892
F. Lazzaro et al. / Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 15 (2004) 889–893
0.945 mmol) was added dropwise. The mixture was
allowed to warm to 0 ꢁC and stirred for 2 h. After
evaporation of the solvent, the crude was diluted
with water and diethyl ether and, after separation, the
organic layer extracted with a (15%) aqueous solution of
HCl. After evaporation of the collected aqueous layers,
the residue was loaded onto a Dowex 50 W-X8 column,
affording 90 mg of (S)-5 (83%).
4.6. X-ray diffraction of (2R,RS)-4b
A suitable crystal (block, colourless, 0.6 · 0.5 · 0.2 mm
in dimension) was obtained from i-Pr2O. Intensity data
were collected on a Siemens P4 diffractometer with
graphite monochromated Cu-Ka radiation (k ¼
1:54179 Aꢁ), using h=2h scan technique. Unit cell para-
meters were determined using 60 reflections in the range
10 6 2h 6 54ꢁ; a total of 2688 reflections were collected
up to 136ꢁ in 2h and index range: ꢀ1 6 h P 23,
ꢀ10 6 k P 1, ꢀ13 6 l P 1. No crystal decay was
observed. Crystal data: C18H24O5NF3S, Mr ¼ 423:4,
20
(S)-5: Mp ¼ 155 ꢁC (dec). ½aꢁ ¼ þ22:4 (c ¼ 0:52, H2O).
1H NMR (D2O): 4.16 (q, JD¼ 7:1 Hz, 2H), 2.78 (ABq,
J ¼ 16:7 Hz and Dm ¼ 96 Hz, 2H), 1.14 (t, J ¼ 7:1 Hz,
3H). 13C NMR (D2O): 178.0, 172.8, 126.6 (q,
J ¼ 284:2 Hz), 66.7, 65.7 (q, J ¼ 27:2 Hz), 41.8, 15.8. 19F
NMR (D2O): )75.02 (s). HRMS calcd for C7H10F3NO4
(MHþ) 230.0640, found 230.0635.
orthorhombic, space group P212121, a ¼ 19:319ð2Þ,
3
ꢁ
ꢁ
b ¼ 9:965ð1Þ, c ¼ 10:919ð1Þ A, V ¼ 2102:1ð1Þ A , Z ¼ 4,
Dc ¼ 1:338 g cmꢀ3, l ¼ 1:863 mmꢀ1, F ð000Þ ¼ 888; k ¼
ꢁ
1:54179 A, room temperature. The structure was solved
by direct methods using an SIR9711 program, which
revealed the position of all nonH atoms; H atoms were
located at calculated positions and refined in a riding
model. The refinement was carried out on F2 by full-
matrix least-squares procedure with SHELXL9712 for 257
parameters, with anisotropic temperature factors for
nonH atoms. The final stage converged to R ¼ 0:053
(Rw ¼ 0:124) for 2023 observed reflections, with
I P 2rðIÞ, and R ¼ 0:068 (Rw ¼ 0:137) for all unique
reflections after merging. The mean shift/error was 0.003
and the goodness of fit, S, was 1.097. The final difference
map showed a maximum and minimum residual peaks
20
Enantiomeric (R)-5 showed ½aꢁ ¼ ꢀ21:1 (c ¼ 0:53,
D
H2O).
4.4. Synthesis of a-trifluoromethyl aspartic acid hydro-
chloride (S)-6
To a solution containing (S)-5 (60 mg, 0.24 mmol) dis-
solved in 5 mL of a 70:30 methanol/water mixture, 3 mL
of a 0.5 M aqueous solution of KOH was added drop-
wise and the resulting mixture stirred overnight at rt.
