1908
M. El-Kemary et al. / Spectrochimica Acta Part A 79 (2011) 1904–1908
H'-2,H'-6
for Hꢀ-3 and Hꢀ-5 is about 0.03. Methyl group protons overlapped
H-6
H'-3,H'-5
with H-2 and H-4 ˇ-CD protons with approximate upfield shift of
0.01 ppm. Therefore, we can conclude that the upfield shift of Parac-
etamol protons together with ˇ-CD protons confirm tight inclusion
of Paracetamol inside ˇ-CD cavity.
P.... -CD
P
4. Conclusions
6.9
7.0
7.1
7.2
7.3
The Paracetamol molecule forms inclusion complexes with CDs
(ˇ-CD, Me-ˇ-CD and HP-ˇ-CD). The stoichiometry of the complexes
is 1:1. The stability constants determined by spectrofluorometric
method. The stability constant with Me-ˇ-CD is higher than with ˇ-
CD and HP-ˇ-CD owing to the extension of the hydrophobic depth
of the cavity. The difference in the stability constants between HP-
ˇ-CD and ˇ-CD may be ascribed to the stronger hydrogen bonding
between Paracetamol and HP-ˇ-CD than the ˇ-CD. Solid inclusion
complexes with ˇ-CD or HP-ˇ-CD and drug can be obtained by co-
precipitation and their formation has been probed by using FTIR
1H NMR and X-ray diffraction techniques.
H-1
H-3
H-5
H-4
H-2
3.75
3.50
4.00
5.00
5.25 ppm
Fig. 5. 1H NMR spectra of ˇ-cyclodextrin (ˇ-CD), Paracetamol (P) and their mixture
(P. ˇ-CD) in D2O.
Acknowledgement
tion peaks at 3402 cm−1 (OH stretching H-bonded), 2929 cm−1 (OH
stretching), 1648 cm−1 (OH bending), 1353 cm−1 (OH deforma-
tion), 1243 cm−1 (CH bending), 1160 cm−1 (COC stretching and OH
gen bonding.
The chemical shift of ˇ-CD protons reported by different authors
was very close to those in this work 0.05 ppm [7,8 and references
therein]. It is well known that the H-3 and H-5 protons are located
in the interior of the ˇ-CD’s cavity and it is, therefore, likely that
the inclusion of Paracetamol with ˇ-CD will specifically affect the
chemical shifts of these two protons. The addition of Paracetamol
to ˇ-CD causes an upfield shift of ˇ-CD spectrum (Fig. 5). The 1H
NMR spectrum of Paracetamol–ˇ-CD shows that the signals due
to H-1, H-2 and H-4 are upfield shifted by about 0.007, 0.005 and
0.02 ppm, respectively, with similar amount of shifts as observed
for other systems [7,8]. The signal due to H-3 is upfield shifted by
about 0.05 ppm while the unresolved band becomes resolved with
a maximum for H-6 is slightly shifted by less than 0.009 ppm while
that for H-5 is upfield shifted by about 0.07 ppm. That assignment
for H-5 protons is based on the fact that H-3 and H-5 are located in
the interior of the cavity and therefore is expected to suffer similar
amount of shielding. The upfield shift observed for H-3 and H-5
protons confirm the inclusion inside the cavity.
The authors acknowledge the Kafrelsheikh University for a sup-
porting research grant.
References
[1] M. Davis, M. Brewster, Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 3 (2004) 1023–1035.
[2] S. Monti, S. Sortino, Chem. Soc. Rev. 31 (2002) 287–300.
[3] N. Nandi, K. Bhattacharyya, B. Bagchi, Chem. Rev. 100 (2000) 2013–2045.
[4] M. El-Kemary, J. Organero, L. Santos, A. Douhal, J. Phys. Chem. B 110 (2006)
14128–14134.
[5] M. El-Kemary, I. El-Mehasseb, Talanta 62 (2004) 317–322.
[6] M. El-Kemary, H. El-Gezawy, H. El-Baradie, R. Issa, Spectrochim. Acta A 58
(2002) 495–502.
[7] A. Abdel-Shafi, Spectrochim. Acta A 66 (2007) 732–738.
[8] A.A. Abdel-Shafi, Spectrochim. Acta A 57 (2001) 1819–1828.
[9] M. El-Kemary, A. Douhal, A. Photochemistry and photophysics of cyclodex-
trin caged drugs, in: A. Douhal (Ed.), Cyclodextrin Materials Photochemistry,
Photophysics and Photobiology, Elsevier, 2006 (Chapter 4).
[10] P. Bortolus, S. Monti, Adv. Photochem. 21 (1996) 1–133.
[11] N.S. Moyon, T.S. Singh, S. Mitra, Biophys. Chem. 138 (2008) 55–62.
[12] K. Uekama, T. Irie, in: D. Duchêne (Ed.), Cyclodextrins and Their Industrial Uses,
Editions de Santé, Paris, 1987, pp. 395–439.
[13] C. Rosel, J. Carreno, M. Rodriguez-Baeza, J. Alderetr, Quim. Nova 23 (2000)
749–752.
[14] H. Benesi, J. Hildebrand, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 71 (1949) 2703–2707.
[15] A. Green, E. Miller, J. Guillory, J. Pharm. Sci. (1991) 186–189.
[16] S.K. Mondal, D. Roy, K. Sahu, P. Sen, K. Bhattacharyya, J. Photochem. Photobiol.
A 173 (2005) 334–339.
[17] T. Steiner, W. Saenger, Carbohydr. Res. 275 (1995) 73–82.
[18] C.J. Easton, S.F. Lincoln, Modified Cyclodextrins, Scaffolds and Templates for
Supramolecular Chemistry, Imperial College Press, London, 1999.
[19] P. Mura, N. Zerrouck, M.T. Faucci, F. Maestrelli, C. Chemtob, Eur. J. Pharm. Bio-
pharm. 54 (2002) 181–191.
[20] O. Abou-Zied, A. Al-Hinai, J. Phys. Chem. A 110 (2006) 7835–7840.
[21] J.E. Hansen, E. Pines, G.R. Fleming, J. Phys. Chem. 96 (1992) 6010–6904.
[22] A. Mun˜oz de la Pen˜a, T. Ndou, J.B. Zung, I.M. Warner, J. Phys. Chem. 95 (1991)
3330–3334.
The 1H NMR spectrum of Paracetamol is shown in Fig. 5 and
reveals that Paracetamol has three types of protons: two doublets
for (Hꢀ-2 and Hꢀ-6) at 7.27 ppm and (Hꢀ-3 and Hꢀ-5) at 6.95 ppm
and singlet of CH3 group is found at 3.61 ppm (Fig. 5). The chemical
shift values given by the Chem-Draw version 8 NMR calculations
show that (Hꢀ-2 and Hꢀ-6) > (Hꢀ-3 and Hꢀ-5). The upfield chemical
shift observed for Hꢀ-2 and Hꢀ-6 doublets is about 0.02 while that
[23] S. Baboota, M. Dhaliwal, K. Kohli, AAPS Pharm. Sci. Technol. 6 (2005) 83–89.