Schiller et al.
consequence of complex formation, 21 has no choice but
to undergo a slow decomposition by an external nucleo-
phile (carbonylation of 14 in MeOH, vide supra) or
remain unchanged in the reaction mixture (carbonylation
of 14 in THF, vide supra). The picture outlined in Scheme
6 complements the conclusions (Scheme 4), valid in those
cases4b,13 where the equilibrium between vinyl- or aryl-
and acylpalladium intermediates exists. In this instance,
decarbonylation is prevented and the rate of CO insertion
versus that of intramolecular carbopalladation governs
the composition of the reaction mixture.
On the other hand, the bis-protected compound 28
offered very low, if any, chance of O to Pd chelation as
well as participation by the ether oxygen as an internal
SCHEME 8. Ca r bon yla tion of Bis-P r otected
Com p ou n d 26
With a view to obtaining further experimental support
for chelate formation, we turned our attention to more
simple vinyl iodides 22, 23, and 28, because they possess
the same structural features giving rise to chelate
formation as 11-14, and subjected them to carbonylation
in both DMF and MeOH under otherwise identical
conditions. Apart from having different protective group
patterns that offer interesting possibilities of complex
formation, the carbonylation of compounds 22 and 23
would furnish 3-hydroxymethylbutenolides, potentially
useful as synthetic intermediates. Compound 23 was
prepared via hydroalumination/iodination of 2-methyl-
6-(tetrahydropyran-2-yloxy)hex-4-yn-3-ol14 (see Scheme
1) and converted into its derivatives 22 and 28 by
standard deprotection and acetylation, respectively. As
expected, carbonylation of iodo alcohols 22 and 23
(Scheme 7) brought further evidence of O to Pd chelation
nucleophile. Accordingly, a slow external trapping of the
acylpalladium intermediate16 with MeOH in a sterically
demanding environment leading to ester 29 was the
predominant pathway both in MeOH and DMF with 10
equiv of MeOH, as shown in Scheme 8.
Some literature results provide further support for the
assumption on the formation of five-membered σ-acylpal-
ladium complexes as intermediates in the Pd-catalyzed
carbonylative lactonizations (Figure 3). Thus, Hegedus
SCHEME 7. Ca r bon yla tion of Bu ten olid e
P r ecu r sor s 22 a n d 23
F IGURE 3. Examples of the formation of five-membered Pd
chelates.
and others17 explored aminocarbonylation of olefins and
showed that Pd forms analogous â-aminoacylpalladium-
(II) chelates (30) through the coordination of N to Pd.
Having been much more stable than the oxygen ana-
logues described herein, the complexes could be isolated
and characterized by X-ray. Closely related σ-alkyl-
palladium complexes were also isolated and character-
ized, if they were part of a five-membered chelate ring.18
In a similar case, Kocˇovsky´ and co-workers19 reported a
convincing example of steering the attack on a double
bond by the precoordination of the metal to a neighboring
OH group (31).
Con clu sion
In summary, we have described the influence of the
free hydroxy function, arising from the complexation of
in Pd-catalyzed reactions: while the formation of complex
26 may occur in both cases, CO insertion is apparently
facilitated through another complex formation (27) only
when the second OH group remains free. Consequently,
carbonylations of diol 22 gave significantly higher yields
of the butenolide product15 than those of 23, and the
reaction of monoprotected compound 23 in MeOH was
synthetically useless, since most of the starting material
underwent decomposition.
(16) In this case, the initially formed alkenylpalladium intermediate
could have been stabilized by the chelation of the carbonyl oxygen to
Pd, even though it should be noted that a seven-membered chelate
ring would thus be formed. This kind of stabilizing effect has been
proposed by Maleczka et al. to explain the regioselectivity of Pd-
mediated hydrostannations of terminal alkynes; see: Rice, B. M.;
Whitehead, S. L.; Horvath, C. M.; Muchnij, J . A.; Maleczka, R. E., J r.
Synthesis 2001, 1495.
(17) (a) Hemmer, H.; Rambaud, J .; Tkatchenko, I. J . Organomet.
Chem. 1975, 97, C57. (b) Hegedus, L. S.; Anderson, O. P.; Zetterberg,
K.; Allen, G.; Siirala-Hansen, K.; Olsen, D. J .; Packard, A. B. Inorg.
Chem. 1977, 16, 1887.
(18) (a) See ref 17a. (b) Hines, L. F.; Stille, J . K. J . Am. Chem. Soc.
1972, 94, 485. (c) Cope, A. C.; Kliegman, M.; Friedrich, E. C. J . Am.
Chem. Soc. 1967, 89, 287. (d) Holton, R. A.; Kjonaas, R. A. J . Am. Chem.
Soc. 1977, 99, 4177. (e) Holton, R. A.; Kjonaas, R. A. J . Organomet.
Chem. 1977, 142, C15.
(19) Kocˇovsky´, P.; Dunn, V.; Gogoll, A.; Langer, V. J . Org. Chem.
1999, 64, 101.
(14) Kimura, M.; Tanaka, S.; Tamaru, I. Bull. Chem. Soc. J pn. 1995,
68, 1689.
(15) Similar â-hydroxyalkylbutenolides were prepared by Hoye et
al. under the Stille carbonylation conditions, see: Hoye, T. R.; Humpal,
P. E.; J ime´nez, J . I.; Mayer, M. J .; Tan, L.; Ye, Z. Tetrahedron Lett.
1994, 35, 7517.
6764 J . Org. Chem., Vol. 69, No. 20, 2004