Structural Volume Changes upon Photoisomerization
J. Phys. Chem. A, Vol. 105, No. 20, 2001 4821
(7) Wegewijs, B.; Verhoeven, J. W.; Braslavsky, S. E. J. Phys. Chem.
1996, 100, 8890-8894.
(8) Wegewijs, B.; Paddon-Row: M. N.; Braslavsky, S. E. J. Phys.
Chem. A 1998, 102, 8812-8818.
(9) Borsarelli, C. D.; Braslavsky, S. E. J. Phys. Chem. B 1998, 102,
6231-6238 and references therein.
(10) Schulenberg, P. J.; Braslavsky, S. E. In Progress in Photothermal
and Photoacoustic Science and Technology; Mandelis, A.; Hess, P., Eds.;
SPIE: Bellingham, WA, 1997; pp 57-81.
(11) Gensch, T.; Hellingwerf, K. J.; Braslavsky, S. E.; Schaffner, K. J.
Phys. Chem. A 1998, 102, 5398-5405.
(12) Losi, A.; Wegener, A. A.; Engelhard, M.; Ga¨rtner, W.; Braslavsky,
S. E. Biophys. J. 2000, 78, 2581-2589.
(13) Feis, A.; Wegewijs, B.; Ga¨rtner, W.; Braslavsky, S. E. J. Phys.
Chem. B 1997, 101, 7620-7627.
larger for the trans than for the cis isomer, however, might
compensate the effect to a certain degree.
The above arguments indicate that the states in equilibrium
forming the intermediate T (the triplet perpendicular state 3p*,
devoid of conjugation of the C7-C8 bond, in equilibrium with
3
the lowest trans triplet state t*) have in average a structure
more similar to the cis isomer than to the trans one because
the contraction for the step trans f T is larger than that for the
cis f T.
The only other determination of a structural volume change
upon a stilbene isomerization known to us is that of the water
insoluble trans-stilbene in mixtures of nonpolar solvents. The
contribution of ∆VR to the LIOAS signal could not be separated
in these mixtures. An expansion of 5.6 mL/mol was reported
for the trans f cis photoreaction in micellar solutions.39 No
results were reported for the cis f trans photoisomerization in
this molecule. In view of the differences in photochemical
mechanisms (the trans-cis photoisomerization in stilbene occurs
through a singlet mechanism vs the triplet mechanism in the
nitrostilbenes14), and the differences in media it makes no sense
comparing our present data with those by Herman and Good-
man.39
(14) Go¨rner, H.; Kuhn, H. J. AdV. Photochem. 1995, 19, 1-117 and
references therein.
(15) Saltiel, J.; Sun, Y.-P. In Photochromism, Molecules and Systems;
Du¨rr, H.; Bouas-Laurent, H.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, 1990; pp 64-164.
(16) Losi, A.; Braslavsky, S. E.; Ga¨rtner, W.; Spudich, J. L. Biophys. J.
1999, 76, 2183-2191.
(17) Rudzki-Small, J. E.; Goodman, J. L.; Peters, K. S. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1985, 107, 7849-7854.
(18) Gensch, T.; Braslavsky, S. E. J. Phys. Chem. B 1997, 101, 101-
108.
(19) Nonell, S.; Aramend´ıa P. F.; Heihoff, K.; Negri, R. M.; Braslavsky,
S. E. J. Phys. Chem. 1990, 94, 5879-5883.
(20) Ma´rtire, D. O.; Jux, N.; Aramend´ıa, P. F.; Negri, R. M.; Lex, J.;
Braslavsky, S. E.; Schaffner, K.; Vogel, E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114,
9969-9978.
(21) Braslavsky, S. E.; Mu¨ller, M.; Ma´rtire, D. O.; Po¨rting, S.; Bertolotti,
S. G.; Chakravorti, S.; Koc¸-Weier, G.; Knipp, B.; Schaffner, K. J.
Photochem. Photobiol. B: Biol. 1997, 40, 191-198.
(22) Eaton, D. F. Pure Appl. Chem. 1988, 60, 1107-1114.
(23) Weast, R. C. CRC-Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 67thed.;
CRC Press: Boca Raton, Fl, 1986.
