Scheme 1
Scheme 2
reagents. Thus, the synthesis of 4 and/or 5 containing three
asymmetric carbon centers typically requires approximately
10 steps from readily available compounds. Another aspect
common to these procedures is the need for reduction of
carboxylic acid derivatives to aldehyde or alcohols in each
three-step cycle. A recently reported ingenious method,2,5b
which is catalytic in chiral auxiliary for C-C bond formation,
involved asymmetric cyclic dimerization of methylketene and
ring opening with racemic 2-methylpentanal to construct the
entire carbon framework of 5 with the desired stereochem-
istry in one step in 35% yield. Subsequent functional
modification over five steps in 42% combined yield led to
the synthesis of 5 in 15% overall yield in six steps.
Conversion of 5 into siphonarienal (3) was then achieved in
three additional steps in 69% combined yield. Thus, 3 was
synthesized in 10% overall yield in nine steps.
The Zr-catalyzed asymmetric carboalumination method we
have recently developed8 has provided (2S,4S,6S)-2,4,6-
trimethyl-1-nonanol (4) of g50/1 dr (13C NMR and >99%
ee by Mosher analysis) in 23% overall yield over seven (or
six isolation) steps from 3-buten-1-ol, as shown in Scheme
2.3 This novel protocol that is totally discrete from any other
methods features the following. (1) (3S)-3-Methyl-1-hexanol
(6) of 90% ee was prepared from 3-buten-1-ol in one step.3
(2) The alcohol thus obtained was used without enantiomeric
separation to prepare (2S,4S)-2,4-dimethyl-1-heptanol (7) of
6.7/1 dr, which, after column chromatography (1/50 EtOAc/
hexanes), provided pure 7 (dr g40/1 by 13C NMR and g98%
ee by Mosher analysis) in 50% yield from 3-buten-1-ol over
four (or three isolation) steps.3 (3) A three-step protocol
consisting of iodination, Pd-catalyzed vinylation, and Zr-
catalyzed asymmetric carboalumination-oxidation furnished,
after column chromatography, pure 43 of g50/1 dr in 46%
combined yield over three steps (or 23% combined yield over
seven (or six isolation) steps from 3-buten-1-ol).
for 1 h.10 The reaction mixture was quenched with CF3COOH
at 0 °C in THF to give siphonarienal (3) in 85% yield over
two steps (Scheme 2), dr g 50/1. Thus, the overall yield of
3 based on 3-buten-1-ol over nine (or seven isolation) steps
is 20%. Its spectral data are in good agreement with those
reported previously.5
Conversion of siphonarienal (3) into siphonarienolone (1)
was achieved in four steps, as summarized in Scheme 3. (2S)-
2-Benzoyloxy-3-pentanone,11 prepared from ethyl (S)-lactate,
was treated with B-chlorodicyclohexylborane and Me2NEt
in ether (-78 to 0 °C, 2 h). The reaction of 3 with the above-
generated enolborane was carried out at -78 °C for 1 h and
then at -20 °C (freezer) for 10 h. The resultant mixture was
treated at 0 °C with MeOH, a buffer (pH 7) solution of NaH2-
PO4 and Na2HPO4, and 30% H2O2 to oxidize any organobo-
ranes. After the standard workup and column chromatogra-
phy (5 to 8% EtOAc in hexanes), 8 was obtained in 82%
yield. Protection of the OH group of 8 with TBSOTf and
2,6-lutidine in 99% yield was followed by removal of the
BzO group with SmI212 and MeOH in THF to give 9 in 94%
yield. Attempted removal of the TBS group with TBAF in
Oxidation of 4 with (COCl)2 (1.2 equiv), DMSO (2.4
equiv), and Et3N (3 equiv)9 produced the corresponding
aldehyde 5. Without isolation-purification, it was treated
with 1.3 equiv of Et3SiCH(Me)CHdNCy, where Cy is
s
cyclohexyl, and BuLi (1.2 equiv) in THF at -78 to 20 °C
(8) (a) Kondakov, D.; Negishi, E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 10771.
(b) Kondakov, D.; Negishi, E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 1577. (c) Huo,
S.; Negishi, E. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 3253. (d) Huo, S.; Shi, J.; Negishi, E.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 2141. (e) Negishi, E. In Catalytic
Asymmetric Synthesis II; Ojima, I., Ed.; Wiley-VCH: New York, 2000; p
165. (f) Negishi, E.; Huo, S. Pure Appl. Chem. 2002, 74, 151.
(10) Corey, E. J.; Enders, D.; Bock, M. G. Tetrahedron Lett. 1976, 1, 7.
(11) (a) Paterson, I.; Wallace, D. J.; Velazquez, S. M. Tetrahedron Lett.
1994, 35, 9083. (b) Cowden, C. J.; Paterson, I. Org. React. 1997, 51, 1. (c)
Williams, D. R.; Turske, R. A. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 3217.
(9) Omura, K.; Swern, D. Tetrahedron 1978, 34, 1651.
(12) Molander, G. A.; Hahn, G. J. Org. Chem. 1986, 51, 1135.
1426
Org. Lett., Vol. 6, No. 9, 2004