0022-5347/02/1682-0420/0
®
THE JOURNAL OF UROLOGY
Vol. 168, 420–424, August 2002
Copyright © 2002 by AMERICAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION, INC.®
Printed in U.S.A.
Milestone in Urology
ASYMPTOMATIC INFECTIONS OF THE
URINARY TRACT*
By EDWARD H. KASS
(Introduced by)
MAXWELL FINLAND
BOSTON, MASS.
(From the Thorndike Memorial Laboratory and Second and Fourth
(Harvard) Medical Services, Boston City Hospital, and the Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School)
(Reprinted with permission from Trans Am Physiol, 69: 56–64, 1956)
Infections of the urinary tract are second in frequency disappears with dilution. The significance of this indica-
only to infections of the respiratory tract. Yet, despite their tion of the presence of an inhibitor to bacterial multiplica-
relative frequency, and their apparent association, sup- tion in urine remains to be explored. In general, however,
ported by varying degrees of evidence, with such diverse
clinical states as hypertension, malignant nephrosclerosis,
toxemias of pregnancy, diabetes mellitus, our knowledge of
the incidence and pathogenesis of such infections is incom-
plete, and methods for their control seriously inade-
quate.1, 2
Several observers have found pyelonephritis in 12 to 20
per cent of autopsies; such pyelonephritis had been diag-
nosed during life in only about one-fifth of these cases.3, 4, 5
The discrepancy between the clinical and autopsy findings
seems too great to be accounted for on the basis of failure
to recognize the generally accepted clinical manifestations
of infection of the urinary tract. Alternatively, it may be
suggested that there is a high incidence of clinically atyp-
ical or inapparent infections of the urinary tract in the
population at large. The latter possibility has been inves-
tigated.
Initial observations were directed toward the problem of
determining by quantitative bacteriologic study whether it is
possible to distinguish contamination attendant upon the
collection procedure from actual multiplication of bacteria
within the urinary tract.
Several considerations suggest that contamination and
true bacilluria may be distinguished by counting the number
of bacteria in the urine.
When strains of the common pathogens of the urinary
tract are cultured in vitro in pooled specimens of sterile
urine, the bacteria generally grow readily to about 108
bacteria per ml. Even without added glucose, urine gener-
ally supports multiplication of the usual pathogens of the
urinary tract about as well as does nutrient broth, and
variations in pH and specific gravity within physiologic
ranges exert but slight effects on bacterial multiplication.
Occasional pools of urine, acidified to pH 5.0, are inhibi-
tory to bacterial multiplication but the inhibitory effect
bacteria growing in urine tend to multiply to maximal or
near maximal numbers after a sufficient time.
A similar phenomenon probably occurs in vivo. When the
urines of patients with symptoms generally recognized as
those of acute pyelonephritis, namely, chills, fever, flank pain
and dysuria, are examined by quantitative methods the num-
bers of bacteria in the urine are comparable to those found
after in vitro cultivation. Twenty-five consecutive patients
with shaking chills, fever, flank pain and dysuria were stud-
ied and all had more than 100,000 bacteria per ml. of their
urines; all but one had more than one million bacteria per ml.
Thus, the finding of large numbers of bacteria in the urine
suggests that bacteria had actually multiplied within the
urinary tract.
When the urines of female patients were collected by
catheterization, the numbers of bacteria found were dis-
tributed in parabolic fashion (Figure 1). Female medical
out patients were chosen at random, using no criteria for
selection other than that they were not regarded, by those
responsible for their care, as having active infections of the
urinary tract, and in this sense they, and other patients in
this study, are considered to be asymptomatic.
The data presented in Figure 1 indicate that there are
two separate but overlapping population groups. One
group, with bacterial counts between 0 and 10,000, pre-
sumably represents the range of contamination. The sec-
ond group, with more than 100,000 bacteria, would be
expected to encompass those in whom actual multiplica-
tion of bacteria had occurred. The two population groups
overlap at about 10,000 bacteria per ml. Thus, among 74
patients in whom the diagnosis of pyelonephritis was made
or suspected 95 per cent were found to have more than
100,000 bacteria per ml. of urine, and an additional 3 per
cent of this group had between 10,000 to 100,000 per ml.
Conversely, asymptomatic diabetic women and women
who were about to undergo surgery for repair of cystoceles
usually had less than 10,000 bacteria per ml. However, in
these groups, as might be expected, there were relatively
more patients whose urines contained more than 100,000
bacteria than were found in the unselected general group.
It is apparent that the number of bacteria found at either
end of the distribution pattern is a function of the population
groups under study. Patients with manifest or suspected
* Supported by a grant from the National Institutes of Health.
The studies reported here were carried out with the assistance of
Miss Joanne Colburn and Miss Virginia Agrella. Various aspects
of the reported observations were studied in collaboration with
Drs. Thomas W. Mou, Egon Riss, Howard Levitin and Robert
Dandrow. The cooperation of Dr. Benjamin Tenney, Director of
Gynecology and Obstetrics, and Dr. David Hurwitz, Chief of the
Diabetes Clinic of the Boston City Hospital is gratefully acknowl-
edged.
420