C. Arisandy et al. / Journal of Organometallic Chemistry 689 (2004) 775–780
777
remaining solid was washed with diethyl ether (3 ꢁ 10
ml) and then extracted into dry CH2Cl2 (20 ml). After
filtration through a bed of Celite, the solution was then
layered with dry pentane (100 ml), resulting in the slow
precipitation of a green solid (27 mg, 0.12 mmol, 70%).
aqueous saturated NaCl (1 ꢁ 20 ml), dried over MgSO4,
and evaporated under reduced pressure. The product
was purified by crystallization from hexane to give a
yellow solid in 15–25% yield. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300
MHz) d 7.75 (d, J ¼ 8:0 Hz, 2H, Ph o-HCH), 7.00–7.30
(m, overlapping peaks, 3H, Ph m- and p-H), 6.50 (m,
2H, 2 ꢁ CH@), 4.50 (t, J ¼ 1:8 Hz, 1H, C5H4CH), 4.46
(t, J ¼ 1:8 Hz, 1H, C5H4CH), 4.42 (t, J ¼ 1:8 Hz, 1H,
C5H4CH), 4.35 (t, J ¼ 1:8 Hz, 2H, C5H4 CH), 4.20 (t,
J ¼ 1:8 Hz, 2H, C5H4CH), 4.02 (t, J ¼ 1:8 Hz, 1H,
C5H4 CH), 2.64 (d, J ¼ 3:8 Hz, 1H, CHPh). 13C NMR
(CDCl3, 75 MHz) d 129.6 (Ph or CH@), 129.0 (Ph or
CH@), 128.5 (Ph or CH@), 127.0 (Ph or CH@), 126.8
(Ph or CH@), 126.0 (Ph or CH@), 71.2 (C5H4), 70.5
(C5H4), 70.3 (C5H4), 70.1 (C5H4), 69.8 (C5H4), 69.2
(C5H4), 68.0 (C5H4), 26.0 (CHPh) (some overlap of Cp
ES-MS: m/z 224 ([3a]þ). UV–Vis (CH2Cl2): kmax (ꢀmax
)
613 nm (833 Mꢀ1 cmꢀ1). Analysis (%): Found (Calcu-
lated); C, 33.91 (33.96); H, 2.57 (2.64); Fe, 12.61 (12.15).
2.5. 1,10 -[1-(p-Toluenesulfonyl)hydrazono-3-phenyl-pro-
pane-1,3-diyl]-ferrocene (2b)
To a solution of the corresponding ketone, 1b [25] (80
mg, 0.25 mmol) in ethanol (10 ml) was added dropwise
p-toluene sulphonyl hydrazide (46 mg, 0.25 mmol) in
acetic acid (0.5 ml). This mixture was heated to reflux
for 2 h and then cooled to room temperature. Volatiles
were removed under reduced pressure and the product
was dissolved in CH2Cl2 (10 ml). This solution was
washed with saturated aqueous NaHCO3 (3 ꢁ 15 ml)
and then dried over MgSO4. Finally the volatiles were
removed under reduced pressure to afford a yellow–or-
ange crystalline material (96.9 mg, 0.20 mmol, 80%). 1H
NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz) d 7.75 (t, J ¼ 8:0 Hz, 2H, Ph
m-CH ), 7.06–7.24 (m, 7H, overlapping peaks, Ph o- and
p-CH and tolyl CH), 4.42 (t, J ¼ 1:8Hz, 1H, C5H4CH),
4.40 (t, J ¼ 1:8 Hz, 1H, C5H4CH), 4.38 (t, J ¼ 1:8 Hz,
2H, C5H4CH), 4.05 (t, J ¼ 1:8 Hz, 2H, C5H4 CH), 4.25
(t, J ¼ 1:8 Hz, 1H, C5H4CH), 3.95 (t, J ¼ 1:8 Hz, 1H,
C5H4CH), 3.63 (dd, J ¼ 2:3Hz, 12.9 Hz, 1H, CHPh),
3.28 (apparent t, J ¼ 12:9 Hz, 1H, CH2 [H cis to
CHPh]), 2.95 (dd, J ¼ 2:3 Hz, 12.9 Hz, 1H, CH2 [H
trans to CHPh]), 2.45 (s, 3H, CH3). 13C NMR (CDCl3,
75 MHz) d 155.9 (C@N), 143.7 (Ar quat.), 143.1 (Ar
quat.), 135.0 (Ar quat.), 129.3 (ArCH), 128.2 (ArCH),
127.7 (ArCH), 126.7 (ArCH), 126.3 (ArCH), 89.9 (C5H4
quat.), 72.5 (C5H4CH), 71.7 (C5H4 quat.), 71.2 (C5H4
2 ꢁ overlapping CH), 71.0 (C5H4CH), 70.9 (C5H4CH),
68.5 (C5H4CH), 68.3 (C5H4CH), 67.6 (C5H4CH), 49.6
(CHPh), 45.5 (CH2), 21.8 (C H3). UV–Vis (EtOH) kmax
(ꢀmax) 442 nm (515 Mꢀ1 cmꢀ1). ES-MS: m/z 484 (Mþ,
20%), 300 (100%, Mþ–NNHTs). Analysis (%): Found
(Calculated); C, 64.14 (64.47); H, 5.04 (4.99); N, 5.74
(5.78); Fe,11.53 (11.45).
