590
BOLDYREV, MOLOTKOVSKY
other hand, the interaction of solvent dipoles with ester A, B); mp 93–94°C (from chloroform–hexane); MS,
1
m/z: 290 [M]+; H NMR (CDCl3): 0.89 (3 H, t, J 7.1,
CH3), 1.28 [16 H, broad m, (CH2)8CH3], 1.76 (2 H, m,
COCH2CH2), 2.41 (2 H, t, J 7.6, COCH2), 3.86 [bs,
(NH2)], 6.81 (2 H, d, J 7.1, arom. H), 7.07 (1 H, t, J 7.8,
arom. H), 7.10 (1 H, bs, NH), and 7.19 (1 H, d, J 8.3,
arom. H).
group leads to a decrease in the electron-acceptor effect
and an increase in the quenching presumably by the
TICT mechanism (see the table). Amide (XII) has sat-
isfactory chemical and photostabilities: its alcoholic
solution does not undergo a marked degradation in the
dark at room temperature for more than 15 days (TLC)
and irradiation of its hexane solution with the excitation
light in a fluorimeter (see the Experimental section) for
1 h does not change its emission spectrum.
We believe that the parameters of (XII) (fluores-
cence parameters, the dependence of Φ value on the
polarity of medium, stability, and a convenient method
of synthesis) allow its use for the design of fluorescent
probes suitable for studying biological systems.
4-Dodecanoylaminophenylamine
(V)
was
obtained as described for (IV) by a reaction of a solu-
tion of 1,4-phenylenediamine dihydrochloride (0.7 g,
3.9 mmol) and N-ethyldiisopropylamine (1 ml) in chlo-
roform (25 ml) with dodecanoyl chloride (0.22 g);
chromatographically homogeneous cream-white pow-
der; yield 20%; Rf 0.5 (80 : 17 : 1 chloroform–ethyl ace-
tate–methanol; A, B); mp 150–153°C (sintered at about
140°ë, from chloroform–hexane); MS, m/z: 290 [M]+.
EXPERIMENTAL
Anthroylamides (general procedure). 9-
Anthracenecarboxylic acid chloride (1.5 equiv) was
added to a stirred solution of an aromatic amine or a
derivative (IV) or (V) (0.2–1 µmol) and N-ethyldiiso-
propylamine (3–5 equiv) in dry chloroform (5–15 ml).
The mixture was stirred until the complete dissolution,
allowed to stand for 2 days, diluted with ethyl acetate,
treated with water, and intensively stirred for 6 h. Then
it was twice washed with water and a saturated NaCl
solution (10 ml each), and dried with Na2SO4. The tar-
get substance was isolated from the extract by column
chromatography on silica gel in a step gradient of ethyl
acetate in benzene or chloroform (99 : 1 to 9 : 1) mon-
itoring the separation by TLC (detection A–C). In this
manner, there were obtained:
We used dodecanoyl chloride, DBU, N-ethyldiiso-
propylamine, and ethyl p-aminobenzoate from Fluka
(Switzerland), 9-anthracenecarboxylic acid and 1,4-
phenylenediamine dihydrochloride from Merck (Ger-
many), and the other reagents and solvents from Rea-
khim (Russia). Dry chloroform was obtained by distil-
lation over phosphorus pentoxide, other solvents were
used after the purification by usual procedures. Kiesel-
gel 60 (Merck, Germany) was used for column chroma-
tography. Precoated plates with fluorescent indicator
(Kieselgel 60 F254) and without the indicator (Kieselgel
60) were from (Merck, Germany). Substance spots
were detected by phosphomolybdic acid (A), ninhydrin
(B), and by visualization under UV light (C).
Anthracene-9-carboxylic acid chloride was obtained by
boiling of the acid with thionyl chloride excess in chlo-
roform containing 0.05% DMF; mp 95–98°ë
(decomp., from chloroform–toluene). Methyl 11-(9-
anthroylamino)undecanoic acid (VII) was synthesized
as described previously [3].
9-Anthracenecarboxylic acid 4-methylphenyla-
mide (VIII); yield 40%; Rf 0.5 (19 : 1 benzene–ethyl
acetate, A, C); mp 202–205°ë (with sublimation, from
chloroform–methanol); MS, m/z: 311 [M]+, 205
1
[ë14ç9ëé]+; H NMR (CDCl3): 2.40 (3 H, s, CH3),
7.26 (2 H, d, J 8.6, arom. H), 7.53 (4 H, m, arom. H),
7.64 (1 H, bs, NH), 7.67 (2 H, d, J 8.6, arom. H), 8.05
(2 H, d, J 8.1, arom. H), 8.19 (2 H, d, J 8.1, arom. H),
and 8.54 (1 H, s, arom. H).
Mass spectra were measured under the electron
impact ionization (70 eV) on a SSQ-710 instrument
(Finnigan MAT, United States); UV spectra, on a
Ultraspec II spectrophotometer (LKB, Sweden); fluo-
rescence spectra, on a Hitachi F-4000 spectrofluorime-
9-Anthracenecarboxylic acid 4-methoxypheny-
lamide (IX); yield 35%; Rf 0.4 (19 : 1 benzene–ethyl
acetate, A, C); mp 219–222°ë (from chloroform–meth-
1
ter (Japan); and H NMR spectra (δ, ppm, relative
Me4Si, spin coupling constants, J, Hz), on a Bruker
1
anol); MS, m/z: 327 [M]+, 205 [ë14ç9ëé]+; H NMR
WM 500 spectrometer (Germany).
(CDCl3): 3.77 (3 H, s, CH3), 6.89 (2 H, d, J 10.9, arom.
H), 7.43 (4 H, m, arom. H), 7.51 (1 H, bs, NH), 7.60
(2 H, d, J 10.9, arom. H), 7.95 (2 H, d, J 10.6, arom. H),
8.09 (2 H, d, J 10.6, arom. H), and 8.44 (1 H, n,
arom. H).
2-Dodecanoylaminophenylamine (IV). A solution
of dodecanoyl chloride (0.22 g, 1 mmol) in chloroform
(1 ml) was added in five portions at 5-min intervals to a
solution of 1,2-phenylenediamine (0.52 g, 4.2 mmol)
and N-ethyldiisopropylamine (0.2 ml) in dry chloro-
form (10 ml). The solution was kept for 12 h, diluted
with ether (100 ml), washed with water (3 × 15 ml),
dried with Na2SO4, and evaporated. Chromatography
9-Anthracenecarboxylic acid 2-dodecanoylami-
nophenylamide (X); yield 70%; Rf 0.55 (83 : 15 : 2
benzene–ethyl acetate–acetic acid, A, C); mp
151−153°ë (from chloroform–methanol); MS, m/z:
494 [M]+, 476 [M – H2O]+, 311 [M – C11H23CO]+, 293
on a silica gel column eluted with 5
10% ethyl ace-
tate in chloroform led to pure (IV) as a white powder
1
[M – C11H23CO – H2O]+, 205 [ë14ç9ëé]+; H NMR
homogeneous according to TLC; yield 152 mg (52%);
Rf 0.7 (80 : 17 : 1 chloroform–ethyl acetate–methanol; (CDCl3): 0.89 (3 H, t, J 6.8, CH3), 1.22 [16 H, bm,
RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF BIOORGANIC CHEMISTRY Vol. 30 No. 6 2004