Scheme 1. Formal Heterolytic Activation of Elemental Hydrogen Mitigates Competitive Conjugate Reduction Manifolds by Enabling
Monohydride-Based Catalytic Cycles.
formed with control of the relative stereochemistry in a
completely atom economical fashion.
under hydrogenation conditions was studied using (COD)2-
RhI(OTf) as a precatalyst. A mechanism was envisioned
whereby enolate-hydrogen reductive elimination pathways
are disabled through deprotonation of the (hydrido)metal
intermediates LnRhIII(H)2 or (enolato)RhIII(H)Ln (Scheme 1).
The principal challenge in using elemental hydrogen for
reductive enolate generation involves circumventing 1,4-
reduction.6 To overcome this pitfall, it was speculated that
hydrogenative enolate generation might be achieved upon
formal heterolytic activation of elemental hydrogen to yield
(monohydrido)metal intermediates.7 Formal heterolytic ac-
tivation of hydrogen may occur through tandem oxidative
addition of hydrogen, followed by reductive elimination of
HX, which may be assisted by base. Unlike the mechanism
for alkene hydrogenation involving Wilkinson’s catalyst,8,9
cationic rhodium complexes appear to operate through formal
heterolytic hydrogen activation pathways.7,10,11 This is likely
due to the enhanced acidity of cationic rhodium hydrides
with respect to their neutral counterparts.12 Predicated on this
analysis, and given the established efficiency of aldol
additions involving rhodium enolates,13 aldol cycloreduction
To probe the viability of ketones as electrophilic partners,
the cycloreduction of monoenone monoketone 1a was
explored. Exposure of 1a to conditions related to those
employed for intra- and intermolecular condensation with
aldehyde partners resulted in formation of the desired aldol
product, accompanied by substantial quantities of conjugate
reduction product 1c. While these reactions proceed readily
at room temperature, decreased variation in the ratio of
cycloreduction to conjugate reduction products was observed
at higher temperatures, presumably due to an attendant
decrease in the concentration of hydrogen in solution. Under
these conditions, syn-1b was obtained in 72% isolated yield
as a single diastereomer as determined by 1H NMR analysis,
along with a 20% isolated yield of conjugate reduction
product 1c. The structural assignment of 1b was corroborated
by single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis.5 For this and
other transformations, a series of control experiments were
routinely performed to ensure the cycloreductions proceed
in accordance with the postulated mechanism. Exposure of
conjugate reduction product 1c to the reaction conditions does
not produce 1b. Conversely, aldol product 1b does not
undergo retro-aldolization upon exposure to the reaction
conditions. Additionally, â-substituted enones are unreactive
toward triarylphosphine addition, thus excluding tandem
Morita-Baylis-Hillman cyclization-conjugate reduction
pathways. These conditions proved to be general for the syn-
(5) Borane-mediated aldol cycloreduction of keto-enones was recently
reported by our lab: Huddleston, R. R.; Cauble, D. F.; Krische, M. J. J.
Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 11.
(6) For selected reviews on the conjugate reduction of enones via catalytic
hydrogenation, see: (a) Keinan, E.; Greenspoon, N. Partial Reduction of
Enones, Styrenes and Related Systems. In ComprehensiVe Organic Syn-
thesis; Trost, B. M., Ed.; Permagon: New York, 1991; Vol. III, p 523. (b)
House, H. O. Modern Synthetic Reactions, 2nd ed.; Benjamin: Menlo Park,
CA, 1972. (c) James, B. R. Homogeneous Hydrogenation; Wiley-Inter-
science: New York, 1973. (d) Rylander, P. N. Hydrogenation Methods;
Academic Press: London, 1985. (e) Rylander, P. N. Catalytic Hydrogena-
tion in Organic Synthesis; Academic Press: New York, 1979. (f) Freifelder,
M. Catalytic Hydrogenation in Organic Synthesis; Wiley-Interscience: New
York, 1978.
(7) For a review on the heterolytic activation of elemental hydrogen,
see: Brothers, P. J. Prog. Inorg. Chem. 1981, 28, 1.
(8) (a) Tolman, C. A.; Meakin, P. Z.; Lindner, D. L.; Jesson, J. P. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1974, 96, 2762. (b) Halpern, J.; Okamoto, T.; Zakhariev,
A. J. Mol. Catal. 1976, 2, 65.
(9) For a review, see: Marko, L. Pure Appl. Chem. 1979, 51, 2211.
(10) Monohydride formation by deprotonation of a dihydride intermediate
is known for cationic Rh complexes: (a) Schrock, R. R.; Osborn, J. A. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1976, 98, 2134. (b) Schrock, R. R.; Osborn, J. A. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1976, 98, 2143. (c) Schrock, R. R.; Osborn, J. A. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1976, 98, 4450.
(11) Direct heterolytic activation of hydrogen by RhCl(CO)(PPh3)2 has
been suggested, but the mechanism likely involves an intermediate
dihydride: Evans, D.; Osborn, J. A.; Wilkinson, G. J. Chem. Soc., A 1968,
3133.
(13) For a review, see: Burkhardt, E. R.; Doney, J. J.; Slough, G. A.;
Stack, J. M.; Heathcock, C. H.; Bergman, R. G. Pure Appl. Chem. 1988,
60, 1.
(14) Procedure: To a 13 × 100 mm test tube charged with Rh(COD)2OTf
(0.0462 mmol, 10 mol %) and Ph3P (0.111 mmol, 24 mol %) was added
DCE (0.185 M, 2.5 mL). The mixture was stirred for 10 min under an
argon atmosphere, at which point the substrate (0.462 mmol, 100 mol %)
and K2CO3 (0.37 mmol, 80 mol %) were added. The system was purged
with hydrogen gas for 3 min, and the reaction was allowed to stir at 80 °C
under 1 atm of hydrogen until complete consumption of the substrate. Yields
represent averages of three runs. Cycloreductions to produce compounds
6b, 12b, and 13b-18b were conducted at 25 °C.
(12) For a review, see: Norton, J. R. In Transition Metal Hydrides;
Dedieu, A. Ed.; New York, 1992, Chapter 9.
1144
Org. Lett., Vol. 5, No. 7, 2003