Chemistry Letters Vol.33, No.5 (2004)
517
60% yield along with 6% of a dimer and 30% of recovered se-
co-acid 8. Although deprotection of the tosyl group of 10 with so-
dium naphtalenide at ꢁ40 ꢃC in DME took place smoothly, the
product of the reaction was unfortunately, undesired lactam 11
generated by intramolecular acyl migration. So, trans-lactoniza-
tion10 of 11 was carried out by treatment with p-toluenesulfonic
(b)
(a)
(%, %ee)
100
(%, %ee)
100
OH OH
OH OH
Ph
Ph
Ph
Ph
Ph
Ph
Ph
Ph
80
60
40
20
0
80
60
40
20
O
O
O
O
1a
1b
20
: recovery of guest (%)
: optical yield (%ee)
: recovery of guest (%)
: optical yield (%ee)
acid to yield 3 as a pale yellow oil, ½ꢀꢄ D ꢁ44:0 (c 0.47, MeOH),
whose physical properties compared well with those in the litera-
25
ture ½ꢀꢄ
þ50:8 (c 1.36, MeOH)].11c
D
0
0
0
20
40
60
80
100
20
40
60
80
100
H2O (%)
H2O (%)
O
O
CN
a, b
c, d
OH
Figure 2. Solvent dependence of chemical and optical yields of 2b recov-
ered from the solid phase. (a): 2bꢂ1a (b): 2bꢂ1b.
O
Z
5
4
91% ee, by GLC
93% ee
e
Z / E = 94 / 6
siderations: 1) In order to ensure high optical purity, the recovery
of guest molecules is sacrificed to some extent by filtration. 2) In
order to increase the optical purity further, the solid phase ob-
tained by the filtration, a mixture of the host and the optically en-
riched guest molecules, is suspended again into fresh solvent
without a base. That is, the mixture is subjected to optical resolu-
tion by inclusion recomplexation. 3) It is important that the choice
of the H2O–MeOH ratio influences considerably the efficiency of
the new procedure.
TBDMSO
CN
HO
g
f
CO2H
N
N
Ts
Ts
7
8
O
O
OH
h
O
O
O
N
N
N
Ts
H
11
10
(R)-epilachnene (3)
Actually, a 7:3 mixture of H2O–MeOH (shown as a vertical
line in Figure 2b) was chosen as a solvent for improved deracem-
ization of 2b with 1b. The suspension of 2b (50 mg, 0.36 mmol),
host compound 1b (186 mg, 0.36 mmol), and sodium hydroxide
(1.4 mmol) in H2O–MeOH (5 mL) was stirred at room tempera-
ture for 2 days. The mixture was filtered and the residue was
washed with H2O–MeOH (7:3, 1 mL 3 times). The resulting res-
idue, the solid phase, was suspended again into a fresh mixture of
H2O–MeOH (7:3, 5 mL) at ambient temperature for 1 day. After
filtration followed by washing with H2O–MeOH (7:3, 1 mL 3
times), the residue was dissolved in ether and subjected to gas
chromatography (GC) to afford 93% ee of (R)-2b in 70% yield
(Scheme 3).7 Thus, the value of E increased to 130%.
total 15% yield (10 steps)
Scheme 4.a
a
Reagent and Conditions: (a) H2, Pd/C, NaHCO3, ether; (b) m-CPBA,
NaH2PO4, CH2Cl2, rt, quant. (2 steps); (c) DIBAL, CH2Cl2; (d)
Ph3Pþ(CH2)4CN Brꢁ, sodium dimsylate, DMSO, rt, 30 min, 70% (2 steps);
(e) 6 (1.5 equiv.), CMMP (1.5 equiv.), tol., rt, 24 h, 91%; (f) KOH, EtOH,
95 ꢃC, 18 h, quant.; (g) 9, NEt3, MeCN, reflux, 30 min, 60%; (h) i) Na,
C10H8, DME, ꢁ40 ꢃC, 0.5 h, ii) p-TsOH, tol., 80 ꢃC, 4 h, 56%.
Thus, since the solubility of the guest molecule into a media
has a significant impact upon the efficiency of the deracemization,
we are continuing further investigation to obtain highly optically
active ꢀ-substituted cycloalkanones and to reveal the detailed na-
ture of the molecular recognition process affected by the media.
host (1 equiv.)
filt. solid
filt. solid
filtrate
NaOH (4 equiv.)
