2006 Organometallics, Vol. 23, No. 9, 2004
Tsang et al.
Square-pyramidal tungstacycles also appear to be more
stable with respect to olefin loss than TBP tungsta-
cycles.17
also been noted in a rhenium-based system.39 It is not
known at this time whether ring contraction is a feature
of the mechanism of rearrangement of molybdacyclo-
pentane or tungstacyclopentane rings, although that
would now seem to be a more likely possibility than
simple â-hydride elimination/reductive elimination (as
in Scheme 2).
Rearrangement of molybdacyclobutane complexes
does not appear to be a significant mode of their
decomposition, although small amounts of rearrange-
ment products of both the initial molybdacyclobutane
and unsubstituted molybdacyclobutane complexes have
been observed in several systems reported here. Prod-
ucts of rearrangement of molybdacyclobutanes have
been observed in other molybdenum systems that
contain species of this general type.20 Formation of what
appears to be cyclopropane has never been observed
before in systems of this type, or any high oxidation
state alkylidene system to the best of our knowledge.
Cyclopropane would seem to be formed most likely
through reductive elimination in an unsubstituted mo-
lybdacyclobutane complex. The fact that the amount of
cyclopropane that is formed is small is consistent with
the predominant form of metalacyclobutane decomposi-
tion being either rearrangement or metathesis. In
general, formation of cyclopropanes in reactions between
carbene complexes and olefins predominates as metals
become more electron rich. For example, Casey showed
that (CO)5WdCPh2 would react with olefins to yield
both cyclopropanes and metathesis products in substo-
ichiometric quantities31 and that (CO)5WdCHPh would
react with olefins at -78 °C to yield cyclopropanes
exclusively.32 Carbenoid complexes of later transition
metals such as copper yield only cyclopropanes upon
reaction with olefins.33
In the molybdenum systems explored here it appears
that unsubstituted molybdacyclopentane complexes lose
ethylene more readily than tungstacyclopentane com-
plexes, i.e., the equilibrium between ethylene and
metalacyclopentane complexes lies more toward ethyl-
ene complexes when the metal is molybdenum. Catalytic
dimerization of ethylene to 1-butene also appears to be
relatively slow in the molybdenum systems explored
here, either because metalacyclopentane complexes are
less easily formed, or because they rearrange more
slowly, or (most likely) both. In contrast, slow dimer-
ization of ethylene to 1-butene was found in two related
tungsten systems.16 Tungsten systems appear to be less
prone to lose ethylene from a tungstacyclopentane to
give an ethylene complex and more prone toward
rearrangement by a â-hydride rearrangement-based
process. The tendency of W ethylene complexes to react
with ethylene to form tungstacyclopentanes is one
reason tungsten ethylene complexes have not been
isolated. The lower tendency for molybdenum ethylene
complexes to form molybdacyclopentanes allows a mo-
lybdenum ethylene complex to be isolated in one in-
stance. It should be noted that rearrangement of
tantalacyclopentane complexes to olefins involves a
contraction of the TaC4 ring to a TaC3 ring, the so-called
“ring contraction” mechanism.34-38 Ring contraction has
Many of the findings reported here are similar to
those observed in molybdenum and tungsten imido
alkylidene systems that contain the [o-(Me3SiN)2C6H4]2-
supporting ligand.18,19,23 Both tungsten(VI)23 and mo-
lybdenum(VI)18,19 phenylimido dineopentyl and neopen-
tylidene complexes (as PMe3 adducts) were prepared.
The tungsten dineopentyl complex will react slowly with
ethylene at temperatures above 70 °C to give neopen-
tane (from the initial R-hydrogen abstraction reaction),
tert-butylethylene (from the reaction of the intermediate
neopentylidene complex with ethylene), and a structur-
ally characterized (distorted square pyramidal) tung-
stacyclopentane complex. In reactions between W(NPh)-
[o-(Me3SiN)2C6H4](CH-t-Bu)(PMe3) and ethylene the
initial R tert-butyl-substituted tungstacyclobutane com-
plex was observed in solution, as were the unsubstituted
tungstacyclobutane and ethylene complexes. All were
converted into the tungstacyclopentane complex with
time in the presence of ethylene. In [o-(Me3SiN)2C6H4]W
complexes, the tungstacyclobutane did not appear to
rearrange to propylene and the tungstacyclopentane
complex did not appear to rearrange to 1-butene.
We conclude that reactions between ethylene and
enantiomerically pure biphenolate and binaphtholate
complexes proceed through intermediates that have
been proposed in other high oxidation state alkylidene
systems, although these intermediates cannot be iso-
lated and the precise outcome depends on many factors.
Unfortunately, however, precisely how actual meta-
thesis reactions in which ethylene is formed can alter
the outcome of those reactions still cannot be predicted
at this time. Nevertheless, it is clear that the end result
in the presence of ethylene is reduction of the metal to
Mo(IV), either as a simple ethylene complex, or in the
form of some other as yet unidentified species such as
a dimer that contains bridging imido ligands.20 In cases
where the yield of the ethylene complex is high we are
interested in exploring ways of regenerating a molyb-
denum alkylidene complex, e.g., by transferring an
alkylidene fragment from an ylide.40-42
Exp er im en ta l Section
Gen er a l. All reactions were conducted in oven or flame-
dried glassware under an inert atmosphere of nitrogen or
argon. Commercially available chemicals were obtained from
Aldrich Co. or Lancaster Synthesis. Liquid reagents were
distilled from CaH2 under nitrogen and stored over molecular
sieves (4 Å) before use. Ether, pentane, toluene, benzene, and
(37) Schrock, R. R.; McLain, S. J .; Sancho, J . Pure Appl. Chem. 1980,
52, 729.
(31) Casey, C. P.; Burkhardt, T. J . J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1974, 96, 7808.
(32) Casey, C. P.; Polichnowski, S. W.; Shusterman, A. J .; J ones, C.
R. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1979, 101, 7282.
(33) Kirmse, W. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 1088.
(34) McLain, S. J .; Schrock, R. R. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1978, 100, 1315.
(35) McLain, S. J .; Wood, C. D.; Schrock, R. R. J . Am. Chem. Soc.
1979, 101, 4558.
(38) Smith, S.; McLain, S. J .; Schrock, R. R. J . Organomet. Chem.
1980, 202, 269.
(39) Yang, G. K.; Bergman, R. G. Organometallics 1985, 4, 129.
(40) Sharp, P. R.; Schrock, R. R. J . Organomet. Chem. 1979, 171,
43.
(41) J ohnson, L. K.; Frey, M.; Ulibarri, T. A.; Virgil, S. C.; Grubbs,
R. H.; Ziller, J . W. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 8167.
(42) J ohnson, L. K.; Virgil, S. C.; Grubbs, R. H.; Ziller, J . W. J . Am.
Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 5384.
(36) McLain, S. J .; Sancho, J .; Schrock, R. R. J . Am. Chem. Soc.
1979, 101, 5451.