The reaction solution was acidified to pH ¼ 1 by slowly
adding an aqueous solution of HCl (1 M), and the sol-
vent then evaporated. The residue was dissolved in
water, and loaded onto an IRA-410 column. Elution with
1 M HCl afforded 41mg (72%) of hydrochloride (S)-6.
of 0.26 and )0.24 e Aꢀ3, respectively. The absolute
ꢁ
configuration was assigned by the Flack13 parameter
x ¼ ꢀ0:05ð4Þ for the (R) absolute configuration and
x ¼ 0:96ð4Þ for the inverse one, and by an R-factor test
R ¼ 0:053 and R ¼ 0:059 for the (R) and (S) configura-
tions, respectively.
20
(S)-6: Mp ¼ 185 ꢁC (dec). ½aꢁ ¼ þ23:5 (c ¼ 0:25, H2O).
D
1H NMR (D2O): 3.10 (ABq, J ¼ 18 Hz and Dm ¼ 68 Hz,
2H). 13C NMR (D2O): 174.5, 168.8, 125.5 (q,
J ¼ 284:2 Hz), 65.6 (q, J ¼ 28:4 Hz), 37.0. 19F NMR
(D2O): )73.76 (s). HRMS calcd for C7H10F3NO4
(MHþ) 230.0640, found 230.0638.
Acknowledgements
We thank MIUR (Cofin 2002, Project ÔPeptidi Sintetici
BioattiviÕ), Politecnico di Milano and CNR for
economic support.
20
Enantiomeric (R)-6 showed ½aꢁ ¼ ꢀ24:3 (c ¼ 0:25,
D
H2O).
References and notes
4.5. Synthesis of a-trifluoromethyl aspartic acid (S)-7
1. (a) Fluorine-containing Amino Acids: Synthesis and Prop-
erties; Kukhar, V. P., Soloshonok, V. A., Eds.; Wiley:
Chichester, 1995; (b) Sutherland, A.; Willis, C. L. Nat.
Prod. Rep. 2000, 621–631.
2. Banks, R. E.; Tatlow, J. C.; Smart, B. E. Organofluorine
Chemistry: Principles and Commercial Applications; Ple-
num Press: New York, 1994.
3. (a) Dal Pozzo, A.; Muzi, L.; Moroni, M.; Rondanin, R.;
de Castiglione, R.; Bravo, P.; Zanda, M. Tetrahedron
1998, 54, 6019–6028; (b) Dal Pozzo, A.; Dikovskaya, K.;
Moroni, M.; Fagnoni, M.; Vanini, L.; Bergonzi, R.; de
Castiglione, R.; Bravo, P.; Zanda, M. J. Chem. Res. 1999,
468–469.
4. (a) Soloshonok, V. A.; Gerus, I. I.; YagupolÕskii, Yu. L.;
KukharÕ, V. P. J. Org. Chem. USSR (Engl. Transl.) 1987,
23, 2034–2038; (b) Kobzev, S. P.; Soloshonok, V. A.;
Galushko, S. V.; YagupolÕskii, Yu. L.; KukharÕ, V. P.
J. Gen. Chem. USSR (Engl. Transl.) 1989, 59, 801–803;
Working under the same experimental conditions as
described above and after the end of reaction, the crude
solution was acidified to pH ¼ 1 by adding an aqueous
solution of HCl (1 M) and then evaporated. The residue
was dissolved in water and loaded onto a Dowex 50 W-
X8 column, affording 26 mg of free aminoacid (S)-7
(54% yield) upon elution with a 7.5% aqueous ammonia
solution.
20
(S)-7: Oil. ½aꢁ ¼ þ23:5 (c ¼ 0:17, H2O). 1H NMR
D
(D2O): 2.70 (ABq, J ¼ 16:7 Hz and Dm ¼ 65 Hz, 2H).
13C NMR (D2O): 178.5, 172.9, 126.8 (q, J ¼ 283:7 Hz),
20
66.0 (q, J ¼ 26:6 Hz), 40.1. 19F NMR (D2O): )74.00 (s).
Enantiomeric (R)-7 showed ½aꢁ ¼ ꢀ18:4 (c ¼ 0:19,
D
H2O). HRMS calcd for C5H6F3NO4 (MHþ) 202.0327,
found: 202.0319.