Fig. 1 MALDI-TOF mass spectra for the products from (S)- (a) and (R)-
Scheme 3 Synthesis of (R)-g-[3-2H1]butyrolactone (13). Reagents and
conditions: (i) PMB–Cl, NaH, Bu4NI, DMF, 0 ? 25 °C, N2, 2 h; (ii)
CH2CHMgBr, Li2CuCl4, THF, 278 ? 25 °C, N2, 18 h; (iii) CH3SO2Cl,
Et3N, CH2Cl2, 0 °C, 30 min; (iv) LiAlD4, THF, reflux, N2, 48 h; (v)
Hg(OAc)2, THF, H2O, 25 °C, 2 h, then NaBH4, NaOH, H2O, 5 ? 25 °C, 1
h; (vi) Dess–Martin periodinane, CH2Cl2, 25 °C, 3 h; (vii) NaOH, Br2, H2O,
dioxane, 15 °C, 2 h; (viii) DDQ, CH2Cl2, H2O, 0 °C, 3 h.
4-hydroxy[3-2H1]butyryl-CoA (b).
Fig. 2 Stereospecific loss of the pro-(S) hydrogen atom from 4-hydrox-
ybutyryl-CoA.
perruthenate oxidation) of the vinyl group to acid 12 proved
problematic in the presence of the p-methoxybenzyl group, but was
eventually achieved efficiently by an indirect route involving
oxymercuration,6 Dess–Martin oxidation7 and bromoform8 reac-
tion. On deprotection of the hydroxyl group, spontaneous cyclisa-
tion occurred to afford (R)-g-[3-2H1]butyrolactone (13), which is a
convenient form of 4-hydroxybutyric acid for purification and
analysis. The (S)-enantiomer of g-[3-2H1]butyrolactone was ob-
tained by a similar route, starting with (S)-glycidol. For the
enzymatic experiments, the g-[3-2H1]butyrolactones were con-
verted to 4-hydroxy[3-2H1]butyrates with 1 M NaOH solution. The
synthesis of 4-hydroxybutyryl-CoA esters was performed using
100 mM labelled 4-hydroxybutyrate in 100 mM potassium
phosphate pH 7.4, 2.5 mM acetyl-CoA and 4-hydroxybutyrate
CoA-transferase (3 U ml21) in a total volume of 0.5 ml. After
incubation at ambient temperature for 10 min, the completeness of
the conversion was checked in an assay using 5,5A-dithiobis(2-
nitrobenzoate) (DTNB), oxaloacetate and citrate synthase; subse-
quently, acetate and 4-hydroxybutyrate CoA-transferase were
added.9 The CoA esters were purified using a C18 cartridge, eluting
with 50% aqueous acetonitrile containing 0.1% TFA. The CoA
esters from (R)- and (S)-4-hydroxy[2-2H]butyrates showed one
major peak by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry with the same mass
of 855 Da.
The CoA esters were incubated with 4-hydroxybutyryl-CoA
dehydratase for 15 min at 37 °C and the CoA-containing products
separated with a C18 cartridge as described above. MALDI-TOF
mass spectrometry was used to analyse the products, an equili-
brated mixture of 4-hydroxybutyryl-CoA and crotonyl-CoA. The
spectra show masses of 854 and 836, respectively, for the (S)-
enantiomer and 855 and 837, respectively, for the (R)-enantiomer
(Fig. 1). The (R)-isomer therefore lost its 1H (proton at C-3),
whereas the (S)-isomer lost its 2H (deuteron at C-3).
It has thus been demonstrated that the dehydration of 4-hydrox-
ybutyryl-CoA proceeds with the stereospecific removal of the pro-
(S) hydrogen atom from the C-3 position of the substrate (Fig. 2).
The hydrogen (deuterium) removed is not returned to C-4,
indicating that the base that removes H(D) from C-3 either does not
return the abstracted atom to C-4 or only does so after exchange
with solvent. Work is in progress to determine the stereochemistry
of hydrogen removal/addition at C-2 and C-4. These results will aid
the positioning of the substrate/product in the active site of
4-hydroxybutyryl-CoA dehydratase, whose crystal structure is
currently under investigation.10 Initial results show that the
structure is very similar to that of medium chain acyl-CoA
dehydrogenase,11 even though there is only 16% sequence identity.
Interestingly, acyl-CoA dehydrogenases show the same ster-
eospecificity at C-3 as 4-hydroxybutyryl-CoA dehydratase.12
We thank the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft and the Euro-
pean Community Human Potential Programme (Contract HPRN-
CT-2002-00195) for support of this research.
Notes and references
1 U. Scherf and W. Buckel, Eur. J. Biochem., 1993, 215, 421; A.
Gerhardt, I. Çinkaya, D. Linder, G. Huisman and W. Buckel, Arch.
Microbiol., 2000, 174, 189.
2 W. Buckel and B. T. Golding, FEMS Microbiol. Rev., 1999, 22, 523.
3 D. M. Smith, W. Buckel and H. Zipse, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2003, 42,
1867.
4 H. C. Brown and S. Krishnamurthy, J. Org. Chem., 1980, 45, 849.
5 J. S. Chickos, M. Bausch and A. Rushdi, J. Org. Chem., 1981, 46,
1981.
6 H. C. Brown, P. J. Geoghegan Jr., G. J. Lynch and J. T. Kurek, J. Org.
Chem., 1972, 37, 1941.
7 D. B. Dess and J. C. Martin, J. Org. Chem., 1983, 48, 4155.
8 For a review, see: S. K. Chakrabartty, in Oxidation in Organic
Chemistry, Part C, ed. W. S. Trahanovsky, Academic Press, New York,
1978, p. 343.
9 U. Scherf and W. Buckel, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 1991, 57, 2699.
10 B. M. Martins, H. Dobbek, I. Çinkaya, W. Buckel and A. Messer
Schmidt, manuscript in preparation.
11 J. J. Kim and J. Wu, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 1988, 85, 6677.
12 L. Bücklers, A. Umani-Ronchi, J. Rétey and D. Arigoni, Experientia,
1970, 26, 931; J. F. Biellmann and C. G. Hirth, FEBS Lett., 1970, 9, 335;
H. J. LaRoche, M. Kellner, H. Günther and H. Simon, Hoppe Seyler’s
Z. Physiol. Chem., 1971, 352, 399.
C h e m . C o m m u n . , 2 0 0 4 , 1 2 1 0 – 1 2 1 1
1211