6242 J . Org. Chem., Vol. 61, No. 18, 1996
Casarini and Lunazzi
Ta ble 3. In ter con ver sion Ba r r ier (∆G* in k ca l m ol-1
)
a n d An ti/Syn Ra tio a t th e Equ ilibr iu m for Com p ou n d s
2b-e a t Ap p r op r ia te Tem p er a tu r es
compd
∆G*
Anti:Syn
temp (°C)
solvent
2b (RdMe)
2c (RdEt)
2d (RdPri)
2e (RdBut)
10.9
11.7
13.4
22.5
22.5
67:33
63:37
68:32
64:36
47:53
-85
-65
-55
+21
+30
CHF2Cl
CD2Cl2
CD2Cl2
CDCl3
acetone-d6
CDCl3. In agreement with the observations made in the
case of 2e the conformers ratio of 2d becomes about 1:1
in polar solvents (e.g. CD3OD and acetone-d6, at -55 °C).
A further support is thus offered to the proposed assign-
ment of the anti structure to the more stable conformer
in nonpolar solvents. The barrier for the interconversion
(∆G* ) 13.4 kcal mol-1, Table 3) was determined by
complete line shape analysis of the two 13C signals of the
isopropyl methyl groups, which exhibit a sufficiently
large chemical shift difference (12.5 Hz at 300 MHz).
For the less hindered derivatives 2c (R ) Et)6 and 2b
(R ) Me),7 the barriers (Table 3) were found even lower
(11.7 and 10.9 kcal mol-1, respectively): as an example
the temperature dependence of the acetyl methyl 1H
signals of 2b is reported in Figure 2, accompanied by the
appropriate line shape simulation.
F igu r e 2. Experimental (left) 1H signals (300 MHz in CHF2Cl)
of the methyl groups of the acetyl moieties of 2b as function
of temperature. On the right the computer simulation, ob-
tained with the rate constants (k in s-1) indicated, are also
displayed.
The differences between the ∆G* values of 2e (R ) But)
and 2d (R ) Pri) is much larger (i.e. 9.1 kcal mol-1) than
the difference between the values of 2d and 2c (i.e. 1.7
kcal mol-1) as well as between that of 2c and 2b (i.e. 0.8
kcal mol-1). This somehow reflects the much larger steric
hindrance of the tert-butyl group with respect to the other
alkyl groups. The same trend had been also found in acyl
mesityl ketones (i.e. derivatives of type 1): for R ) But,
Pri, Et, Me their ∆G* values are, in fact, 19.2, 9.1, 7.2,
6.1, respectively.1 The barriers observed here for com-
pounds of type 2 are, as an average, 4.2 kcal mol-1 larger
than those of the corresponding acyl mesityl ketones, 1.
This seems too large an enhancement to be solely
explained by the electron-withdrawing properties of the
second RCO moiety in position 4.8 An additional contri-
bution to this enhancement should be also attributable
to the reciprocal buttressing effect of the aryl-bonded
methyl groups in derivatives 2. For example, the pair
of methyl groups in positions 2,6 would be pushed closer
to the RCO moiety in position 1 by the presence of the
second pair of methyl groups in positions 3,5 (the same
would obviously occur for the methyl groups in positions
3,5 with respect to the acyl substituents in position 4).
As a consequence the aryl-bonded methyl groups in
derivatives of type 2 can exert a greater steric hindrance
upon the RCO moieties, further enhancing the corre-
sponding Ar-C(O)R rotational barriers. Such an inter-
pretation seems, apparently, supported also by molecular
mechanics calculations.4 In the case of 2e, for instance,
the computed geometry suggests a Me(2)-C(2)-C(1)
angle of 121° whereas in the tert-butyl mesityl ketone
(1, R ) But) the same angle is computed to be slightly
wider (i.e. 123°). The buttressing effect might be indeed
responsible for such a difference.
Not even at -140 °C (in CHF2Cl, at 300 MHz) was it
possible to detect dynamic NMR features leading to
observable conformers in the case of 2a (R ) H). This is
because 2a , contrary to 2b-e, adopts a planar conforma-
tion, according to theoretical calculations and lanthanide
induced shift (LIS) measurements carried out on a
similar derivative (mesitylaldehyde).9 Also, the com-
puted Ar-C(O)H (Ar ) 2,4,6-trimethylphenyl) rotational
barrier is predicted10 to be too low for NMR detection,
contrary to the case of less hindered benzaldehydes.11
Con clu sion s
Durene derivatives containing a pair of RCO groups
in positions 1,4 display syn,anti conformers due to
restricted rotation about the Ar-C(O)R single bonds, the
corresponding dihedral angles being essentially orthogo-
nal.1,2 The free energy of activation (∆G*) for the
interconversion increases with the increasing bulkiness
of the alkyl groups (R) of the acyl moiety, eventually
reaching, for R ) tert-butyl, a value high enough as to
transform the stereolabile conformers into configuration-
ally stable isomers. Although isolation of one of the two
enantiomers arising from restricted motions in aryl
ketones had been reported,12,13 this represents a quite
(6) The low temperature 1H spectrum of 2c does not display, even
at 300 MHz, separate signals for the syn and anti conformers: only
an unresolved shoulder was observed for the triplet of the methyl group
of the EtCO moiety. This accidental coincidence outlines how the
chemical shift of the aryl-bonded methyl groups cannot be used for
conformational assignment. A meaningful line shape analysis could
only be obtained by monitoring the 13C lines of the CO moiety which,
in CD2Cl2 at -65 °C, display a relatively large separation (33 Hz at
75.5 MHz).
(7) The position of the lines due to the aryl-bonded methyl groups
is reversed in 2b with respect to 2d , 2e in that the signal of the more
stable (anti) conformer appears upfield (by 0.005 ppm) rather than
downfield. This confirms once more how the relative chemical shifts
of these groups do not follow a pattern which can be related to the
structure in a simple manner.
(9) Abraham, R. J .; Angiolini, S.; Edgar, M.; Sancassan, F. J . Chem.
Soc., Perkin Trans 2 1995, 1973.
(10) Andersson, S.; Carter, R. E.; Drakenberg, T. Acta Chem. Scand.
1984, B38, 579.
(11) Lunazzi, L.; Ticca, A.; Macciantelli, D.; Spunta, G. J . Chem.
Soc., Perkin Trans 2 1976, 1121.
(8) J ennings, W. B.; Saket, B. M. J . Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2
1985, 1005.