Functional Mimicry of Carboxypeptidase A
A R T I C L E S
sponding reaction.3 Similarly, molecularly imprinted polymers
(MIPs) offer an excellent possibility to mimic the active site of
natural enzymes since not only the shape of the transition state
can be mimicked by imprinting but also, at the same time,
suitable catalytically active groups and binding sites can be
introduced into the active site in a predetermined orientation.5
In molecular imprinting a highly cross-linked copolymer is
formed during polymerization around a template molecule. The
monomer mixture contains functional monomers that can
reversibly interact with the template through covalent or
noncovalent interactions. The resultant complex is subsequently
incorporated into a network polymer by copolymerization in
the presence of an excess of a cross-linking monomer and a
solvent acting as an inert porogen. After removal of the template
from the macroporous polymer, an imprint containing functional
groups in a certain orientation remains in the polymer. The shape
of the formed imprint and the arrangement of the functional
groups are complementary to the structure of the template.5,6
Such imprinted polymers show high selectivity in rebinding to
their own template molecules. Molecularly imprinted polymers
show antibody-like recognition characteristics and have mean-
while been prepared for a large number of compound classes.
Their preparation has also become an efficient approach for the
development of synthetic enzyme models with high selectivity.
By analogy to the preparation of catalytic antibodies,3 numerous
experiments have been undertaken to mimic enzyme behavior
by imprinting with stable transition state analogues (TSAs) in
reactions including dehydrofluorination, hydrolyses, Diels-Alder
reactions, transaminase reactions, and others.7,8
in order to emulate carboxypeptidase A-like activity.9 An
unusually high catalytic activity for carbonate hydrolysis was
obtained by imprinting with a stable transition state analogue
template as well as introduction of an amidinium group and a
Cu(II)9a or Zn(II)9b center into the active site in a defined
orientation to each other.
Carboxypeptidase A (CPA, EC3.4.17.1) is a zinc-containing
metalloprotease that has the function of removing the C-terminal
amino acid residue from a peptide chain.10 As one of the most
intensively studied enzymes, CPA has contributed enormously
to the elucidation of the catalytic mechanism of other metallo-
enzymes and also served as a model of an inhibitor in the design
of new medicines.10a In the active site of CPA, the zinc ion
coordinated tightly to the amino acid residues of His 69, Glu
72, and His 196 is essential for the enzyme reaction.10b The
guanidinium moiety of Arg 127 binds the oxyanion generated
in the rate-limiting step of the formation of the tetrahedral
transition state. Substrate specificity is brought about by a
hydrophobic pocket and another guanidinium moiety of Arg
145.
In this paper, in continuation of work published in two short
communications,9 the preparation of further artificial models
for the natural enzyme carboxypeptidase A is described and
the properties of this type of catalysts are discussed in detail.
For this, new functional monomers, substrates, and imprinted
polymers were prepared. The type and strength of interaction
of functional monomers with the template in the presence or
absence of Cu(II) are characterized more in detail. The catalytic
activity of the imprinted polymers is discussed in relation to
their chemical structure and the type of preparation. The
optimized catalysts possess a remarkably high catalytic activity
surpassing that of the corresponding catalytic antibodies by 2.5
orders of magnitude. These are also by far the highest catalytic
activities found for catalysts based on molecularly imprinted
polymers. The highest activity is obtained with a new type of
dimeric binding site containing only one Cu2+ center.
This type of research provides more information for the
understanding of the catalysis of natural enzymes, since these
models show not only high catalytic activity but also other
typical enzyme properties such as selectivity, Michaelis-Menten
kinetics, high efficiency, high proficiency, competitive inhibition,
and a bell-shaped pH rate profile.
