7498
B. E. Blass et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 47 (2006) 7497–7499
The interesting difference in selectivity between these
O
O
two apparently similar ring systems is not easily ex-
plained. One could argue that the 4-imidazolidinone
ring system contains a basic nitrogen that may be pro-
tonated under acidic conditions, thus activating the
N–N bond to reductive cleavage. However, reports
in the literature of successful, selective reduction of
other N-nitroso systems to the corresponding N-amino
compound suggest that protonation alone cannot
explain the difference reported here. The empirical
observation that hydride reagents fail to produce the
desired product, 6, and that hydrogenation conditions
are not selective for nitroso reduction versus N–N bond
cleavage is also a surprising and unexplained result.
O
NH
N
a, b, c, d
H
2
4
Scheme 2. Reagents and conditions: (a) CH3NO2, NH4OAc, AcOH,
reflux, (b) 4-OMe phenethylamine, THF, rt, (c) Zn, HCl, EtOH, (d)
CDI, DMF, 50 ꢁC.
O
O
O
O
NH2
N
N
In summary we have developed a method for the
preparation of the previously unknown 1-amino imidazo-
lidin-4-one and 1-aminoimidazolidin-2-one based struc-
tures from the parent imidazolidinone core in good
yield. We have further demonstrated that the nature of
the reductive conditions employed is critical to the
successful formation of the desired products.
NH
a, b
N
2
5
Scheme 3. Reagents and conditions: (a) NaNO2, AcOH, 25 ꢁC, (b)
AcOH, Zn, 8–15 ꢁC.
References and notes
We then turned our attention to the 4-imidazolidinone
scaffold. While the nitrosation of 1 was accomplished
using similar conditions to the 2-imidazolidinone scaf-
fold, we were surprised to discover that reduction to
the amine was far more difficult. In our hands, the
zinc/acetic acid method employed for the reduction of
the 2-nitroso-2-imidazolidinone was not selective in the
4-imidazolidinone series. The only product observed in
the 4-imidazolidinone class was the original starting
material, 1, a result of reduction of the N–N bond.
Similar results were observed with palladium on carbon
and hydrogen, palladium on alumina and hydrogen, and
titanium trichloride. Further, tin chloride in a variety of
solvents, both with and without microwave irradiation,
left the nitroso compound unchanged. Similar results
were observed with sodium borohydride, sodium cyano-
borohydride, and even lithium aluminum hydride.7 All
of these procedures have been previously reported
to be effective in the reduction of various nitroso
compounds without concomitant reduction of the
N–N bond. To our surprise, the only conditions that
produced reasonable quantities of the desired 1-amino-
imidazolidin-4-one (6) was reduction with zinc dust in
the presence of ammonium chloride at 80 ꢁC for
10 min with microwave irradiation (72%, Scheme 4).8
1. (a) Hudkins, R. L.; Zulli, A. L.; Reddy, D. R.; Gingrich, D.
E.; Tao, M.; Becknell, N. C.; Diebold, J. L.; Underiner, T.
L. U.S. Patent 2005143442, 2005; (b) Goodacfre, C. J.;
Bromidge, L. P.; Clapham, D.; King, F. D.; Lovell, P. J.;
Allen, M.; Campbell, L. P.; Holland, V.; Riley, G. J.; Starr,
K. R.; Trail, B. K.; Wood, M. D. Biorg. Med. Chem. Lett.
2005, 15, 4989–4993.
2. Gong, L.; Wilhelm, R. S. U.S. Patent 2005090504, 2005.
3. (a) Ochiai, H.; Watanabe, Y.; Murotani, Y.; Fukuda, H.;
Yoshino, O.; Minami, S.; Hayashi, T.; Momonoi, K. GB
2233330, 1991; (b) Araujo, M. A.; Born, J.; Capela, R.;
Casimiro, C.; Chambel, P.; Gomes, P.; Iley, J.; Lopes, F.;
Morais, J.; Moreira, R.; Oliveira, E.; Rosario, V.; Vale, N.
J. Med. Chem. 2005, 888–892.
4. Godfrey, J. D., Jr.; Mueller, R. H.; Zahler, R. EP, 1989.
5. Mouhtaram, M.; Jung, L.; Stambach, J. F. Tetrahedron
1993, 49, 1391–1400.
6. Preparation of 5: To a solution of 5-(4-tert-butylphenyl)-1-
[2-(4-methoxyphenyl)ethyl]-2-imidazolidinone (6 g, 17 mmol)
in glacial acetic acid (120 mL), is slowly added a solution of
sodium nitrite (1.52 g, 22 mmol) in water (10 mL). After
30 min, the suspension is cooled to 8 ꢁC, via a water–ice
bath. Zinc (1 g) is added with a rise in temp to 15 ꢁC. A
second portion of zinc (1 g) is added at 8 ꢁC, with a temp
rise to 12 ꢁC. The final addition of zinc (1.3 g, 50 mmol
total) is made at 7.8 ꢁC. The temp is allowed to rise slowly
and the solution is allowed to stir at 12–17 ꢁC for 1 h. The
mixture is cooled in an ice-bath and is diluted with CH2Cl2
(60 mL) and water (25 mL). NH4OH (175 mL) is added,
keeping the temp 627 ꢁC. The CH2Cl2 is separated, and the
aqueous layer is washed with CH2Cl2 (2 · 75 mL). The
combined organics are dried (Na2SO4), and evaporated to
give a colorless oil. The oil is diluted with Et2O (25 mL) and
is cooled in an ice-bath. HCl in Et2O (12 mL, 24 mmol) is
slowly added. Hexanes (10 mL) is slowly added and the
suspension is allowed to stir at room temp overnight. The
suspension is filtered, washed with hexanes, to give the title
compound. Yield: 5.7 g (83%). 1H NMR (DMSO-d6):
d 7.47 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H), 7.33 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H), 7.04
(d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 6.82 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 4.67
O
O
O
O
N
a, b
N
N
NH
NH2
6
1
Scheme 4. Reagents and conditions: (a) NaNO2, AcOH, MeOH, 0 ꢁC,
(b) Zn, NH4Cl, MeOH.