P. S. Shirude et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 45 (2004) 3085–3088
3087
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
a
h
0.3
0.2
0.1
b
c
i
0 10 20 30 40 5060708090
Temperature (°C)
Figure 2. PNA:DNA complexation by gel shift assay: lane 1, ssPNA
12 (aeg-T8);lane 2, ssDNA 14;lane 3, ssPNA 6;lane 4, PNA 6+ DNA
14;lane 5, PNA 12 (aeg-T8)+DNA 14;lane 6, PNA 8+ DNA 14.
d
e
is interesting since from an earlier study13 based on
piperidines with a different substitution pattern, it was
suggested that six-membered rings are unlikely to sta-
bilize the derived PNA structures for complex formation
with DNA. In the present aepipPNA analogues the
stereochemical dispositions of substituents seem to lead
to a favorable pre-organization of PNA for the forma-
tion of stable DNA triplexes. In this context, work is in
progress in our laboratory to examine the implications
on the duplex and triplex stability of aepipPNAs con-
stituted from other diastereomers and nucleobases.
f
g
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Temperature (°C)
Figure 1. UV–Tm first derivative curves of DNA:PNA2 complexes. (a)
14:5;(b) 14:8, (c) 15:11, (d) 14:9, (e) 15:13, (f) 14:12, (g) 14:10. Inset: (h)
14:6, (i) 14:7.
Tm. Sequences 8, 9, and 10 were constructed with 2 aepip
units, one at the C-terminus and the second aepip unit at
third, fifth, and seventh base positions, respectively, to
study the positional effect of the modified units with
respect to each other. A synergistic stabilizing effect was
observed with the second modified aepip unit in all the
cases (8:14, 9:14, and 10:14). The maximum benefit per
additional unit was observed (DTm þ 4 °C) when the
second aepipPNA unit was placed nearer to the C-ter-
minal unit (8:14). The complexes of the modified PNAs
(5, 6) with DNA 16 (Table 1) having a single mismatch
in the center of the sequence, were destabilized with a
DTm ꢀ ꢁ24 °C (data not shown). However, the complex
of control PNA 12 with mismatch DNA 16, only shows
linear increase in absorbance and does not show a sig-
moidal transition. The stability of the mixed C/T base
aepip-PNA:DNA complexes containing N-terminus
substitution (11:15) was higher by 9 °C compared to that
of the control complex 13:15 when the orientation of the
DNA strand was antiparallel with respect to both PNA
strands. This result contrasts with the homothymine
oligomers where the relative orientation of the DNA
strand remains ambiguous.5c The percent hyperchrom-
icity accompanying the melting of DNA:aepip-PNA
complexes was also enhanced compared to the control
complex suggesting a better stacking of bases induced by
the incorporation of the aepipPNA modification. Only
in the case of the complex 7:14 where the aepip modifi-
cation is in the center of the sequence, was the percent
hyperchromicity accompanying the melting found to be
lower than the control. The formation of stable com-
plexes with the aepipPNA was further confirmed by a
nondenaturing gel shift assay (Fig. 2) in which the DNA
band exhibited characteristic retardation upon forma-
tion of the complex with PNAs. The ssPNAs alone
moved much more slowly compared to the complexes.
Acknowledgements
P.S.S. thanks DST and CSIR, New Delhi for a research
fellowship. V.A.K. thanks DST, New Delhi, for research
grants.
References and notes
1. (a) Hyrup, B.;Nielsen, P. E. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.
1996, 4, 5–23;(b) Ganesh, K. N.;Nielsen, P. E. Curr. Org.
Chem. 2000, 4, 916–928.
2. Egholm, M.;Buchardt, O.;Christensen, L.;Behrens, C.;
Freier, S. M.;Driver, D. A.;Berg, R. H.;Kim, S. K.;
Norden, B.;Nielsen, P. E. Nature 1993, 365, 566–568.
3. Uhlmann, E.;Peyman, A.;Breipohl, G.;Will, D. W.
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 2796–2823.
4. Koppelhus, U.;Nielsen, P. E. Adv. Drug Delivery Rev.
2003, 55, 267–280.
5. (a) DÕCosta, M.;Kumar, V. A.;Ganesh, K. N. Org. Lett.
1999, 1, 1513–1516;(b) D ÕCosta, M.;Kumar, V. A.;
Ganesh, K. N. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 1281–1284;(c) D ÕCosta,
M.;Kumar, V. A.;Ganesh, K. N. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68,
4439–4445;(d) Kumar, V. A. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2002,
2021–2032;(e) Sharma, N.;Ganesh, K. N. Chem. Com-
mun. 2003, 2484–2485.
6. (a) Vilaivan, T.;Lowe, G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124,
9326–9327;(b) Hickman, D. T.;King, P. M.;Cooper, M.
A.;Slater, J. M.;Mickelfield, J. Chem. Commun. 2000,
2251–2252;(c) Puschl, A.;Boesen, T.;Zuccarello, G.;
Dahl, O.;Pitsch, S.;Nielsen, P. E. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66,
707–712.
7. Bailey, P. D.;Bryans, J. S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1988, 29,
2231–2234.
8. Adams, D. R.;Bailey, P. D.;Heffernan, J. H.;Stokes, S.
Chem. Commun. 1996, 349–350.
9. Fields, G. B.;Fields, C. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113,
4202–4207.
In summary, the substitution of the six-membered
aepipPNA monomer into the aegPNA backbone in-
creased the Tm of the derived complexes with DNA. This