C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Figure 1. PAGE analysis of irradiation (λ > 320 nm, pH 8, time and
treatment indicated) of 5′-32P-labeled 11-mer containing NidA 7 (0.5 µM)
(lanes 1-4, single stranded, and lanes 9-12, double stranded) and of 5′-
32P-labeled 11-mer containing 7Ni 8 (0.5 µM) (lanes 5-8, single stranded,
and lanes 13-16, double stranded). Bands a and b are assigned to secondary
products resulting from piperidine and DTT (present in labeling buffer)
addition on lactone in 9 as observed previously.8
Figure 3. Melting curves of duplex 10 [5 µM]. pH 7 in PO4 buffer (10
mM), [EDTA] ) 1 mM, [NaCl] ) 100 mM. R and Tm values were
determined according to ref 9.
These results show that the nucleoside analogue NidA constitutes
a remarkable photocleavable 2′-deoxyadenosine mimic. It can be
efficiently prepared and introduced into any preselected site in
oligonucleotides. Photocleavage is quantitative and rapid, both in
single and double strands. Its hybridization properties are very
similar to those of the natural adenosine nucleoside. Enzymatic
incorporation in DNA is currently under way.
Acknowledgment. We thank Dr. C. Philouze for crystal-
lographic analysis of NidA, Dr. J.-F. Constant and Dr. N. Berthet
for their assistance with PAGE analysis as well as helpful comments
and discussions regarding these analyses, and Dr. William Moneta
and M. Vincent Steinmez for MS.
Figure 2. Perspective view of the crystallographic structure of NidA
showing the distance between the oxygen of the nitro group and the
anomeric hydrogen.
The 11-mer 5′-d(CGCAC-NidA-CACGC)-3′ 7 was thus prepared
using standard conditions.7 ES-MS analysis of the oligonucleotide
confirmed its structure, which additionally proved the introduction
of the NH2 amino group in the NidA moiety during the last step of
the synthesis (see Supporting Information).
Oligonucleotide 7 was irradiated at λ > 320 nm in dilute aqueous
solution at room temperature. After 60 min, the NidA-containing
oligonucleotide was transformed into the deoxyribonolactone-
containing oligonucleotide 5′-d(CGCAC-dL-CACGC)-3′ 9 that was
characterized by ES-MS (see Supporting Information). Mild pi-
peridine treatment of 9 led to total cleavage of the modified strand
(Figure 1). Quite interestingly, PAGE analysis shows that the photo-
induced cleavage process is also efficient in the double-stranded
state (T facing NidA in the complementary strand). It also reveals
that the process is at least as efficient as that observed for the
previously reported 7Ni-containing oligonucleotide 5′-d(CGCAC-
7Ni-CACGC)-3′ 8.
The efficiency of the photoreaction may be attributed to the
highly favorable conformation of the NidA nucleotide that presents,
at least in the solid state, an anti conformation in which the H-1′
to be abstracted is located at a 2.1 Å distance from the oxygen of
the nitro group (Figure 2).
Hybridization properties of NidA were examined by measuring
the melting temperatures (Tm) of duplex 5′-d(GCGTG-X-GTGCG)-
3′/5′-d(CGCAC-Y-CACGC)-3′10 (Figure 3) X ) T, C; Y ) A,
NidA. Very similar Tm values were determined respectively for
the matched duplexes T:A and T:NidA (Tm ) 59 and 60 °C,
respectively) and for the mismatched duplexes 9 C:A and C:NidA
(Tm ) 46 and 46 °C, respectively). CD spectra of the A- and NidA-
containing oligomers were also similar (see Supporting Informa-
tion).
Supporting Information Available: Detailed synthetic procedures
for 6 and 7, ES-MS and HPLC analyses of 7 and 8, and CD spectrum
of duplex 10 (PDF), as well as X-ray crystallographic data in CIF format
for NidA. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at
References
(1) Armitage, B. Chem. ReV. 1998, 98, 1171-1200.
(2) (a) Peoc’h, D.; Meyer, A.; Imbach, J. L.; Rayner, B. Tetrahedron Lett.
1991, 32, 207-210. (b) Giese, B.; Beyrich-Graf, X.; Erdmann, P.; Petretta,
M.; Schwitter, U. Chem. Biol. 1995, 2, 367-375. (c) Tronche, C.;
Goodman, B. K.; Greenberg, M. M. Chem. Biol. 1998, 5, 263-271. (d)
Zhang, K.; Taylor, J.-S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 11579-11580. (e)
Lenox, H. J.; McCoy, C. P.; Sheppard, T. L. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 2415-
2418. (f) Pirrung, M. C.; Zhao, X.; Harris, S. V. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66,
2067-2071. (g) Dussy, A.; Meyer, C.; Quennet, E.; Bickle, Thomas A.;
Giese, B.; Marx, A. ChemBioChem. 2002, 3, 54-60.
(3) (a) Kotera, M.; Bourdat, A. G.; Defrancq, E.; Lhomme, J. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1998, 120, 11810-11811. (b) Kotera, M.; Roupioz, Y.; Defrancq,
E.; Bourdat, A.-G.; Garcia, J.; Coulombeau, C.; Lhomme, J. Chem.-Eur.
J. 2000, 6, 4163-4169. (c) Roupioz, Y.; Lhomme, J.; Kotera, M. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 9129-9135.
(4) Mizuno, Y.; Itoh, T.; Saito, K. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1964, 12, 866-872.
(5) Kazimierczuk, Z.; Cottam, H. B.; Revankar, G. R.; Robins, R. K. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 6379-6382.
(6) Similar strategies were used for synthesis of modified nucleoside [(a) Zhou,
X. X.; Chattopadhyaya, J. Tetrahedron 1986, 42, 5149-5156] and of
modified oligonucleotides [(b) MacMillan, A. M.; Verdine, G. L. J. Org.
Chem. 1990, 55, 5931-5933].
(7) We used prolonged coupling time (15 min), double the amount of amidite
and activator reagents, and five times the amount of capping reagents.
Under these conditions, high coupling yield (>95% by trityl assay) was
achieved.
(8) (a) Hwang, J.-T.; Tallman, K. A.; Greenberg, M. M. Nucleic Acids Res.
1999, 27, 3805-3810. (b) Zheng, Y.; Sheppard, T. L. Chem. Res. Toxicol.
2004, 17, 197-207.
(9) Marky, L. A.; Breslauer, K. J. Biopolymers 1987, 26, 1601-20.
JA047976M
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 126, NO. 31, 2004 9533