13C resonances is assumed). UV–Vis (EtOH) kmax (ꢀmax
)
444 nm (255 Mꢀ1 cmꢀ1). Analysis (%): Found (Calcu-
lated); C, 75.39 (76.02); H, 5.37 (5.62).
2.7. Polymerization experiments
In a nitrogen-filled Vacuum Atmospheres glove-box,
3a (25 mg, 0.11 mmol) was loaded into an NMR tube
and dissolved in dry benzene-d6 (0.5 ml). A solution of
ROMP initiator [Ru] or [Mo] (1/10, 1/20 or 1/50 equiv-
alent) in dry benzene-d6 (0.5 ml) was added rapidly to
the solution and shaken. The yellow solution was then
heated (up to 60 °C for [Ru]; up to 40 °C for [Mo]) and
the progress of the reaction was monitored by 1H NMR
spectroscopy.
In the case of a [Mo]-initiated reaction heated for 40
°C, the reaction was quenched after 3 days by addition
of excess benzaldehyde. Volatiles were removed under
reduced pressure to give a yellow solid. Soluble material
4a was extracted into THF (3 ꢁ 1 ml) and evaporated
under reduced pressure to give an orange solid in ca.
60% yield. ES-MS m/z 896 (1%, [3a]þ4 ), 672 (5%, [3a]3þ),
594 (1%), 532 (1%), 448 (90%, [3a]þ2 ), 429 (1%), 370
(1%), 266 (100%), 224 (45%, [3a]þ), 178 (20%). EI-MS
1120 (3%, [3a]þ5 ), 896 (100%, [3a]þ4 ), 887 (10%), 672
(64%, [3a]þ3 ), 448 (36%, [3a]þ2 ), 342 (48%), 224 (93%,
[3a]þ), 121 (36%). Analysis (%): Found (Calculated for
[3a]n); C, 68.98 (69.68); H, 5.38 (5.40).
2.6. 1,10 -(3-Phenyl-1-propene-1,3-diyl)-ferrocene (3b)
3. Results and discussion
A solution of 2b (0.15 g, 0.5 mmol) in dry THF (10
ml) was heated to 60 °C. To this solution was added
dropwise a solution of lithium di-iso-propylamide (0.2 g,
1.8 mmol) in dry THF (5 ml). The reaction was stirred at
reflux temperature for 4 h and then cooled to room
temperature. Volatiles were removed under reduced
pressure and the remaining solid was extracted with
diethyl ether (3 ꢁ 20 ml). The combined ether extracts
were washed with water (2 ꢁ 25 ml) and then with
1,10 -(1-Propene-1,3-diyl)-ferrocene, 3a, has previously
been synthesized by several methods. Subjecting the tosyl
hydrazone of b-oxo-[3](1,10 )ferrocenophane to Bamford–
Stevens conditions affords 3a in 70% yield [26]. The
corresponding reaction with the tosyl hydrazone of
a-oxo-[3](1,10 )ferrocenophane, 2a, is considerably less
efficient, with a reported yield of 22% [24]. However, a-
oxo-[3](1,10 )ferrocenophane, 1a, can be obtained readily