table 1, entry 1). These conditions were then applied to the
cycloaddition of 1 to other conjugated dienes such as cyclohex-
adiene 11, isoprene 12, 2,3-dimethyl-1,3-butadiene 13, and furan
14, affording high yields of the corresponding cycloadducts 15–18,
with good enantioselectivities in all cases (entries 2–5). Note-
worthy is that adducts 15 and 16 were obtained with complete
diastereo- and regioselectivity, respectively (entries 4 and 5). The
synthesis of ent-9 and its use in the model cycloaddition afforded
ent-6, thereby highlighting the availability of the desired enantio-
mer for each cycloadduct.
Scheme 4 Synthesis of ligands 9 and 10.
In conclusion, the inclusion of C2-symmetric dialkylamino
substructures in glyoxal bis-hydrazones is the key design element
resulting in the successful application of these compounds as novel
N-ligands for the enantioselective copper(II)-catalyzed Diels–Alder
cycloaddition. Both enantiomers of the required ligand are easily
available on a multigram scale in only three steps from 1,4-diph-
enylbutanedione. It is hoped that this new class of synthetic
nitrogen ligands will find applications in other catalytic organic
reactions.
At this point, it is worth mentioning that, even though the results
collected for the cyclic dienes 2 and 11 are similar to those obtained
with many other catalysts,9 the yields and selectivities achieved in
the cycloadditions to the more flexible dienes 12 and 13 appear as
a more interesting result, matching or exceeding those reported to
date.9b,c,10
We thank the DGICYT (grants PB 97/0747 and PPQ 2000-1341)
and the European Community (HPRN-CT-2001-00172), and the
Junta de Andalucía for financial support. M.A. thanks the
Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia for a predoctoral fellowship.
Table 1 Enantioselective Diels–Alder cycloadditions
Yield
Entry Diene L
T/°C (%)a Product
Confb dec eed
Notes and references
1 (a) F. Fache, E. Schulz, M. L. Tommasino and M. Lemaire, Chem. Rev.,
2000, 100, 2159; (b) A. Togni and L. M. Venanzi, Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. Engl., 1994, 33, 497.
1
2
9
9
260 90
R,R
R,R
96 95
2 Nucleophilic reactivity: (a) R. Fernández and J. M. Lassaletta, Synlett,
2000, 1228; (b) R. Fernández, E. Martín-Zamora, C. Pareja and J. M.
Lassaletta, J. Org. Chem., 2001, 66, 5201; (c) J. Vázquez, A. Prieto, R.
Fernández, D. Enders and J. M. Lassaletta, Chem. Commun., 2002, 498;
. Imine-like reactivity: (d) R. Fernández, A. Ferrete, J. M. Lassaletta, J.
M. Llera and A. Monge, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2000, 39, 2893; (e) R.
Fernández, A. Ferrete, J. M. Lassaletta, J. M. Llera and E. Martín-
Zamora, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2002, 41, 832.
225 83
> 99 84
3 D. Enders, H. Kipphardt, P. Gerdes, L. J. Breña-Valle and V. Buhshan,
Bull. Soc. Chim. Belg., 1988, 97, 691.
4 (a) A. Defoin, A. Brouillard-Poichet and J. Streith, Helv. Chim. Acta,
1991, 74, 103; (b) D. Enders and J. Wiedeman, Synthesis, 1996,
1443.
5 (a) D. Enders, R. Maaßen and J. Runsink, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry,
1998, 2155 and references cited therein (b) Y. Yamamoto, Y. Hoshino,
Y. Fujimoto and J. Ohmoto, Synthesis, 1993, 298.
3
4
9
9
235 79d
235 89
R
R
—
—
92
92
6 (a) T. Mino, M. Shiotsuki, N. Yamamoto, T. Suenaga, M. Sakamoto, T.
Fujita and M. Yamashita, J. Org. Chem., 2001, 66, 1795; (b) T. Mino,
T. Ogawa and M. Yamashita, J. Organomet. Chem., 2003, 665, 122; (c)
D. Enders, R. Peters, R. Lochtman and J. Runsink, Eur. J. Org. Chem.,
2000, 2839.
7 (a) H. B. Kagan and O. Riant, Chem. Rev., 1992, 92, 1007; (b) E. J.
Corey, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2002, 41, 1650.
8 D. J. Aldous, W. M. Dutton and P. G. Steel, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry,
2000, 11, 2455.
9 Selected recent examples: (a) D. A. Evans, S. J. Miller, T. Lectka and P.
von Matt, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1999, 121, 7559; (b) D. A. Evans, D. M.
Barnes, J. S. Johnson, T. Lectka, P. von Matt, S. J. Miller, J. A. Murry,
R. D. Norcross, E. A. Shaughnessy and K. R. Campos, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 1999, 121, 7559; (c) S. Kanemasa, Y. Oderaotoshi, S.-i.
Sakaguchi, H. Yamamoto, J. Tanaka, E. Wada and D. P. Curran, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 1998, 120, 3074; (d) T. D. Owens, F. J. Hollander, A. G.
Oliver and J. A. Ellman, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2001, 123, 1539.
10 S. Kobayashi, M. Araki and I. Hachiya, J. Org. Chem., 1994, 59,
3758.
5
6
9
250 88
R,R
74 96
2
ent-9 260 91
S,S
96 95
a Isolated yield. b Of major isomer. c Determined by HPLC in chiral
stationary phases. d A single regioisomer was detected by NMR and
HPLC.
C h e m . C o m m u n . , 2 0 0 4 , 2 9 8 – 2 9 9
299