Although earlier attempts to mimic enzyme behavior using
imprinted polymers showed only low or moderate catalytic
efficiency,7 very promising results for catalyzed hydrolyses were
obtained in recent years using MIP catalysts.8,9 It follows from
these results that the ability for TSA binding alone is not
sufficient to obtain a really high rate of acceleration; increasing
the transition state binding by steric and electronic effects in
combination with correctly incorporating and positioning the
functional groups is essential for the construction of an effective
enzyme model.2,9
Previously, MIP-based catalysts with both TSA binding sites
and appropriate catalytic groups have been prepared in our group
(6) (a) Wulff, G. Angew. Chem. 1995, 107, 1958–1979; Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 1995, 34, 1812-1832. (b) Cormack, P. A. G.; Mosbach, K.
React. Funct. Polym. 1999, 41, 115–124. (c) Shea, K. J. Trends Polym.
Sci. 1994, 5, 166–173. (d) Sellergren, B., Ed. Molecularly Imprinted
Polymers. Man-made Mimics of Antibodies and Their Application in
Analytical Chemistry; Elsevier: Amsterdam, 2000. (e) Haupt, K.;
Mosbach, K. Chem. ReV. 2000, 100, 2495–2504. (f) Wulff, G. In
Templated Organic Synthesis; Diederich, F., Stang, P. J., Eds.; Wiley-
VCH: Weinheim, 2000; pp 39-73.
(7) (a) Robinson, D. K.; Mosbach, K. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun.
1989, 969–970. (b) Beach, J. V.; Shea, K. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994,
116, 379–380. (c) Ohkubo, K.; Urata, Y.; Honda, Y.; Nakashima, Y.;
Yoshinaga, K. Polymer 1994, 35, 5372–5374. (d) Sellergren, B.;
Karmalkar, R. N.; Shea, K. J. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 4009–4027.
(e) Svenson, J.; Zheng, N.; Nicholls, I. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004,
126, 8554–8560. (f) Maddock, S. C.; Pasetto, P.; Resmini, M. Chem.
Commun. 2004, 536–537.
2. Experimental Section
2.1. General Procedures. All reagents were reagent grade and
were used without further purification, unless otherwise noted.
Solvents were purified by standard methods. Column chromatog-
raphy was carried out on silica gel 60 (70-230 mesh). NMR spectra
were recorded using a Bruker AC250F operating at 500 MHz for
1H NMR and 125 MHz for 13C NMR. IR spectra were recorded
on a Bruker IFS-FT66V infrared spectrometer. Elemental analyses
were determined on a Perkin-Elmer 240 DS elemental analyzer.
2.2. Syntheses of Templates and Substrates. The synthesis of
the template 5 and the substrates phenyl-(2-pyridyl)-carbonate (7)
and di-(2-pyridyl)-carbonate (8) (Chart 1) were described previously
in our recent communication (see Supporting Information in ref
9a).
(8) (a) Wulff, G.; Gross, T.; Scho¨nfeld, R. Angew. Chem. 1997, 109, 2049–
2052; Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1997, 36, 1962-1964. (b)
Strikowsky,; A, G.; Kaspar, D.; Gru¨n, M.; Green, B. S.; Hradil, J.;
Wulff, G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 6295–6296. (c) Emgenbroich,
M.; Wulff, G. Chem. Eur. J. 2003, 9, 4106–4117. (d) Wulff, G.; Chong,
B.-O.; Kolb, U. Angew. Chem. 2006, 118, 3021–3024; Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 2955-2958.
2.3. Syntheses of Monomers. The preparation of the new
monomer N,N-[N′′-(2-aminoethyl)-1,5-(3-azapentylen)]-bis[(N′-eth-
yl)-4-vinylbenzamidine] (3) is performed in a similar manner as
(9) (a) Liu, J.-Q.; Wulff, G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 7452–7453.
(b) Liu, J.-Q.; Wulff, G. Angew. Chem. 2004, 116, 1307–1311; Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 1287-1290.
(10) (a) Christianson, D. W.; Lipscomb, W. N. Acc. Chem. Res. 1989, 22,
6269.000. (b) Philips, M. A.; Fletterick, R.; Rutter, W. J. J. Biol. Chem.
1990, 265, 20692–20698.
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 130, NO. 25, 2008 8045