C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Scheme 1. Predictive Model
rearrangement. This scheme has the potential to be a very effective
method for the enantioselective synthesis of 1,1-diarylalkyl deriva-
tives, units which have been incorporated into various pharmaceuti-
cal agents.5
The formal C-H activation can be applied to a range of
substrates. Both 7-methoxy- and 6-methoxy-4-methyl-1,2-dihy-
dronaphthalene 14 are suitable substrates to form 15, but the reaction
is more efficient with 14a because with 14b competing benzylic
C-H activation occurs to a minor extent (eq 7).
front side and over the vinyl portion of the carbenoid,3a which is
necessary for occurrence of the combined C-H activation/Cope
rearrangement to form 22. A retro-Cope rearrangement of 22
through a chair transition state would generate a formal C-H
insertion product 23 of defined stereochemistry. The assigned
stereochemistry for the other products is assumed on the basis of
this predictive model. The high diastereoselectivity is an indication
that very little direct C-H activation is occurring,2d in contrast to
our previous diastereoselective examples of the combined C-H
activation/Cope rearrangement.3c
In summary, we have described herein a highly diastereoselective
and enantioselective method for the C-H functionalization of
dihydronaphthalenes. The actual mechanism of the reaction is
complicated and involves a combined C-H activation/Cope rear-
rangement followed by a retro-Cope rearrangement. Dihydronaph-
thalenes such as 8 and naphthylaryl derivatives such as 13 are very
useful chirons, whose application in organic synthesis is currently
under investigation. These studies further demonstrate the broad
synthetic utility of donor/acceptor-substituted rhodium carbenoid
intermediates.
The reactions with 4-siloxy-1,2-dihydronaphthalenes 16 are very
interesting transformations because the products 17 can be formally
considered to be equivalent to the Michael addition products with
the keto tautomer of 1-naphthol, clearly an impossible transforma-
tion (eq 8). Interestingly, the increase size of the silyl group does
not affect the diastereoselectivity, but only slightly drops the ee.
The silyl enol ethers can be easily deprotected by using HCl (for
17a) or HF (for 17b and 17c) to form 18 in a range of 84-99%
yield.
Acknowledgment. This work was supported by the National
Science Foundation (CHE-0350536). We thank Oksana O. Gerlits
for the X-ray crystallographic analysis.
Supporting Information Available: Full experimental data for the
compounds described in this paper, 1H and 13C spectra of selected
compounds, and X-ray structure of p-bromophenyl derivative of 18
(PDF). This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://
pubs.acs.org.
The reaction can also be extended to 2H-chromene derivative
19 (eq 9). Once again, a very selective reaction occurs to form the
C-H activation product 20 in 75% yield, 95% ee, and >98% de
(eq 9).
References
(1) Davies, H. M. L.; Beckwith, R. E. J. Chem. ReV. 2003, 103, 2861-2903.
(2) (a) Davies, H. M. L.; Venkataramani, C.; Hansen, T.; Hopper, D. W. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 6462-6468. (b) Davies, H. M. L.; Beckwith,
R. E. J.; Antoulinakis, E. G.; Jin, Q. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 6126-
6132. (c) Davies, H. M. L.; Jin, Q.; Ren, P.; Kovalevsky, A. Y. J. Org.
Chem. 2002, 67, 4165-4169. (d) Davies, H. M. L.; Ren, P. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2001, 123, 2070-2071. (e) Davies, H. M. L.; Venkataramani, C.
Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 1773-1776. (f) Davies, H. M. L.; Ren, P.; Jin, Q.
Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 3587-3590.
(3) (a) Davies, H. M. L.; Stafford, D. G.; Hansen, T. Org. Lett. 1999, 1, 233-
236. (b) Davies, H. M. L.; Satfford, D. G.; Hansen, T.; Churchill, M. R.;
Keil, K. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 2035-2038. (c) Davies, H. M.
L.; Jin, Q. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2004, 101, 5472-5475.
(4) Cesati, R. R.; De Armas, J.; Hoveyda, A. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004,
126, 96-101.
(5) Bolshan, Y.; Chen, C.-Y.; Chilenski, J. R.; Gosselin, F.; Mathre, D. J.;
O’Shea, P. D.; Roy, A.; Tillyer, R. D. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 111-114.
(6) The X-ray crystallographic data have been submitted to the Cambridge
Structure Database [Gerlits, O. O.; Coppens, P. Private communication
(1078), 2004, CCDC 237040].
The relative and absolute configuration of the p-bromo derivative
of 18 was determined by X-ray crystallography,6 while the
configuration of 10 was confirmed by its conversion to 18. The
observed configuration is consistent with the previously demon-
strated stereochemistry of the combined C-H activation/Cope
rearrangement,3a,c followed by the retro-Cope rearrangement oc-
curring through the expected chair transition state (Scheme 1).7 In
this model, the catalyst is considered to exist in a D2-symmetric
arrangement and can be simply viewed as having two blocking
groups as indicated in 21.8 The substrate is approaching from the
(7) (a) Nubbemeyer, U. Synthesis 2003, 961-1008. (b) Lutz, R. P. Chem.
ReV. 1984, 84, 205-247.
(8) Nowlan, D. T., III; Gregg, T. M.; Davies, H. M. L.; Singleton, D. A. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 15902-15911.
JA047185K
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 126, NO. 35, 2004 10863