References and Notes
( ) - 2b
(R) - 2b
H2O / MeOH
rt, 2 days
H2O / MeOH
rt, 1 day
1
2
H. Kaku, S. Takaoka, and T. Tsunoda, Tetrahedron, 58, 3401 (2002).
T. Tsunoda, H. Kaku, M. Nagaku, and E. Okuyama, Tetrahedron Lett., 38,
7759 (1997), and references cited therein.
filtrate
3
4
5
H. Kaku, S. Ozako, S. Kawamura, S. Takatsu, M. Ishii, and T. Tsunoda,
Heterocycles, 55, 847 (2001).
D. Seebach, A. K. Beck, R. Imwikelried, S. Roggo, and A. Wonnacott,
Helv. Chim. Acta, 70, 954 (1987).
Resolution efficiency (E, %) = yield(%) ꢅ enantiomeric excess(% ee) ꢅ
2/100. In the case of optical resolution, the value of E never exceed the
100%. See, K. Sakai, R. Sakurai, A. Yuzawa, and N. Hirayama, Tetrahe-
dron: Asymmetry, 14, 3713 (2003).
Scheme 3.
A 2-g-scale reaction of racemic 2b was successfully achieved
in a 67:33 mixture of H2O–MeOH (200 mL) to give 93% ee of
(R)-2b in 72% yield. When a 70:30 mixture was used, the optical
yield of (R)-2b decreased down to 80% ee. This finding proved
that solvent composition has a significant impact upon the effi-
ciency of the deracemization.
In order to demonstrate the usefulness of the improved dera-
cemization, 3 was synthesized using (R)-2b (93% ee) as the start-
ing material (Scheme 4). First, (R)-2b was converted to lactone 4
by hydrogenation — Baeyer–Villiger oxidation sequence. DIBAL
reduction of 4 followed by Wittig reaction gave hydroxy nitrile 5,
which was subjected to Mitsunobu-type reaction with N-[2-(t-bu-
tyldimethylsilyloxy)ethyl]tosylamide (6) in the presence of cya-
nomethylenetrimethylphosphorane (CMMP)8 to yield sulfona-
mide 7 with Walden inversion at the carbinol stereocenter of 5.
Hydrolysis of the nitrile 7 provided seco-acid 8, which was suc-
cessfully cyclized by the reaction of 2-chloro-1-methylpyridinium
iodide (9)9 under high dilution conditions to afford lactone 10 in
6
7
A. B. Attygalle, K. D. McCormick, C. L. Blankespoor, T. Eisner, and
J. Meinwald, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 90, 5204 (1993).
In a small-scale reaction, the yield of recovered (R)-2b was determined by
GC on a Shimadzu GC-15A instrument using a J&W Scientific DB-1 capil-
lary column. Dodecane was employed as an internal standard. The enantio-
meric excess of the ketone was determined by GC using a chiral column
(SUPELCO, ꢀ-DEX120).
ˆ
T. Tsunoda, C. Nagino, M. Oguri, and S. Ito, Tetrahedron Lett., 37, 2459
8
9
ˆ
(1996); T. Tsunoda and S. Ito, J. Synth. Org. Chem. Jpn., 55, 631 (1997);
S. Ito and T. Tsunoda, Pure Appl. Chem., 71, 1053 (1999); I. Sakamoto,
ˆ
H. Kaku, and T. Tsunoda, Chem. Pharm. Bull., 51, 474 (2003).
T. Mukaiyama, M. Usui, and K. Saigo, Chem. Lett., 1976, 49.
10 G. W. Gribble and R. A. Silva, Tetrahedron Lett., 37, 2154 (1996).
11 a) B. V. Rao, V. S. Kumar, M. Nagarajan, D. Sitaramaiah, and A. V. R. Rao,
Tetrahedron Lett., 37, 8613 (1996). b) J. J. Farmer, A. B. Attygalle, S. R.
Smedley, T. Eisner, and J. Meinwald, Tetrahedron Lett., 38, 2787
(1997). c) J. J. Farmer, F. C. Schroeder, and J. Meinwald, Helv. Chim. Acta,
83, 2594 (2000).
Published on the web (Advance View) March 30, 2004; DOI 10.1246/cl.2004.516