998
C. N. S. S. P. Kumar, C. Srinivas, P. S. Sadhu, V. J. Rao, and S. Palaniappan
Vol 46
Scheme 1
solvent was evaporated by reduced pressure. The crude prod-
ucts were subjected to column chromatography (silica gel 5%
EtOAc in hexane) to afford the pure products. All products
were characterized by 1H NMR, mass spectral data and com-
pared with the reported spectral and physical data for known
compounds (entry numbers 1–9, 11–13).
The recovered catalyst (Amberlyst-15) was reused (after
treatment with HCl) four more times for the condensation
reaction between benzaldehyde and b-naphthol following the
above procedure for 2 h in each case the corresponding prod-
uct furnishes with an yield of 93, 92, 92, and 91%.
for various aldehydes with b-naphthol and the yields are
reported in Table 1.The products were obtained within 2
to 4 h in excellent yields and generally, both catalysts
provided almost the same yield (Table 1).
Selected analytical data of three new representative diben-
zoxanthenes are given below.
We observed that the reactivity of aromatic aldehydes
with b-naphthol is higher when compared with the ali-
phatic aldehydes in terms of yields and reaction time
(Table 1). Furfural undergoes condensation smoothly
with b-naphthol in 2.5 h with good yield (entry no. 15,
Table 1). 4-Dimethylaminobenzaldehyde and pyridine-4-
carbaldehyde did not react to give dibenzoxanthenes and
it may be due to the presence of basic nitrogen in the
system (Table 1). Amberlyst-15 can be recovered by
simple filtration and can be reused after activation by
treatment with HCl.
14-(3,4-dimethoxyphenyl)-14H-ibenzo[a,j]xanthene (entry
10). Wheatish solid; mp 186–188ꢁC. IR (KBr): 3065, 1681,
1
1590, 1269, 1239, 1135, 1019, 815, 746 cmꢂ1. H NMR (300
MHz, CDCl3): d ¼ 8.35 (d, 2H), 7.35–7.81 (m, 10H), 7.08
(dd, 1H), 6.83 (d, 1H), 6.62 (d, 1H), 6.4 (s, 1H), 3.68 (s, 3H),
3.64 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): d 154.36, 148.95,
148.6,147.45, 137.58, 131.32, 130.98, 128.68, 128.64, 126.64,
126.56, 124.10, 122.6, 122.25, 117.78, 117.30, 111.68, 110.77,
55.85, 55.51, 37.29; HRMS (ESI) Calcd for C29H23O3 [Mþ
H]þ 419.1647, found 419.1633; Anal. Calcd for C29H23O3: C,
83.23; H, 5.30; Found: C, 83.17; H, 5.38.
14-Heptyl-14H-dibenzo[a,j]xanthene (entry 14). Off-white
solid; mp 74–76ꢁC. IR (KBr): 2922, 2850, 1589, 1458, 1397,
In conclusion, we have described a simple, clean, effi-
cient, and environmental friendly method for the synthe-
sis of biologically active heterocyclic compound, diben-
zoxanthenes using two different inexpensive and nonha-
zardous catalysts NaHSO4ꢀSiO2 and Amberlyst-15. We
feel that this method is a valid contribution to the exist-
ing methodologies.
1
1241, 810, 741 cmꢂ1. H NMR (300 MHZ, CDCl3): d ¼ 8.25
(d, 2H), 7.9 (d, 2H), 7.75 (d, 2H), 7.6 (t, 2H), 7.42 (t, 2H), 7.3
(d, 2H), 5.55 (s, 1H), 2.02 (m, 2H), 1.1–0.85 (m, 10 H), 0.7 (t,
3H); 13C NMR (300 MHZ, CDCl3): d 149.9, 131.4, 131.0,
128.8, 128.1, 126.5, 124.0, 122.4, 117.5, 116.7, 35.9, 31.7,
31.0, 29.7, 29.0, 24.8, 22.4, 14.0. HRMS (ESI) Calcd for
C28H29O [Mþ H]þ 381.2218, found 381.2217; Anal. Calcd for
C28H29O: C, 88.38; H, 7.42; Found: C, 88.41; H, 7.35.
EXPERIMENTAL
All chemicals were of research grade and were used as
obtained from Aldrich and Fluka. The reactions were carried
out in a round-bottomed flask of 25 mL capacity at reflux tem-
perature in an efficient fume hood. Analytical thin layer chro-
matography was performed with E. Merck silica gel 60F glass
plates and flash chromatography using E. Merck silica gel
(60–120 mesh). Melting points were determined on a MEL-
TEMP II melting point apparatus and were uncorrected. NMR
spectra were recorded of Gemini 200 MHz Varian instrument
and Avance 300 MHz Bruker UX 300 FT NMR. All NMR
data were obtained in CDCl3 solution and chemical shifts (d)
were given in ppm relative to TMS and are compared with the
reported literature values. Mass spectra were recorded on VG
Micromass 7070 H (EI), VG Autospec (FAB) using Csþ ion
gun, MNBA as a matrix, Applied Biosystems QSTAR XL
High resolution mass spectrometer, Thermofinnigan ESI ion
trap mass spectrometer and GC-MS instruments. Elemental
analyses were performed using a Vario-EL elemental analyzer.
Typical procedure for the preparation of di-
benzoxanthenes. In a typical procedure, a mixture of aldehyde
(1 mmol), b-naphthol (2 mmol), 1,2-dichloroethane (5 mL),
and NaHSO4.SiO2 (100 mg) (Method A) or amberlyst-15 (20
wt % with respect to aldehyde) (method B) was stirred at
reflux for the appropriate time according to Table 1. The pro-
gress of the reaction was monitored by TLC. After completion
of the reaction, the catalyst was filtered off and the organic
Table 1
Synthesis of dibenzoxanthene derivatives using
heterogeneous catalysts.
Yielda (%)
Entry
R
Time(h) Method A Method B
1
2
C6H5
4-ClC6H4
4-FC6H4
2
1.5
2
92
91
96
92
91
92
81
85
87
85
91
80
90
82
81
–
93
90
94
94
90
93
82
83
88
86
90
82
90
83
84
–
3
4
5
4-BrC6H4
3
3
4-O2NC6H4
4-H3CC6H4
H3CCH2CH2
(CH3)2CHCH2
CH3(CH2)3CH2
3,4-(OCH3)2C6H2
3-O2NC6H4
4-OHC6H4
6
7
2
4
8
9
2
4
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
4
2.5
4
4-H3COC6H4
H3C(CH2)5CH2
2-C4H3O
4-C5H4N
4-N(CH3)2C6H4
3
4
2.5
24
24
–
–
Method A ¼ NaHSO4ꢀSiO2; Method B ¼ Amberlyst-15.
a Isolated yields.
Journal of Heterocyclic Chemistry
DOI 10.1002/jhet