1584
Z. Xiao et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 14 (2004) 1581–1584
11. Lee, K. H. Med. Res. Rev. 1999, 19, 569.
7.01 (s, 1H, 5-H), 6.34 (s, 1H, 8-H), 6.16 (s, 2H, 20, 60-H),
5.91 (s, 2H, OCH2O), 4.54 (dd, 1H, J=3.5, 12.5 Hz, 4-H),
4.44–4.30 (m, 2H, 13-H2), 4.07–3.97 (m, 2H, 11-H2), 3.88
(dd, 1H, J=3.0, 12.0 Hz, 1-H), 3.82 (s, 3H, 40-OCH3),
3.76 (s, 6H, 30,50-OCH3), 2.39 (m, 1H, 2-H), 2.22 (m, 1H,
3-H), 1.80 (m, 1H, OH). Anal. calcd C22H24O9S. 3=4
H2O.
12. The protocol used to synthesize 9 was similar to that used
for its 40-demethylated congener as previously described
in: Zhou, X. M.; Lee, K. J. H.; Cheng, J.; Wu, S. S.; Chen,
H. X.; Guo, X.; Cheng, Y. C.; Lee, K. H. J. Med. Chem.
1994, 37, 287.
13. Compound 10: To a solution of 9 (300 mg, 0.564 mmol) in
10 mL of dry CH2Cl2 was added DMAP (60 mg, 0.48
mmol) and SOCl2 (0.15 mL, 1.99 mmol), and the mixture
was stirred at room temperature for 1.5 h. The mixture was
then diluted with EtOAc, washed with water and brine,
dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, and concentrated under
reduced pressure. The residue was purified by flash col-
umn chromatography using EtOAc–hexane (1:3) as an
eluent to give 255 mg (78%) of 10: white solid, mp 119–
120 ꢀC, [a]D27.4 ꢁ193.05 (c 0.47, CHCl3); IR (film) 2960,
1590, 1504, 1483, 1329 cmꢁ1; MS m/e: 578 [M]+; 1H NMR
(CDCl3) d 6.91 (s, 1=2 H, 5-H), 6.90 (s, 1/2 H, 5-H), 6.344
(s, 1=2 H, 8-H), 6.341 (s, 1=2 H, 8-H), 6.21 (s, 2H, 20, 60-
H), 5.91 (d, 2H, J=1.8 Hz, OCH2O), 4.78–4.70 (m, 1=2
H, 13-H), 4.50–4.35 (m, 2H, 4-H, 13-H), 4.21–3.86 (m,
3H, 1-H, 11-H2), 3.84 (s, 3/2H, 40-OCH3), 3.83 (s, 3/2H,
40-OCH3), 3.78 (s, 3H, 30, 50-OCH3), 3.60–3.51 (m, 1=2 H,
13-H), 2.50 (m, 1=2 H, 2-H), 2.38 (m, 1=2 H, 2-H), 2.33
(m, 1=2 H, 3-H), 2.20 (m, 1=2 H, 3-H), 0.97 (s, 9/2H,
t-BuSi), 0.96 (s, 9/2H, t-BuSi), 0.30 (s, 3H, CH3-Si), 0.19
(s, 3H, CH3-Si). Anal. calcd C28H38O9SiS. 1=2 H2O.
14. Compound 11: 200 mg (0.35 mmol) of 10 in 5 mL of THF
was added 365 mg (1.38 mmol) of Bu4NF. The reaction
mixture was stirred at room temperature for 2 h. After the
reaction was completed as monitored by TLC, the reac-
tion mixture was evaporated to dryness and CH2Cl2 was
added. The solution was then washed with H2O and dried
over anhydrous Na2SO4. After the solvent was removed
in vacuo, the crude products was chromatographed on
silica gel (eluent: EtOAc:hexane=1:1) to separate the two
diastereoisomers 11a and 11b. Compound 11a: white
solid, mp 129–130 ꢀC (dec.), [a]2D9.2 +71.9 (c 0.16,
CH2Cl2); IR (film) 3500 (OH), 2938, 1591, 1507, 1203,
15. The protocol used to prepare 7 was similar to that pre-
viously described in: Kamal, A.; Laxman, N.; Ramesh, G.