(24) Rudzki-Small, J. E.; Libertini, L. J.; Small, E. W. Biophys. Chem.
1992, 42, 29-48.
(25) Crippa, P. R.; Vecli, A.; Viappiani, C. J. Photochem. Photobiol.
B: Biol. 1994, 24, 3-15.
(26) Gensch, T.; Viappiani, C.; Braslavsky S. E. In Encyclopedia of
Spectroscopy and Spectrometry, Tranter, G. E.; Holmes, J. L., Eds;
Academic Press: San Diego, 1999; pp 1124-1132.
(27) Kropf, A.; Hubbard, R. Photochem. Photobiol. 1970, 12, 249-
260.
(28) Gensch, T.; Viappiani, C.; Braslavsky, S. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1999, 121, 10 573-10 582.
Regarding the enthalpy difference between both DS isomers,
geometry optimization performed by PM3 calculations (cf. Table
3, and Figure 6)40 indicate that the energy of trans-DS in the
gas-phase lies 37 kJ/mol below that of cis-DS. This is in
agreement with the experimental data, notwithstanding the large
error, ∆Hct ) -(28 ( 35) kJ/mol, vide supra. The comparison
between the experimental and the calculated value is justified
because the calculated change in dipole moment upon photo-
excitation is very small and no big changes in the electrostatic
interactions with the medium upon photoisomerization are
expected (as shown by the calculations presented above).
Acknowledgment. We are indebted to Dr. Helmut Go¨rner
for many fruitful discussions, to Dr. Paul Verhoeven for
preliminary molecular mechanics calculations, and to Professor
Kurt Schaffner for his continuous support of this project. We
are very grateful to Gul KoH-Weier for the separation of the
DS isomers by HPLC and acknowledge the able technical
assistance of Gudrun Klihm, Dagmar Lenk, and Sigrid Russell.
Miguel Angel Rodr´ıguez was a fellow of the Alexander von
Humboldt Foundation (1998 and 2000) and Alessandro Feis was
recipient of an EU fellowship (1995).
(29) Nau, W. M.; Scaiano, J. C. J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 11 360-
11 367, and references therein.
(30) Murov, S. L.; Carmichael, I.; Hug, G. L. Handbook of Photochem-
istry, 2nd ed.; Marcel Dekker: New York, 1993; p 207.
(31) Go¨rner, H. Ber. Bunsen-Ges. Phys. Chem. 1998, 102, 726.
(32) Go¨rner, H. Ber. Bunsen-Ges. Phys. Chem. 1984, 88, 1199.
(33) Kuhn, H. J.; Straatmann, R.; Schulte-Frohlinde, D. J. C. S. Chem.
Commun. 1976, 824-825.
(34) Krug, R. R.; Hunter, W. G.; Grieger, R. A. J. Phys. Chem. 1976,
80, 2335-2340.
(35) Borsarelli, C. D.; Braslavsky, S. E. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B
1998, 43, 222-228.
(36) Millero, F. Chem. ReV. 1971, 71, 147-176.
(37) Whalley, E. J. Chem. Phys. 1962, 38, 1400-1405.
(38) Borsarelli, C. D.; Braslavsky, S. E. J. Phys. Chem. A 1999, 103,
1719-1727.
(39) Herman, M. S.; Goodman, J. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111,
1849-1854.
References and Notes
(1) Van Eldik, R.; Asano, T.; Le Noble, W. J. Chem. ReV. 1989, 89,
549-688.
(2) Braslavsky, S. E.; Heibel, G. E. Chem. ReV. 1992, 92, 1381-1410.
(3) Churio, M. S.; Angermund, K. P.; Braslavsky, S. E. J. Phys. Chem.
1994, 98, 1776-1782.
(4) Drude, P.; Nernst, W. Z. Phys. Chem. 1884, 15, 79-85.
(5) Mun˜oz, R. C.; Holroyd, R. A.; Itoh, K.; Nagakawa, K.; Nishikawa,
M.; Fueki, K. J. Phys. Chem. 1987, 91, 4639-4643.
(6) Rodr´ıguez, M. A.; Braslavsky, S. E. J. Phys. Chem. A 1999, 103,
6295-6300.
(40) Stewart, J. J. P. J. Comput. Chem. 1989, 10, 209-220.