Scheme 1
Scheme 2
differ only in the C-terminal substituents. We report here
findings using ynamides 4 in Sonogashira couplings as an
approach to conjugated phenylacetylenic systems.
The feasibility of Sonogashira coupling was readily
established as shown in Scheme 2. We did not observe here
homocoupling of ynamide 9, which is an urethane-based
ynamide, as reported in the literature for sulfonyl-substituted
ynamides.2c,8 The coupling reaction of ynamide 9 with
iodobenzene using 10 mol % of Pd(Ph3P)4 and 7 mol % of
CuI in i-Pr2NH/toluene (2:1) at room temperature led to the
formation of the desired phenyl-substituted ynamide 1014 in
93% yield (Scheme 2). Although both CuCN and CuI appear
to be feasible for the Sonogashira coupling, as expected,
iodobenzene coupled much faster than bromobenzene.15
The generality of this Sonogashira coupling with various
aryl iodides is displayed in Table 1. The main features are
except two independent documentations of unsuccessful
attempts.2c,8 As an alternative, Saa´8 did report recently the
use of zinc sulfonamido-acetylides, generated in situ from
â,â′-dichloro-enamides, in Negishi-type couplings. However,
the Sonogashira protocol still represents the most efficient
and straightforward cross-couplings of any terminal alkynes.6,7
These cross-coupling reactions should lead to the preparation
of conjugated systems9 such as 7 and 8 that can be useful in
developing new materials given the significance of conju-
gated rigid rods molecular electronics9,10 and self-assembly.11-13
In addition, although the copper-catalyzed amidation of
alkynyl iodides4,5 is a viable approach for constructing these
ynamides, a successful Sonogashira coupling would provide
not only a complimentary protocol but also, more impor-
tantly, an entry that is more versatile and practical when one
intends to design and synthesize a library of ynamides that
Table 1.
(6) (a) Sonogashira, K.; Tohda, Y.; Hagihara, N. Tetrahedron Lett. 1975,
16, 4467. For reviews on Heck couplings, see: (b) Hegedus, L. S.
Tetrahedron 1984, 40, 2415.
(7) For reviews, see: (a) Collman, J. P.; Hegedus, L. S.; Norton, J. R.;
Finke, R. G. In Principles and Applications of Organotransition Metal
Chemistry; University Science Books: Mill Valley, CA, 1987. (b) Negishi,
E. Handbook of Organopalladium Chemistry for Organic Synthesis; Wiley-
Interscience: New York, 2002; Vol I, p 7. (c) Sonogashira, K. Cross-
coupling reactions to sp carbon atoms. In Metal-Catalyzed Cross-Coupling
Reactions; Diederich, F., Stang, P. J., Eds.; Wiley-VCh: New York, 1998;
pp 203-229.
(8) During our pursuit of Sonogashira couplings, Saa´ reported an
alternative Negishi coupling of sulfonyl ynamides and also documented
the lack of feasibility in related Sonogashira coupling. See: Rodr´ıguez,
D.; Castedo, L.; Saa´, C. Synlett 2004, 783.
(9) For reviews, see: (a) Ahmed, H. J. Vac. Sci. Technol., B 1997, 15,
2101. (b) Petty, M. C.; Bryce, M. R.; Bloor, D. Introduction to Molecular
Electronics; Oxford University Press: New York, 1995. (c) Molecular
Electronics and Molecular Electronic DeVices; Sienicki, K., Ed.; CRC
Press: Boca Raton, 1992; Vols. I-III. (d) Mirkin, C. A.; Ratner, M. A.
Molecular electronics. Annu. ReV. Phys. Chem. 1992, 43, 719.
(10) Also see: (a) Wada, Y. Surf. Sci. 1997,386. 265. (b) Reimers, J.
R.; Lu, T. X.; Crossley, M. J.; Hush, N. S. Nanotechnology 1996, 7, 424.
(c) Conjugated Conducting Polymers; Springer Series in Solid-State
Sciences, no. 102; Kiess H., Ed.; Springer-Verlag: Berlin, 1992.
(11) (a) Dubois, L. H.; Nuzzo, R. G. Annu. ReV. Phys. Chem. 1992, 43,
437. (b) Ulman, A. Chem. ReV. 1996, 96, 1533.
a Reactions were carried out using 10 mol % Pd(Ph3P)4 and 7 mol %
copper salt in i-Pr2NH/toluene (2:1) except for entries 1 and 7. b Isolated
yields. c In entries 1 and 7, 10 mol % PdCl2(Ph3P)2 was used. d The same
result as in Scheme 2. e 1-Bromo-1-hexyne was used.
(12) For some recent examples, see: (a) Zhang, J.: Pesak, D. J.; Ludwick,
J. L.; Moore, J. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 4227. (b) Scherf, U.;
Mu¨llen, K. Synthesis 1992, 23. (c) Tour, J. M.; Jones, L., II; Pearson, D.
L.; Lamba, J. J. S.; Burgin, T. P.; Whitesides, G. V.; Allara, D. L.; Parikh,
A. N.; Atre, S. V. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 9529.
(13) (a) Dhirani, A.-A.; Zehner, W. R.; Hsung, R. P.; Guyot-Sionnest,
P.; Sita, L. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 3319. (b) Sandra, S. B.; Dudek,
S. P.; Hsung, R. P.; Sita, L. R.; Smalley, J. F.; Newton, M. D.; Feldberg,
S. W.; Chidsey, C. E. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 10563. (c) Zehner,
R. W.; Parsons, B. F.; Hsung, R. P.; Sita, L. R. Langmuir 1999, 15, 1121.
as follows: (1) PdCl2(Ph3P)2 was less effective in catalyzing
these couplings than Pd(Ph3P)4 (respectively, entry 1 versus
entries 2 and 3 (or see Scheme 2), and entries 7 versus 8),
and thus only Pd(Ph3P)4 was used throughout this study. (2)
(14) Relevant procedures for new compounds and their characterizations
are in Supporting Information.
2210
Org. Lett., Vol. 6, No. 13, 2004