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2000, 10, 2059. Compound 7: 49
mg (0.1 mmol) of a mixture of 11a and 11b was dissolved
in 2 mL of dry CH2Cl2. Sodium iodide (45 mg, 0.3 mmol)
was added and the mixture was stirred for 5 min.
MeSO3H (29 mg, 0.3 mmol) was added in dropwise at
0
ꢀC and stirred for 5 h at room temperature. Nitrogen
was bubbled through the solution to drive off the excess
HI; the solution was then evaporated in vacuo and used
for the next step without further purification. To the
above crude product, anhydrous BaCO3 (40 mg, 0.2
mmol) and 4-nitroaniline (17 mg, 0.12 mmol) in 2 mL of
dry THF under nitrogen were added and stirred for 8 h at
room temperature. The reaction mixture was diluted with
EtOAc, filtered, washed with water and brine, dried over
anhydrous Na2SO4, and purified by column chromato-
graphy (eluent: EtOAc:hexane=1:1) to afford 11 mg (19%)
of 7: Yellow power. Mp 144–146 ꢀC, [a]D30 ꢁ192.5 (c 0.2,
acatone); IR (film) 2936, 1585, 1366, 1216, 1115 cmꢁ1; MS
m/e: 570 [MꢁH]+; 1H NMR (CDCl3) d 8.15 (d, 1H,
J=9.0 Hz, 300,500-H), 8.13 (d, 1H, J=9.0 Hz, 300,500-H),
6.72 (d, 1H, J=9.0 Hz, 200, 600-H), 6.70 (d, 1H, J=9.0 Hz,
200, 600-H), 6.60 (s, 1/2 H, 5-H), 6.58 (s, 1=2 H, 5-H), 6.38
(s, 1=2 H, 8-H), 6.37 (s, 1=2 H, 8-H), 6.10 (s, 1H, 20, 60-H),
6.09 (s, 1H, 20, 60-H), 5.92, 5.90 (d, 2H, J=1.4 Hz,
OCH2O), 4.98 (m, 1H, NH), 4.41–4.25 (m, 2H, 4-H, 13-
H), 4.24–4.11 (m, 2H, 1-H, 13-H), 4.02–3.96 (m, 2H, 11-
H2), 3.80 (s, 3H, 30,50-OCH3), 3.79 (s, 3H, 30,50-OCH3),
2.80 (m, 1=2 H, 2-H), 2.62 (m, 1H, 3-H), 2.55 (m, 1=2 H,
2-H).
16. Cell growth inhibition was assayed using the sulforhoda-
mine B (SRB) protocol developed by Rubinstein et al.
(Rubinstein, L. V.; Shoemaker, R. H.; Paull, K. D.;
Simon, R. M.; Tosini, S.; Skehan, P.; Scudiero, D. A.;
Monks, M. R. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1990, 82, 1113). Drug
exposure was for 3 days, and the ED50 value was inter-
polated from dose–response data.
17. The plasmid DNA relaxation assay was carried out
according to the procedure described previously (Krish-
nan, P.; Bastow, K. F. Anti-Cancer Drug Des. 2000, 15,
255). Assays were performed with drug concentrations of
50 mM.
1
1125 cmꢁ1; MS m/e: 487 [M+Na]+; H NMR (CDCl3) d
7.03 (s, 1H, 5-H), 6.36 (s, 1H, 8-H), 6.17 (s, 2H, 20, 60-H),
5.93 (s, 2H, OCH2O), 4.80 (dd, 1H, J=10.5, 12.0 Hz, 13-
H), 4.50–4.29 (m, 3H, 4-H, 11-H2), 4.09–3.98 (m, 1H, 1-
H), 3.83 (s, 3H, 40-OCH3), 3.78 (s, 6H, 30,50-OCH3), 3.55
(dd, 1.5H, J=10.3, 12.5 Hz, 13-H), 2.50 (m, 1H, 2-H),
2.40–2.24 (m, 1H, 3-H), 2.17 (d, 1H, J=8.1 Hz, OH).
Anal. calcd C22H24O9S 1=2 H2O. Compound 11b: white
solid, mp 122–123 ꢀC (dec.), [a]2D8 ꢁ215.7 (c 0.055,
CH2Cl2); IR (film) 3500 (OH), 2938, 1591, 1507, 1203,
1
1125 cmꢁ1; MS m/e: 487 [M+Na]+; H NMR (CDCl3) d