Scheme 3. 2-Deoxy Phosphates from Glycosyl Chloridesa
Table 1. Effect of Solvent and Nucleophile on Glycosyl
Phosphate Formation
entry donor product solvent
nucleophilea
â/Rb (yield)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
6c
7d
6c
6c
6c
7d
6c
8
8
8
8
8
8
9
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
toluene
TBAP
TBAP
TBAP
2:1 (56%)
1:2 (51%)
2:1 (48%)
2:1 (54%)
5:1 (58%)
4:1 (52%)
2:1 (54%)
CH3NO2 TBAP
CH3CN
CH3CN
CH3CN
TBAP
TBAP
TDP Bu4N-salt
a TBAP ) Bu4NH2PO4. b â/R-ratios were determined by 1H NMR.
c DIPEA (pH > 7), 3 Å molecular sieves, 0 °C f rt, 3 h. d DIPEA (pH >
7), 3 Å molecular sieves, -30 °C f rt, 3 h.
a Reaction conditions: Bu4NH2PO4, CH3CN, 0 °C to rt.
Table 1 shows the stereochemical outcome of glycosyla-
tion of tetrabutylammonium dihydrogen phosphate (Bu4NH2-
PO4, TBAP) with chloride 6 and bromide 7. A correlation
between increased â-selectivity (2:1 vs 1:2) in the formation
of phosphate 8 and increasing stability of the donor (Cl >
Br) was observed in dichloromethane (entries 1 and 2).
Variation of the solvent polarity did not have a significant
effect on the stereochemical outcome, as evidenced by the
fact that nitromethane (entry 4) gave comparable results to
dichloromethane and toluene (entry 3). However, when
acetonitrile, which is similar in polarity to nitromethane, was
used as a solvent, the â/R-ratios improved to 5:1 (chloride
6) and 4:1 (bromide 7) (entries 5 and 6). It has previously
been observed that nitriles favor the â-anomer in many
glycosylation reactions, perhaps because nitrile-containing
solvents participate in the reaction, forming an R-nitrilium
ion so that attack from the â-face is favored.13 On the basis
of these model studies, we selected anomeric chlorides as
our donors of choice for further work both because they gave
better â-selectivities and were easier to generate and handle
than the corresponding anomeric bromides.
Having established favorable donor and solvent conditions,
we next examined the use of different phosphate nucleo-
philes.14 Obviously, the most straightforward approach to
sugar nucleotides would be to couple the anomeric chloride
directly to TDP. However, when chloride 6 was coupled with
the tetrabutylammonium salt of TDP, the corresponding
protected TDP sugar 9 could be isolated, but a decrease in
â-selectivity from 5:1 to 2:1 was observed (Table 1, entry
7). Therefore, we decided that better stereochemical control
could be achieved by coupling the glycosyl phosphate to an
activated nucleotide monosphosphate rather than attempting
to install the NDP group in a single step. Under optimized
conditions, coupling of chloride 6 with Bu4NH2PO4 in
acetonitrile gave phosphate 8 (â/R ) 5:1) in 58% yield.15
To explore the utility of the conditions established above,
we prepared the R-chloro derivatives of the five â-2-deoxy
sugars shown in Scheme 3 (see Supporting Information).
Compounds 10 and 12 are precursors of sugar moieties found
in the anthracycline group of antibiotics, e.g., daunomycin
and aclacinomycin A, while 14 is part of tetrocarcin A.
Chlorides 16 and 18 are precursors of epi-vancosamine and
vancosamine, respectively, which are constituents of the
glycopeptide antibiotics chloroeremomycin and vancomycin,
respectively. Each of these 2-deoxy glycosyl chlorides were
subjected to phosphorylation, and the â-phosphate was the
predominant product in all cases, with â/R-ratios ranging
from 5:1 to 9:1.16 Hence, the method reliably produces the
desired â-anomer for a range of 2-deoxy sugars with high
selectivity.
Phosphates 8 (L-acosamine), 11 (L-daunosamine), 13 (2-
deoxy L-fucose), 17 (L-vancosamine), and 19 (L-epi-van-
cosamine) were prepared on a larger scale and converted to
the corresponding TDP derivatives by coupling with TMP
morpholidate5 using the conditions developed by Wong
(Scheme 4).17 The undesired R-isomers could usually be
removed at this stage by careful separation using preparative
reversed-phase HPLC. Deprotection and, for azido-containing
(15) Synthesis of L-Acosaminyl Phosphate 8. To a solution of lactol 5
(216 mg, 1.0 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (10 mL) was added freshly activated
molecular sieves (3 Å, 1.0 g), and the mixture was stirred at room
temperature for 30 min under argon. Then, a catalytic amount of DMF and
oxalyl chloride (2 M in CH2Cl2, 0.6 mL, 1.2 mmol) was added, and stirring
was continued for 1 h. The mixture was filtered, evaporated without heating,
and coevaporated with toluene (three times). The crude glycosyl chloride
was dissolved in CH3CN (10 mL) under argon, and the pH was adjusted to
9 by the dropwise addition of DIPEA. After the addition of freshly activated
molecular sieves (3 Å, 1.0 g), the mixture was cooled (ice bath), and Bu4-
NH2PO4 (0.4 M in CH3CN, 5.0 mL, 2 mmol) was added. The mixture was
stirred for 3 h while warming to room temperature and then filtered and
evaporated. The residue was purified by reversed-phase HPLC (5 min with
H2O/0.1% NH4HCO3 and then a linear gradient to 100% MeOH/0.1% NH4-
HCO3 over 50 min; flow rate ) 45 mL/min). Evaporation of the product-
containing fractions (Rf ) 0.30, CH2Cl2/MeOH/H2O/Et3N 8:4:0.2:0.3) gave
the ammonium salt of 8 as a white powder upon lyophilization (180 mg,
58%, â/R 5:1, based on 1H NMR). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CD3OD): δ 5.55
(m, 1 H, 1-HR), 5.21 (ddd, J1,P ) 8.0, J1,2a ) 2.2, J1,2b ) 9.6 Hz, 1 H,
1-Hâ). For complete NMR data, see Supporting Information.
(13) Schmidt, R. R.; Behrendt, M.; Toepfer, A. Synlett 1990, 694-696.
(14) When protected phosphates, e.g., dibenzyl phosphate, were used in
the coupling reaction, the products proved to very labile and difficult to
purify. Consistent with this observation, phosphoramidite coupling of lactol
6 ((1) iPr2NP(OBn)2, tetrazole; (2) mCPBA) did not generate the dibenzyl
phosphate.
(16) When a daunosaminyl chloride carrying a 3-NHCbz group instead
of the 3-N3 function was used in the coupling reaction, a decrease in
â-selectivity was observed. Therefore, azido derivatives were used for all
nitrogen-containing 2-deoxy sugars.
(17) Wittmann, V.; Wong, C.-H. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 2144-2147.
Org. Lett., Vol. 6, No. 17, 2004
2875