EFFECT OF SUBSTITUENT IN DIAZOTIZED ORTHANILIC ACID
1099
solution was adjusted to pH 9.0 by adding 40%
aqueous NaOH, and the mixture was heated to 60 C.
Freshly distilled dimethyl sulfate, 20 ml, was added
over a period of 5 h under vigorous stirring; during
the addition, the initial pH value was maintained
intermittently by adding 20% aqueous NaOH. The
mixture was kept for 12 h, and the fine crystals were
filtered off, washed with 100 ml of water, and dried.
was combined with the washings and acidified with
hydrochloric acid (Congo Red). The precipitate was
filtered off, washed with water (2 50 ml), recrystal-
lized first from 0.1 N hydrochloric acid and then from
water, and dried at 60 C. Yield 13.1 g (70%), color-
1
less finely crystalline powder. IR spectrum, , cm :
1250 (SO2, asym.), 1060 (SO2, sym). Anilinium salt
C7H9NO3S C6H7N: mp 235 239 C (from 96%
ethanol); published data [9]: mp 237 241 C.
1
Yield 22 g (90%). IR spectrum, , cm : 1250 (SO2,
asym.), 1050 (SO2, sym.). UV spectrum (water),
nm (log ): pH 1.0: 350 (4.16); pH 11.0: 350 (4.17).
,
max
2-Amino-5-chlorobenzenesulfonic acid (II).
A 7.5-ml portion of 92% sulfuric acid was added with
stirring to 16.7 g of 4-chloroaniline (see above). The
salt was sulfonated by sintering at 170 180 C over
a period of 5 h. The end of the reaction was deter-
mined as described above. Removal of unreacted
4-chloroaniline and isolation and purification of
2-amino-5-chlorobenzenesulfonic acid were performed
following the procedures described above for
2-amino-5-methylbenzenesulfonic acid. Yield 25.2 g
2-Amino-5-methoxybenzenesulfonic acid (IV).
Sodium
5-methoxy-2-(phenylazo)benzenesulfonate,
20.0 g, was dissolved in 300 ml of water heated to
80 85 C, 22.0 g of Na2S2O4 was added, and the
mixture was stirred for 30 min (until it became
colorless), heated to 90 95 C, and kept for 10 15 min
at that temperature. The mixture was cooled to 35
40 C and extracted with benzene until the extracts no
longer contained aniline. The aqueous phase was
acidified to pH 5.0 with hydrochloric acid, and the
precipitate was filtered off, washed with 50 ml of
0.1 N hydrochloric acid and 50 ml of water, and
recrystallized from water. Yield 6.3 g (51%) of
chromatographically pure compound IV. Further
acidification of the filtrate obtained after separation
of the first portion gave an additional 2.7 g (22%) of
1
(60%), light grey crystals. IR spectrum, , cm : 1250
(SO2, asym.), 1060 (SO2, sym). Anilinium salt
C6H6NO3S C6H7N, mp 210 212 C (from 96%
ethanol); published data [10]: mp 211 212 C.
REFERENCES
1. Kornev, K.A. and Zheltov, A.Ya., Russ. J. Gen.
Chem., 1998, vol. 68, no. 7, p. 1147.
the producta containing a little of impurities. 1H NMR
spectrum, , ppm: 7.17 d (1H, 6-H), 6.89 d.d (1H,
4-H), 6.71 d (1H, 3-H), 5.47 br.s (NH2), 3.65 s
(3H, CH3).
2. Kornev, K.A. and Zheltov, A.Ya., Russ. J. Gen.
Chem., 1999, vol. 69, no. 6, p. 962.
3. Zollinger, H., Helv. Chim. Acta, 1953, vol. 36,
2-Amino-5-methylbenzenesulfonic acid (III).
A 5.6-ml portion of 95% sulfuric acid was slowly
added with stirring to 10.7 g of 4-methylaniline. The
salt thus obtained was ground and uniformly applied
to the bottom of a round-bottom flask. The flask was
immersed into a metal bath heated to 90 100 C, and
water was distilled off under reduced pressure (water-
jet pump). The bath temperature was slowly raised to
170 180 C, and the mixture was kept for 3 h at that
temperature. The end of the process was determined
by dissolution of a sample of the mixture in 10%
aqueous NaOH (the solution should be homogeneous,
and it should not contain appreciable amounts of
4-methylaniline). The mixture was cooled to 60 70 C,
10% aqueous NaOH was added until alkaline reaction
(phenolphthalein), and the mixture was heated to 90
95 C and was stirred until it became homogeneous.
A small amount of unreacted 4-methylaniline was
removed from the solution by steam distillation. The
solution was cooled to 70 80 C, 1 g of charcoal was
added, the mixture was stirred for 30 min and quickly
filtered on a Buchner funnel, and the charcoal was
washed on a filter with 15 ml of hot water. The filtrate
p. 1730.
4. Štérba, V. and Valter, K., Coll. Czech. Chem.
Commun., 1972, vol. 37, p. 1327.
5. Kishimoto, S., Manabe, O., Hiyama, H., and
Hirao, N., Nippon Kagaku Kaishi, 1972, no. 11,
p. 2132.
6. Zhdanov, Yu.A. and Minkin, V.I., Korrelyatsionnyi
analiz v organicheskoi khimii (Correlation Analysis
in Organic Chemistry), Rostov-on-Don: Rostov. Gos.
Univ., 1966.
7. Spravochnik khimika (Chemist’s Handbook), Nikol’-
skii, B.P., Ed., Moscow: Khimiya, 1964, vol. 3,
p. 171.
8. Preparatyka Organiczna, Polaczkowa, W., Ed.,
Warsaw: Techniczne, 1954. Translated under the title
Preparativnaya organicheskaya khimiya, Moscow:
Khimiya, 1964, p. 471.
9. Scott, J.R. and Cohen, J.B., J. Chem. Soc., 1921,
vol. 121, p. 2039.
10. Scott, J.R. and Cohen, J.B., J. Chem. Soc., 1923,
vol. 123, p. 3190.
RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF GENERAL CHEMISTRY Vol. 73 No. 7 2003