Bailey et al.
JOCArticle
SCHEME 2
a rather modest 60-80% for all of the reactions studied
(Table 1). Clearly, lithium-bromine exchange is not an
efficient process in hydrocarbon-ether mixtures at 0 °C.
The rather high proportion of (E)-5-decene (3) in the product
mixtures was unanticipated. Were the lithium-bromine
exchange to proceed with retention of configuration, via a
10-Br-2-ate intermediate or transition state,15 (Z)-5-decenyl-
lithium would result and the product, following quench with
MeOH, would be (Z)-5-decene (2). Given that a vinyllithium
generated under the conditions used for the reactions summar-
ized in Table 1 (15 min at 0 °C) is expected to be configura-
tionally stable,16 it would seem that lithium-bromine exchange
with retention of configuration is not the exclusive route
followed in these reactions. The results are consistent with an
exchange that proceeds, at least in part, via single-electron
transfer (SET) from the t-BuLi to the vinyl bromide substrate
to give a vinyl radical intermediate17 (Scheme 3). Vinyl radicals
are known to invert rapidly18 and, for this reason, an exchange
proceeding by SET would be expected to result in at least
partial isomerization of the vinyllithium product. The fact that
the relative proportions of (Z)-5-decene (2) and (E)-5-decene
(3) are roughly constant (viz. 2/3∼4) for all reactions except for
those conducted in a medium containing significant amounts of
2-methyltetrahydrofuran (Table 1, entries 9 and 10; 2/3 ∼ 9) is
consistent with this rationale.
TABLE 1. Reactions of (E)-5-Bromo-5-decene (1) with t-BuLi at 0 °C in
Various Solvents (Scheme 2)
products,a %
entry
solvent
2
3
4
5
6
1
1
heptane
2.3 tr
1.3 0.5 95.1
2
heptane-Et2O (99:1 by vol)
heptane-Et2O (19:1 by vol)
heptane-Et2O (9:1 by vol)
heptane-THF (99:1 by vol)
heptane-THF (19:1 by vol)
heptane-THF (9:1 by vol)
72.9 16.0 8.0 1.8 1.3
71.3 17.0 6.3 2.2 2.8 tr
66.8 17.5 8.3 1.7 1.4
72.7 17.2 6.7 1.6 2.0
69.0 17.5 6.9 1.5 1.5
66.0 20.2 7.6 1.9 3.2
3
4
5
6
7
8
heptane-MeTHFb (99:1 by vol) 83.8 10.6 2.5 1.3 0.8 tr
heptane-MeTHFb (19:1 by vol) 80.8 8.0 6.9 1.5 1.8 tr
heptane-MeTHFb (9:1 by vol) 77.4 9.6 7.4 1.7 2.2 tr
9
10
11
12
13
heptane-MTBE (99:1 by vol)
heptane-MTBE (19:1 by vol)
heptane-MTBE (9:1 by vol)
71.1 16.5 6.6 1.6 tr
2.4
67.7 21.9 4.9 2.6 1.3 tr
62.0 27.2 4.6 2.6 3.4
aYields were determined by capillary GC; tr indicates that a trace
(viz. < 0.2%) of material was detected. b2-Methyltetrahydrofuran.
mass spectra to those of authentic samples; (Z)-4-decene (4)
was identified on the basis of its reported GC retention time
and EI mass spectrum.11 It might be noted that the allene,
4,5-decadiene, whose mass spectra has been reported,12 was
not observed as a product of any of the reactions. The results
of these experiments are summarized in Table 1.
The formation of small quantities of alkyne 5 in these
reactions is almost certainly the result of an elimination of
HBr from the vinyl bromide substrate. The observation of
minor but non-negligible quantities of (Z)-4-decene (4) as a
product of these reactions is more problematic. The fact that
only the Z- isomer is observed (a control experiment, using a
commercial sample containing both (Z)-4-decene and (E)-4-
decene, demonstrated that both isomers could be detected by
the GC method used for analysis of reaction mixtures) suggests,
as illustrated in Scheme 4, that (Z)-4-decene (4) was generated
by protonation of an allyllithium intermediate: the U-shaped
geometry of the 1,3-dialkylallyl anion depicted in Scheme 4 is
Inspection of the data presented in Table 1 reveals that
t-BuLi in heptane is, for all intents and purposes, unreactive;
95% of the starting bromide (1) is recovered (Table 1, entry
1). Given that t-BuLi is known to exist as a tetrameric
aggregate in hydrocarbon solvent,13 it would appear that
the tetrameric species does not participate effectively in the
lithium-bromine exchange. However, the presence of even
small quantities (viz, 1% by vol) of an ether (Et2O, THF,
2-methyltetrahydrofuran,14 or MTBE) in a predominantly
heptane medium resulted in virtually complete consumption
of the vinyl bromide (Table 1, entries 2, 5, 8, and 11).
Moreover, and somewhat surprisingly, addition of any of
the ethers used in this study, in any proportion from 1 to 10%
by volume, led to nearly the same product distribution. The
yield of (Z)-5-decenyllithium, assayed as (Z)-5-decene (2), is
(15) Wiberg, K. B.; Sklenak, S.; Bailey, W. F. Organometallics 2001, 20,
771.
€
(16) (a) Knorr, R.; Lattke, E.; Rapple, E. Chem. Ber. 1981, 114, 1581.
(b) Lattke, E.; Knorr, R. Chem. Ber. 1981, 114, 1600. (c) Knorr, R.; Lattke, E.
Chem. Ber. 1981, 114, 2116. (d) Walborsky, H. M.; Banks, R .B. Bull. Soc.
Chim. Belg. 1980, 89, 849. (e) Hoedt, R. W. M. T.; Van Koten, G.; Noltes,
J. G. J. Organomet. Chem. 1979, 170, 131. (f) Seyferth, D.; Vaughn, L. G.
J. Organomet. Chem. 1963, 1, 201. (g) Hoedt, R .W. M. T.; Van Koten, G.;
Noltes, J. G. J. Organomet. Chem. 1978, 161, C13. (h) Curtin, D. Y.; Koehl,
W. J., Jr. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1962, 84, 1967. (i) Panek, E. J.; Neff, B. L.; Chu,
H.; Panek, M. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1975, 97, 3996. (j) Curtin, D. Y.; Crump,
J. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1957, 80, 1922. (k) Seyferth, D.; Vaughn, L. G.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1964, 86, 883. (l) Knorr, R.; Lattke, E. Tetrahedron Lett.
1977, 18, 3969.
(11) National Institute of Standards and Technology Chemistry WebBook,
(accessed December 2009).
(12) Back, T. G.; Krishna, M. V.; Muralidharan, K. R. J. Org. Chem.
1989, 54, 4146.
(13) (a) Brown, T. L. Acc. Chem. Res. 1968, 1, 23. (b) Thomas, R. D.;
Clarke, M. T.; Jensen, R. M.; Young, T. C. Organometallics 1985, 5, 1851.
(14) 2-Methyltetrahydrofuran, which is only partially soluble in water,
has been used as a solvent for a variety of organometallic reactions; it reacts
more slowly with organolithium reagents than does THF: see (a) Aycock,
D. F. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2007, 11, 156. (b) Bates, R. J. Org. Chem. 1972,
37, 560.
(17) Bailey, W. F.; Patricia, J. J. J. Organomet. Chem. 1988, 352, 1.
(18) Fressenden, R. W.; Schuler, R. H. J. Chem. Phys. 1963, 39, 2147.
J. Org. Chem. Vol. 75, No. 8, 2010 2663