Arch. Pharm. Pharm. Med. Chem. 2003, 336, 573–584
1,2-Dihydroisoquinolines as Carriers for Specific Brain Delivery 583
1,2-Dihydro-2- (isopropoxycarbonylmethyl)isoquinoline (3 d)
scanned in the 270–37 nm range. Data obtained was analyzed
as mentioned above to determine the concentration of the DH-
compound and its quaternary form at various intervals.The re-
maining DH concentration or formed quaternary salts were cal-
culated and the apparent pseudo first order rate constants of
oxidation (Kdisap., min.–1) of the tested compound calculated as
the average of 3 experiments. Results are given in Table 4.
A brown oily product result in 59 % yield by method A and 70 %
by method B.
1H-NMR (CDCl3):1–1.3 (d, J = 2.1, 6 H, CH(CH3)2), 3.9 (s, H, N-
CH2), 4.4 (s, 2 H, isoqunoline C1H2), 5–5.4 (m, 1 H CH(CH3)2),
7–7.5 (m, 6 H, isoquinoline).
Theoretical calculations
MO calculations
References
The MOPAC 6/PC version 6.12 package program was used.
The program was obtained from Quantum Chemistry Program
Exchange project (QCPE), Department of Chemistry, Indiana
University, USA. Structures studied were generated using
PCMODEL program which was obtained from Serena Soft-
ware, USA. MMX molecular mechanics was performed with
PCMODEL minimization of the energy of these compounds.
The resulting files obtained from PCMODEL were introduced to
MOPAC program for AM1 calculation of the heat of formation
(∆Hf, Kcal/mole) in gaseous phase. These calculations were
carried out on an IBM PIV 333 Processor, 124Ram computers.
[1] N. Bodor, Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 1994, 14, 157–166.
[2] N. Bodor, M. E., Brewster, Pharmacol. Ther. 1983, 19,
337–386.
[3] D. J. Begley, J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 1996, 48, 136–146.
[4] N. Bodor, H. Farag, J. Pharm. Sci. 1984, 73, 385–389.
[5] K. S. Choi, G. A. Alivisatos, Biochemistry, 1968, 7, 190–
197.
[6] E.Pop, M.E.Brewster, M.J.Hung, N.Bodor, J. Mol. Struct.
(Theochem) 1995. 337, 49–55.
Calculation of log P values
The log P values of synthesized derivatives were computed
with a routine method called “calculated log P” (C log P) con-
tained in a PC-software package (MacLogP 2.0, BioByte Corp.,
CA, USA). A representation of the molecular structure where
hydrogens are omitted, or “suppressed” (SMILES notation),
was entered into the program, which computed log P based on
the fragment method developed by Leo [38].
[7] S.L. Johnson, P.T.Tuazon, Biochemistry 1977, 16, 1175–
1183.
[8] D. M. Stout, A. I. Meyers, Chem. Rev. 1982, 82, 223.
[9] E.Pop, W.Wu, E.Shek, N.Bodor, J.Med.Chem. 1989, 32,
1774–1781.
[10] W.Wu, E.Pop, E.Shek, N.Bodor, J.Med.Chem.,1989, 32,
UV spectral measurements
1782–1788.
Standard solutions for multivariate calibration
[11] E. Pop, Z. Liu, J. Vlasak, W. Anderson, M. E. Brewster, N.
Bodor, Drug Del. 1993, 1, 143–149.
To obtain the calibration matrix for applying CLS analysis, six
solutions of each of the pure compounds (2 b–d and 3 b–d)
were prepared with concentrations in the range 10–60 µg/mL.
This range was previously verified to obey Beer’s law for each
of the compounds studied in the selected solvent (methanol).In
order to obtain the calibration K matrix, absorption data in the
range of 270–370 nm (digitized every 1.0 nm) were subjected
to least squares analysis (see below). Laboratory mixtures
were then prepared by mixing known amounts of DH-deriva-
tives, 3 b–d, with their corresponding Q-forms, 2 b–d, in varied
proportions, in order to verify the precision of the method for
analysis of such mixtures and determination of DH-compound
oxidation rates, as well as the rate of formation of correspond-
ing quaternary ammonium salts.
[12] A. G. Anderson, G. Berkehammer, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1958, 80, 992–999.
[13] M. A. Abo-Elnile, Master Thesis, Assuit University, Egypt,
1997.
[14] K. Mahalanabis, D. Basu, Analyst 1989, 114, 1311–1314.
[15] H. C. Goicoechea, A. C. Olivieri, Analyst 1999, 124, 725–
731.
[16] C. Demir, R. G. Brereton, Analyst 1998, 123, 181–189.
[17] N. Capitan-Vallvey, M. Kalil, A. Deheidel, I. de Orbe, R.
Avidad, Analyst 1999, 124, 49–53.
Data processing
[18] M.J. Benito, M. C. Ortiz, M. S. Sanchez, L. A. Sarabia, M.
Iniguez, Analyst 1999, 124, 547–552.
Data was processed on an Intel Pentium III 750 MHz PC-com-
patible computer. The relative root mean squared error
(RRMSE) was chosen to compare the different models:
[19] J. A. Hernandez-Arteseros, R. Compano, R. Ferrer, M. D.
Prat, Analyst 2000, 125, 1155–1158.
[20] J. Keay in Advance in Heterocyclic Chemistry, (Ed.: A.
Katritzky), Academic Press Inc., NewYork, NY 1986, Vol.
39, pp. 33–35.
2
ˆ
Σ(Ci – Ci)
RRMSE (%) = 100 ×
s
ΣC2i
[21] Y. Kikugawa, M. Kuramoto, I. Satio, S. Yamado, Chem.
Pharm. Bull. 1973, 21, 1914–1926.
compound in standard or sample solutions.
[22] H.Schmid, P.Karrer, Helv.Chim.Acta, 1949, 32, 960–966.
Oxidation with silver nitrate
[23] P.Karrer, F.Kahnt, R.Epstein,W.Jaffe,T.Ishii, Helv.Chem.
Acta 1938, 21, 223–236.
To 3 sets of tubes (each containing 5 mL of AgNO3 reagent), 1
mL of stock solutions of tested DH-derivatives (3 b–d) was add-
ed at ambient temperature. At time intervals (5, 10, 15, 30, 40,
60 min), samples were removed, centrifuged, filtered and
[24] A.Nuvole, G.Paglietti, P.Sanna, R.M.Achesson, J.Chem.
Res. 1984, Supplement, 356–357.
© 2003 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim