we report a facile, highly regio- and stereoselective method
for the synthesis of N-tosyl allylic amines directly from allylic
alcohols via divalent palladium-catalyzed intramolecular
allylic substitution.
examples of facile reduction of Pd(II) to Pd(0).2c,7 However,
it is inconsistent with the fact that the control experiment
only in the presence of Pd(OAc)2 without LiBr in DMF gave
no reaction. In addition, in a parallel study, when compound
1a (1 mmol) was subject to a Pd catalytic system (Pd(OAc)2
(0.05 mmol)) in the presence of LiBr (4 mmol) and CuBr2
(8 mmol) in DMF (5 mL), 3a was the sole product in 98%
yield. Furthermore, the reaction of 1a (1 mmol) could
proceed with Pd(OAc)2 (0.05 mmol) and LiBr (4 mmol)
without the presence of CuBr2 in DMF (5 mL) at room
temperature to produce 3a in 95% yield. No reaction occurred
in the absence of Pd(II) catalyst even at 100 °C. These
observations led us to believe that the reaction is actually
catalyzed by Pd(II) instead of Pd(0).
In our laboratory, we have developed a series of regio-
and stereoselective reactions based on Pd(II)-mediated nu-
cleopalladation of alkynes and tandem carbon-carbon bond
coupling.6 With these previous developments, we explored
the intramolecular nucleopalladation of alkenes by nitrogen
nucleophiles and wished to achieve a tandem nucleopalla-
dation-conjugate addition reaction (Scheme 2, a). However,
Scheme 2
To further clarify the reaction mechanism, we studied the
substitution reaction with O-[but-(2Z)-enyl]tosylcarbamate
(1b) (Scheme 3). From 1b (1 mmol), a Pd(0) [Pd(OAc)2,
Scheme 3
when we attempted the reaction of 1a (0.1 mmol) with
acrolein (1.5 mmol) in the presence of Pd(OAc)2 (0.005
mmol) and LiBr (0.5 mmol) in THF, we only obtained the
compounds 3a (yield: 57%) and 4 (yield: 30%) instead of
2. The formation of 4 may be explained by the direct Michael
addition of 1a to acrolein; but the formation of 3a was
somewhat unexpected in Pd(II)-catalyzed reactions. Usually,
the transformation of 1a to 3a could be speculated by a
Pd(0)-catalyzed allylic cleavage followed by decarboxylation
and nucleophilic substitution by tosylamide anion. This
appeared a reasonable supposition in light of the numerous
(0.05 mmol), PPh3, (0.2 mmol)]7 catalyzed allylic substitution
leads to 3b and (E)-3e as the main products together with a
minor amount of unidentified product.8 While under
Pd(OAc)2-LiBr catalysis, only the γ-substituted product 3b
was isolated in 96% yield.
It is significant that the N-tosyl carbamates can be prepared
in situ from the corresponding allylic alcohols9 and undergo
allylic substitution without isolation. For example, allyl
alcohol 5a (1 mmol) reacted with TsNCO (1.1 mmol) in THF
for 20 min; after THF was removed, the catalytic reaction
was carried out in DMF in the presence of Pd(OAc)2 (0.05
mmol) and LiBr (4 mmol). This procedure afforded 3a in
96% yield. A wide range of 1-, 3-substituted or 1,3-
disubstituted (Z)-allylic alcohols were examined under the
same conditions (Scheme 4, Table 1), and they all gave
exclusively the γ-substitution products.10
(5) (a) Tetsuo, T.; Horii, Y.; Nakagawa, Y.; Ishida, T.; Saegusa, T. J.
Org. Chem. 1989, 54, 977. (b) Tanikaga, R.; Takeuchi, J.; Takyu, M.; Kaji,
A. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1987, 386. (c) Geneˆt, J. P.; Balabane,
M.; Ba¨ckvall, J. E.; Nystro¨m, J. E. Tetrahedron Lett. 1983, 27, 2745. (d)
Tsuji, J.; Ueno, H.; Kobayashi, Y.; Okumoto, H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1981,
22, 2573. (e) Inami, H.; Ito, T.; Urabe, H.; Sato, F. Tetrahedron Lett. 1993,
34, 5919. (f) Urade, H.; Inami, H.; Sato, F. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun.
1993, 1595. (g) Tsuji, J.; Yuhara, M.; Minato, M.; Yamada, H.; Sato, F.;
Kobayashi, Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 1988, 29, 343. (h) Hirao, T.; Enda, J.;
Ohshiro, Y.; Agawa, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1981, 22, 3079. (i) Trost, B. M.;
Self, C. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1983, 105, 5942. (j) Kang, J.; Cho, W.; Lee,
W. K. J. Org. Chem. 1984, 49, 1838.
(6) (a) Lu, X.; Zhu, G.; Wang, Z. Synlett 1998, 115. (b) Lu, X.; Ma, S.
New Age of Divalent Palladium Catalysis. In Transition Metal Catalyzed
Reaction; Murahashi, S-I., Davies, S. G., Eds.; 1999; Chapter 6, p 133. (c)
Ma, S.; Lu, X. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1990, 733. (d) Ma, S.; Lu,
X. J. Org. Chem. 1991, 56, 5112. (e) Ma, S.; Zhu, G.; Lu, X. J. Org. Chem.
1993, 58, 3692. (f) Ma, S.; Lu, X. J. Organomet. Chem. 1993, 447, 305.
(g) Ma, S.; Lu, X. J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 1245. (h) Zhu, G.; Ma, S.; Lu,
X. J. Chem. Res. (S) 1993, 367. (i) Zhu, G.; Lu, X.; Organometallics 1995,
14, 4899. (j) Zhu, G.; Lu, X. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 1087.
Scheme 4
(7) (a) Amatore, C.; Jutand, A.; M’Barki, M. A. Organometallics
1992, 11, 3009. (b) Ozawa, F.; Kabo, A.; Hayashi, T. Chem. Lett. 1992,
2177. (c) Hayashi, T.; Kubo, A.; Ozawa, F. Pure Appl. Chem. 1992, 64,
421.
2358
Org. Lett., Vol. 2, No. 15, 2000