for 10 min, the enolate 7a was generated and the desired
aza-Claisen rearrangement9a took place, leading to the
formation of (-)-azacyclodec-5-en-2-one 6 {white solid, mp
148-149 °C, [R]D -48.8 (c 1.0, CHCl3)} in a yield of
75% (Scheme 5). Since we had predicted that the aza-Claisen
synthetic isohaliclorensin (3) as R, which further confirmed
the 2R,2′R stereochemistry assigned for 2-phenyl-2-(2-vinyl-
piperidin-1-yl)-ethanol (11a) (vide supra).
Next, we turned our attention to the asymmetric synthesis
of haliclorensin (1). Chemoselective reduction of the nitrile
group of 4 (H2, PtO2, Norit, H2SO4, 96 h)18 under acidic
conditions provided the desired amido-amine 16 in 87% yield
(Scheme 7). Treatment of 16 with 0.95 molar equiv of
20
Scheme 5
Scheme 7
rearrangement would proceed via the conformer 7a,9a this
would establish an (R)-configuration in 6. The (R)-stereo-
chemistry was confirmed by our synthesis of both (R)-
isohaliclorensin (3) and (R)-haliclorensin (1) (vide infra).
Saturation of olefinic double bond in 6 (H2, 10%Pd/C,
MeOH) furnished (+)-azacyclodecan-2-one 5 {white solid,
mp 152-154 °C, [R]20D +20.3 (c 1.0, CHCl3)} in quantitative
yield.
LHMDS in toluene at reflux led to the desired ring-
expanded19 product 1720 {mp 129-130 °C, [R]20 -5.6 (c
D
0.8, CHCl3)} as a white solid in 43% yield (77% based on
Treatment of lactam 5 with a catalytic amount of n-
butyllithium at -78 °C followed by addition of acrylonitrile
led to the addition product 4 {[R]20D -59.2 (c 1.05, CHCl3);
yield 65%} along with recovered starting material 5 (33%)
(Scheme 6). Finally, reduction of both the amide carbonyl
recovered starting material).
The final transformation of 17 to haliclorensin (1) turned
out to be problematic. Attempts to reduce 17 with lithium
aluminum hydride led to complex mixtures of products, with
the desired product 1 only being isolated in low yield. Finally,
it was found that the reduction of amide 17 with borane
generated in situ from a NaBH4-I2 system21 (THF, reflux,
16 h) provided the desired (R)-haliclorensin (R-1) {[R]20
D
Scheme 6
19.4 (c 0.8, MeOH); lit.1 [R]D -2.2 (c 1.3, MeOH) for natural
1; lit.3b [R]D -18.5 (c 0.6, MeOH) for (S)-1; lit.3b [R]20D 20
(c 2.0, MeOH) for (R)-1} in 75% yield.
Since the natural haliclorensin (1) was shown to consist
of (R)- and (S)-enantiomers in a 1:3 ratio, with the (S)-
enantiomer being predominant,3b we decided to pursue the
synthesis of the (S)-enantiomers of haliclorensin (1) and
isohaliclorensin 3. Toward this end, Katritzky’s method12 was
adopted for the synthesis of 11b. Thus, treatment of 9 with
1.0 molar equiv of vinylmagnesium bromide at -78 °C,
followed by reduction of crude 18 with NaBH4 provided 11b
as the major diastereomer (dr ) 89:11, overall yield, 54%)
and the cyano groups of 4 with an excess of borane dimethyl
sulfide complex at 60 °C for 15 h provided isohaliclorensin
(3) in 55% yield. Comparing the specific optical rotation of
(18) Kramer, U.; Guggisberg, A.; Hesse, M.; Schmid, H. HelV Chim.
Acta 1978, 61, 1342.
(19) For some other transamidation reactions, see: (a) Wasserman, H.
H.; Berger, G. D.; Cho, K. R. Tetrahedron Lett. 1982, 23, 465. (b) Crombie,
L.; Jones, R. C. F.; Osborne, S.; Mat-Zin, A. R. J. Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun. 1983, 959. (c) Bienz, S.; Guggisberg, A.; Walchli, R.; Hesse, M.
HelV. Chim. Acta 1979, 62, 1932. (d) Crombie, L.; Jones, R. C. F.; Haigh,
D. Tetrahedron Lett. 1986, 27, 5147. (e) Crombie, L.; Jones, R. C. F.; Haigh,
D. Tetrahedron Lett. 1986, 27, 5151. (f) Wasserman, H. H.; Robinson, R.
P.; Matsuyama, H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1980, 21, 3493. (g) Manhas, M. S.;
Amin, S. G.; Bose, A. K. Heterocycles 1976, 5, 669.
(20) Attempts to determine the enantiomeric excess of 17 by HPLC with
several types of chiral columns were unsuccessful.
(21) Bhanu Prasad, A. S.; Bhaskar Kanth, J. V.; Periasamy, M.
Tetrahedron 1992, 48, 4623.
our synthetic isohaliclorensin (3) {[R]20 +70 (c 0.6,
D
MeOH)} with the reported values {lit.3a [R]D -70 (c 0.9,
MeOH) for (S)-3; lit.7 [R]20D +74.6 (c 0.9, MeOH) for (R)-
3} allowed us to confirm the absolute configuration of our
(16) (a) Munchhof, M. J.; Meyers, A. I. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 7084.
(b) Andres, J. M.; Herraiz-Sierra, I.; Pedrosa, R.; Perez-Encabo, A. Eur. J.
Org. Chem. 2000, 1719. (c) For a related method, see: Guerrier, L.; Royer,
J.; Grierson, D. S.; Husson, H.-P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1983, 105, 7754.
(17) Agami, C.; Couty, F.; Evano, G. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 3709.
Org. Lett., Vol. 6, No. 7, 2004
1141